|
This is fake its manipulated
|
|
|
|
|
Um.
You expected genuine video of processes that occur on a molecular level? 
You do realize just how small molecules (including Deoxyribonucleic Acid) are?
To paraphrase the other DNA: "Mocelcules," it says, "are small. Really small. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly small they are. I mean, you may think human hair is thin, but that's just peanuts to molecules, listen..."
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
They fool you too 
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying you don;t believe in DNA? 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Not the DNA, I don't believe in Cloning.
|
|
|
|
|
1) Nobody is talking about Cloning - that's DNA Replication - a natural process that occurs inside every cell in your body on a very frequent basis, and without which no animal would survive more than a few weeks, since skin cells (for example) last only a month and have to be replaced...
2) Cloning happens regardless of belief: there are documented cases where it has been done in the larger mammals such as sheep, and family pets, and it is relatively easy to clone simpler life forms. Sorry, there is too much supporting evidence to say "I don't believe in cloning", just as there is for the existence of a huge universe regardless of what primitive people may have believed, or even continue to believe.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: such as sheep
... hence your interest 
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: documented cases where it has been done
The one who did it confess he built it from male it was not a Cloning it was false. Cloning never happened and it will never happen it is imposable. Don't be like a sheep that follow anything without real proof.
|
|
|
|
|
The levels of stupid. Ouch my brain.
.-.
|o,o|
,| _\=/_ .-""-.
||/_/_\_\ /[] _ _\
|_/|(_)|\\ _|_o_LII|_
\._. |\_/|"` |_| ==== |_|
|_|_| ||" || ||
|-|-| ||LI o ||
|_|_| ||'----'||
/_/ \_\ /__| |__\
|
|
|
|
|
Um.
I'm at a loss to know quite what to say here - from someone who has shown that he fervently believes what he is told with no proof whatsoever to start throwing words like "never happened" and "impossible" around, and to follow it with "Don't ... follow anything without real proof" is a little hypocritical, wouldn't you say?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5!!!!!
And more 5's.
|
|
|
|
|
Three things:
1. This is how cells are replicating DNA in the body, not how cloning is done by men.
2. The fact that you do not believe in something does not mean it never happened.
3. You should quit playing dumb. Really.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. You really are a sheep.
htexamples of documented animal cloninga>[^]
LOOK FOR YOURSELF. You are apparently just believing what a couple of idiots, who themselves haven't read anything on it, are telling you. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH and you'll find it is true and possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you seriously that ignorant?
I'm sure you'll like this: My Friend Again[^]
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why is cloning suddenly involved anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate the word cloning from your dictionary since it do not exists.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure? You can do it in your backyard. Cut off a piece of a plant (of a species that makes it work well, like tomatoes), keep it in a cup of water for a time until it develops tiny roots, then stick it in the ground.
And there you go, cloned a plant. Easy.
modified 22-Feb-14 9:05am.
|
|
|
|
|
Why? The word exists to describe a human concept. Eliminating the word does not eliminate the concept, even if you believe that concept does not exist in the physical world.
This is a programming web site, devoted almost entirely to software. Software has little to no physical existence. Should be therefore eliminate the thousands of terms used to describe it from our vocabulary?
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Mohamad M. Mohamad wrote: Eliminate the word cloning from your dictionary since it do not exists.
yes it does exist even if you choose not to recognize it.
As explained by Harold Aptroot but not limited to that explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow.
Why doesn't it exist?? Because some Imam told you it didn't??
Now who's being the sheep??
The beautiful part of the science is the "independent peer review process". It's IMPOSSIBLE to fake something and get it past peer review because someone is going to figure it out and call you out on it or at least call you out on problems with the original experimentation process.
Cloning exists because it's been done by various independent teams of people who have examined the claims, researched the basis for those claims, REPEATEDLY experimented and verified the claims, and duplicated the results themselves, thereby verifying what the initial team claims to have done!
There is NO TOP-LEVEL SCIENTIFIC AUTHORITY THAT RULES ALL SCIENTISTS NAD GOVERNS WHAT THEY CAN AND CANNOT SAY. This is an important point. The scientific community has built-in checks and balances to make sure what is presented and said is true to the base of what we have already PROVEN to be true. Notice I did not say "what we already KNOW to be true".
Science is a self-correcting process. If someone comes along and proves that something we have already taken as fact is wrong, the science takes the new information into account and changes accordingly. But, don't forget, it has to pass the peer review process!
Religion has no such process and religion has a structured ruling authority. The BEST they have is a group of people discussing a topic and coming to an agreed upon consensus which is then turned into dogma for dissemination down the chain of command to the followers. They have no proof at all backing up what they say and no way for an independent team to verify and constructively criticize what is being handed down.
Want proof of this?? How many different "brands" of Islam are there? There are over 30,000 versions of organized Christianity just in the United States! Each "religion" has it's own version of events and interpretations. None can agree because there is no evidence definitively supporting the "one true" version and/or interpretation of events to the exclusion of all others, thereby leading to the severe fracturing of any one religion system. Everyone claims they're correct and everyone else is wrong.
modified 22-Feb-14 10:01am.
|
|
|
|
|
Well said. 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to ask the question no one else has bothered to ask.
Why do you think cloning is impossible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ummm...did you bother to read the title? It's an "animation". So yes, it's a representation of what really happens.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
