|
By trying to neutralize gender you are the one devaluing both males and females. Embrace the differences. Be grateful for them.
Man up. Respect women because they are women. Holding the door for a woman devalues her gender? That is so stupid.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: What does that even mean?
Proof of my point.
Quote: Why should they get more or less respect because of their gender?
Further proof.
Quote: If done simply because she is a woman yes.
And yet more proof.
Quote: Call it what you want
OK. I call it being polite. Or being a man. Take your pick. Both work.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing new? OK.
When you got something new that's funny let me know. All these jokes are worn out by you.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Still refusing to answer.
OK. If you say so Collin. Sure.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, not at all.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I still have the last word because an icon is not a word.
Burn! 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
K, fine. I'll let you have the last word. Go ahead. You're welcome.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
OK. If you say so Collin. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone bother to goto the site and view the HTML source? I am going to go out on a limb and state that the design philosophy was rapid change. Those are some bloated pages. Maybe code project could have a contest to see who can rewrite the healthcare.gov home page (just the index) in the smallest download footprint that would operate on the latest versions of all the major browsers.
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: Anyone bother to goto the site and view the HTML source?
yup[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, JavaScript is evil! 
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
and there are 500 million lines of source code!
there is just so much nonsense out there about this right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a great overview of what happened on a technical level, it looks like the front-end was done by one company (and is Ruby based), and the back-end was done by a different company and is Java based.
Great read!
|
|
|
|
|
The website looks very MVC - ish to me. Microsoft or not. With some backbone.js thrown in there.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It's no different than a Microsoft.com site. Or the Apple.com site. Or any of thousands of other websites.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
