|
has CP ever wondered on creating a new forum? kinda like forum.codeproject.com
|
|
|
|
|
Erm... What? And even more important: why?
|
|
|
|
|
no real reason. like a programming discussion forum
|
|
|
|
|
Do you not think there are enough of them already....Forum List[^]
|
|
|
|
|
no surly we do have enough
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, ok, 100% clear now... 
|
|
|
|
|
ExcelledProducts CEO wrote: has CP ever wondered on creating a new forum?
how about learntospell.codeproject.com ? 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
That's a grate idea.
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
i got a D- in english and spelling and grammar from as far back as i can remember. Then came high school and we didn't do any spelling and I got an A-
|
|
|
|
|
Public some thoughtful CodeProject artickles, or Trips-Trickles ... and ... we will lighten this load of shame you bare.
yours, Bill
"What Turing gave us for the first time (and without Turing you just couldn't do any of this) is he gave us a way of thinking about and taking seriously and thinking in a disciplined way about phenomena that have, as I like to say, trillions of moving parts.
Until the late 20th century, nobody knew how to take seriously a machine with a trillion moving parts. It's just mind-boggling." Daniel C. Dennett
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you think there are already enough to cover just about every subject? Plus Q&A and rootadmin. What exactly do you think is missing?
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
The geek (my eldest, 9) is giving her mum a lesson in entering unicode values on a chromebook for putting symbols on her school homework presentation.
She has also now bookmarked a website that has the look up tables for the symbols to unicode hex values.
Too amusing...
|
|
|
|
|
Go Little Geek, go! 
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
I read that as Unicorn!
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
0x1F4A9 is the only one you need. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I bet people here remember VS2012's 'Waiting for a background operation to complete' dialog. Well, VS2013 has that dialog, but with the message 'Waiting for a required operation to complete' instead.
Looks like someone on the VS team has some sense left!
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant.
- Mitchell Kapor
|
|
|
|
|
But is it waiting for its complement of lemon-soaked towelettes?
|
|
|
|
|
Of course! It needs it's comfort, refreshment and hygiene like the rest of us.
Zarniwoop is waiting...
|
|
|
|
|
not until they find a better way to make piracy of there products harder. I mean really who though of the Idea that if you have a msdn license a license key then you get an install disk (or download) of the program without a license key enter page.??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
|
|
|
|
|
Well that makes sense.
If it really is a background operation, there should be no need to wait.
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
Progress, I see they've addressed the problem and taken appropriate action! At least for MS.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not just MS.
I reported a problem with a feature option on an IBM mainframe O/S (VM) and the fix they put in was an updated manual page that said that option was no longer supported for that feature!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I think corps like IBM, Microsoft, etc.. stop listening at a certain point because it takes so much red tape to get anything done no one bothers?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like VS2012 was outsourced but then quality assurance teams in the first world caught up (in a year)!
|
|
|
|
|
i can't add more code blocks to my article for some reason.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
