|
Can you see the point in whole numbers?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure there's a well rounded explanation for that
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
No, but I can see the hole in 0.
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
What fraction of the response will be rational?
Most are integerst simple replies - prime-arily, they will not transcendental others about it.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 0.5
Ad astra - both ways!
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's a complex problem, but the answers are likely to be imaginary. Before you branch cut, I suggest that you get a real grip on the origin of the problem.
Ad astra - both ways!
|
|
|
|
|
This whole discussion is irrational and will never end.
I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended.
I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended.
Freedom doesn't mean the absence of things you don't like.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Now you're just being asymptotic.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought I was being natural and you go all negative.
But I will log your comment.
Now I want to go eat some pi.
|
|
|
|
|
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
...
PS: I even found a bug in posting this, there is a newline between i and ii however it doesn't work...
modified 10-May-18 21:26pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone knows Roman keyboards didn't have lowercase.
|
|
|
|
|
They do nowadays. They didn't at first, initially they hadn't any point or punctuation.
Wikipedia: Minuscule (lower-case) letters were developed in the Middle Ages, well after the demise of the Western Roman Empire, and since that time lower-case versions of Roman numbers have also been commonly used: i, ii, iii, iv, and so on.
In the MS Word "Numbering Library" both casings are available.
int i=1; has three points; you could try and avoid some of them, however we all learned today you don't prefer var over int ...
|
|
|
|
|
Now go respond to the post about the Sieve of Eratosthenese.
|
|
|
|
|
The answer, my friend, is floating in the int...
|
|
|
|
|
Best played on a custom bankrupt Gibson guitar:
Codeproject BOB sang:
Yes, and how many seas must our mascot Bob sail?
Before he sleeps in the sand?
Yes, and how many times must the homework questions fly?
Before they're forever banned?
The answer, my friend, is blowing in the int.
The answer is blowing in the int.
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: Best played on a custom bankrupt Gibson guitar
Indeed! 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just not that integer
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
Comma to think of it, it's called a thousand separator 
|
|
|
|
|
public async Task<Result> LoadData()
{
...
var result = new Result();
...
return result;
}
The signature says I'm returning a Task of type Result, but the code says I'm returning the type itself.
I know what's going on. It just feels...clunky.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's just you.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
Yes just him... That after fighting longer time on this subject 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Ick.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
It's clunky, I tried to use async but gave up, just too much trouble too implement.
And await ... surprise, does not wait !
I prefer working with Tasks and Task.Factory.
|
|
|
|
|
RickZeeland wrote: I prefer working with Tasks and Task.Factory.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
