|
Just when a five-meter python had his mouth around kitty, his 63 year-old love slave, Mrs, Saving, and neighbors, and local snake--busters, to the rescue. Note the story is written in a form of mutilated English expats sometimes refer to as "Tainglish:" [^]
Rascal python is getting deported to a far forest where perhaps he'll enjoy backpackers.
«... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12
|
|
|
|
|
Google translate isn't being a whole lot of help here:Quote: Mrs. Saving, age 63, the owner of the house heard his cat cats in the back of the house to walk to see that the big boar is eating his own cat. They use a snake bite until the serpent to the wall of the house's mortar by the cats themselves are injured bite the abdomen. Before the rescue team to help.
I think I see what is happening, but ... 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Always said Python was dangerous... 
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: Rascal python is getting deported to a far forest where perhaps he'll enjoy backpackers.
That's the "official" version for westerners. Meanwhile:
... the villagers are enjoying a meal from a "very long chicken."
... the cat is back enjoying "playing" with other small indigenous wildlife.
|
|
|
|
|
lopati: roaming wrote: villagers are enjoying a meal from a "very long chicken."
Good. Just think of how long Kentucky Fried T-Rex has been out of business.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
I liked the pictures from another article of an undamaged pickup truck and a totaled front end of a sedan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yo! Da sixth Beatle has been identified!
Socialism is the Axe Body Spray of political ideologies: It never does what it claims to do, but people too young to know better keep buying it anyway. (Glenn Reynolds)
|
|
|
|
|
All you need is Yoda!
and coffee!
Everyone has a photographic memory; some just don't have film. Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
black coffee
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That would've been something...
Twenty years ago today, it was
Taught the band to play, Master Yoda did
In and out of style, they've been going
Raise a smile, they were guaranteed to
Now, introduce to you I may
Master Yoda's Lonely Hearts Club Baaaaand!
Doesn't quite have the same hit potential... 
|
|
|
|
|
The drummer we are looking for this is not ... along move, along move ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Reinstalling win 10 in a Laptop from the scratch due to problems with the last update (it was long time offline without net).
Grafic card driver installation. Original file is a big exe, that unpacks and executes on its own.
But as I already had the unpacked folder, I wanted to install it directly:
- If you call the setup yourself, you get the message "it can not be called from this location"
- If you call the exe and give an existent folder, you get the message "it could not create the folder" and it deletes the previously generated folder 
- If you try to unpack the things on your own, you can't "because admin privileges are needed" (needles to say that I am admin) [EDIT: just for nitpicky users... I was using the "exe as admin" too)
Only way to install the driver... delete the folder again, let the installer create it, unpack everything and call the setup.exe on its own. Then... it works.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 9-Sep-18 9:43am.
|
|
|
|
|
Chances are it called the setup with parameters which tell it what to do and where - it you don't supply them, it can't do its job.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose you are right. But i find it a bit intrincate. Nevermind... I just wanted to rant a bit about it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: you can't "because admin privileges are needed" (needles to say that I am admin)
Why do people still make that mistake to this day?
Just because you're part of the admin group doesn't mean you're currently running a process with admin privileges.
Right-click on the EXE, select Run as Admin.
This is a good thing.
|
|
|
|
|
And how do you think I am doing it?
If it worked, I would not rant on it.
EDIT:
Ok, I have to recognize that I didn't do it the first time, but I did afterwards (before posting). And yes, I should have told it explicitelly, since it isn't something obvious.
By the way...
12 different drivers doing exactly the same, don't complain.
this driver being executed by the unpacker has no problem at all with the right levels.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 9-Sep-18 9:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: you can't "because admin privileges are needed" (needles to say that I am admin)
Why does windows have this issue to this day?
Any proper operating system would know you have the privileges already and just get it done.
Just download and install a real OS.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Because Windows will not automatically promote an application above its starting privilege level - and for good reasons. If it did, there would be no point at all in having the layer of security, because any app that wanted it could just have itself promoted.
When / if your "real OS" gets as widespread as Windows, you'll probably learn why it's a Good Idea - at the moment there isn't the mass market, so there are far fewer attacks. If one changes, so will the other ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
:cough: PrimeOS :cough:
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: Why does windows have this issue to this day?
Any proper operating system would know you have the privileges already and just get it done.
"Why doesn't Linux run every command I enter with 'su', since it knows I'm part of the sudoers list, I have the privileges already."
Always running with admin just because you're part of that group as you're suggesting is the equivalent of logging into Linux as root. And that's how pre-Vista versions of Windows used to be. And Microsoft realized they couldn't keep doing things that way.
At least as an admin, you don't have to type in your password every time to grant yourself the admin privilege.
|
|
|
|
|
Remember when computers used to be easy to use?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
I remember my spectrum 128 and my first pentium 75 MHz. It was not easy to use them, but it often was less frustrant than nowadays.
I do recognise that one can do tons of stuff more than before, but IMO things are somehow losing "quality".
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
David Crow wrote: Remember when computers used to be easy to use?
Yeah, but they would've been trivial to pwn (yeah, I used that word). OTOH, they weren't connected to the internet back then. Well, not the majority of them. It's been a battle between convenience and security ever since.
Also...it depends how far back you're thinking when you say "easy to use". Some would argue, were they ever? 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
