|
Luca Leonardo Scorcia wrote: I found that the time spent in migrating and tweaking and fixing the open source equivalents was way more expensive than the DevExpress' retail price.
Amen!
|
|
|
|
|
if you have build it with the license it should'nt show any message.just contact the support to assit
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
I've used devexpress reports in the past, and found the to be
1. superior to anything else I've seen so far
2. thus worth the price (which includes support, and their support guys are really doing a good job)
I only have a signature in order to let @DalekDave follow my posts.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: Any reason not to use it?
What, aside from the text that says "This is a very early alpha version not intented to be used in production environments", and the fact that it hasn't been migrated off the now-defunct CodePlex site? 
There's a forked version on GitHub[^], which was last updated in 2016. The "alpha / don't use" warning is still there.
It doesn't look like there's anyone actively working on it.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Another flaw hits Tapplock smart locks, thanks to leaky server | ZDNet[^]
leaky company's API server....MAC address and converts it using the MD5 algorithm....
Who architects these solutions , who test them ...where are the standards ?
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Standards? We don't need no stinkin' standards.
|
|
|
|
|
As long as we have badges!
I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended.
I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended.
Freedom doesn't mean the absence of things you don't like.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Did you say badgers? ![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. These folks shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a security-oriented business. I can't believe (according to the article) unlocking only requires an obfuscation (by MD5) of the MAC address. That's a criminally stupid design.
|
|
|
|
|
They probably got the code from QA or SO ... 
Obligatory CommitStrip[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
And, double wow. How are these folks in business? Bad technological security and bad physical security as well...this product simply has it all.
A lock you can disassemble with a screwdriver. I guess at least its not a tool-less disassembly? 
|
|
|
|
|
"We will continue to monitor the latest security trends and provide updates from time to time"
What do they mean "continue"?
If they ever did that they wouldn't be having these problems in the first place 
|
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of security trends to monitor, and they are starting from the beginning.
It shouldn't take them long, they have reached the point where the door key has been invented. Coming soon: the door lock.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And shortly after that MD5, that should be an interesting lesson for them
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed. I hear it is not just a brilliant encryption algorithm, but an excellent compression system as well!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And who doesn't love to win? Arun Kumar is today's spot prize winner in the Summer Fun with Arduino Challenge - hope you have some cool IoT projects in mind for your brand new Arduino kit.
And if writing is your thing, just a friendly reminder, we have many prizes to give away for our 2 article writing challenges as well. So if you've developed a cool new IoT project or just want to show off your expertise, we'd love to see those articles. Happy Friday!
|
|
|
|
|
If it's raining Raspberry Pis, I'd better start wearing a helmet.
Congrats on the win, Arun!
|
|
|
|
|
Preamble
I checked whether it meets the lounge criterions. I think it does and see no reason why to post this in soap box.
Now the question
Should I eat meat in case I'm not able to kill the [Edit] basic [/Edit] supplier [Edit]of the meat[/Edit]by myself?
Btw: I eat meat.
[Edit1]FYI:
Public slaughter pits Swiss tradition against modern thinking - SWI swissinfo.ch[^]
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
By that logic, should I now begin eating airplanes?
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Excuse me please, but in your answer I see absolutely no logic; at most an Alibi...
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That's ok. I have not shot down anything lately.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you want to kill the butcher?
|
|
|
|
|
Ups, now I recognize it, I squinted (take care Google translated...)
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It's ok if you buy it from "Nice to meat" over here in Holland 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
