|
I've only been with FXCM, and the whole suffix thing is new to me then. Go figure. Would be interested to continue this conversation, but it seems your last message got flagged as spam. CP no likey.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
TonyManso wrote: Am I the only one who frequents CP that writes algos for financial markets?
No, once in a while the subject comes up; last post I remember about the subject was about reading headlines and weighing the sentiment.
Trading currencies has never been my thing; one can see the value of (all fiat) currencies go down over time. Who is going down fastest is mostly a bet on which central bank stimulates next.
Would be nice to see more articles on the subject. Would also be nice to see some data on following the algo's advice 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Trading currencies has never been my thing; one can see the value of (all fiat) currencies go down over time.
I totally agree, but in the climb down to zippo for the fiats, there are swings. Those swings you can still make a profit off of, while on the road to fiat doomsday.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
About three years ago, I gave it a try with a friend. It didn't go anywhere. All the algorithms failed massively on the historical data, so we gave up.
|
|
|
|
|
I spent twelve years involved in this field, but I'm not allowed to tell you a damned thing about it.
What I can say is that not a single person who is involved in trading understands cr@p about how it all works.
Details cannot follow.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, the people I've worked for might not have even a single, functional logic gate in their brains, but they do have good lawyers.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Strange feeling. I was googling trying to find some answers about technical problem, and third result was my own article on CP. 
I guess there is no answer, if I found what I already know (nope, I did not forgot) and maybe this is more than available in technical documentation.
No more Mister Nice Guy... >: |
|
|
|
|
|
I have often had to google my own article because I forgot how to do something but vaguely remembered I had written about it 10 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
It is embarrassing to google something you can't remember how to do and find your self as the top hit due to a tip you forgot you wrote. 
Had it a few times... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
n.podbielski wrote: and third result was my own article on CP.
Been there, done that.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, for God's sake!
The answer is 42!
Get with the program!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
After seeing "La La Land" win the best picture I thought, "Wow! A musical wins? That's unusual."
Then reality crashed back and "Moonlight" actually won.
My question is, having watched one of the most uninteresting, pointless and boring movies of the last year, how are these decisions actually made? How on Earth can Moonlight win? The story was uninspired, uninteresting, had poor pacing and the acting wasn't even that great. There was no payoff at the end and no real message other than growing up can be a bit hard sometimes.
Don't get me wrong. Maybe it was OK for some people, there wasn't anything particularly bad (except the language) in it. My point isn't against this movie, it's just that there were many, many much better movies to choose from (such as Manchester by the Sea - which I didn't like much but was more interesting than Moonlight, or Arrival, which was deemed too intellectual for many people (only one small explosion and no death rays) but I though was great, lots of suspense and a strong secondary story, even La La Land was more interesting and really, really more entertaining even though I wouldn't watch it again any time soon).
My real question is, based on studying results for the last few years and incidents such as Harry Potter being snubbed so much (not just a little, but a lot), Meryl Streep not winning anything, and so on, who do you have to pay off, sleep with or blackmail to get the results you want in the Oscars?
Doesn't the whole system reek of corruption and politics? I'm not talking about any politicians or anything to do with any country's election system here; otherwise I would have posted this in the Soapbox.
I would be interested in other opinions - no US politics please.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Awards are a good indicator of what _not_ to see.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Awards are a good indicator of what _not_ to see.
Lot of truth in that.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed. I wasn't planning on watching Moonlight or La La Land.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely skip Moonlight, La La Land is passable if you like Jazz otherwise forget it. Arrival is good as is Hacksaw Ridge which probably didn't have a chance of winning because the lead actor is half British!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect that in most cases a certain film wins because it's the director's/lead actors' "turn" to win. Last year no film with minorities was nominated, so this year they selected a film with an all-black cast.
It's a stupid way to choose the "best", but as long as the marks shell out money to see the films, why should they change the system?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Forogar wrote: Arrival, which was deemed too intellectual for many people
Really? I never thought I'd see a hollywood movie described as such. I'd imagine that there are goodly sums of money transferred around up until the time that the cards are printed, to whom, I'm not certain. There's just too much money too be made with a nomination and/or win to keep it honest.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Because the Oscars are Hollywood's most prestigious awards, they tend to award movies that make it look like they're saying, "Hey, we care about this particular issue our culture or humanity as a whole is dealing with (or perceived to be dealing with) right now."
You've also got to factor in the size of the Academy (6000ish I think) and human nature. There are all kinds of campaigns being made by studios to try and keep their film at the forefront of people's minds. And lunches, don't forget about those lunches. Supposedly the Academy changes the rules every year of how you're allowed to court voters, but even if you're a professional trying to be above board about how you vote, maybe that lunch or that campaign swayed you.
Also a lot of the Academy are pretty old. Films like Mad Max are too violent and too weird to pierce their sensibilities.
Every year is kind of the same experience. A lot of people are either unhappy with what won best picture, or don't understand why it won best picture. Considering the system and culture surrounding these awards, it's always going to be a problem. I personally just look at the trends of what's expected to win and don't get my hopes up too high for anything, because it's a problematic system.
Also, there are indeed merits for Moonlight, but any time you tell a story with a non-traditional narrative structure, you're going to turn off a looooooooot of people.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
A topic dear to your heart, it would seem?
|
|
|
|
|
 One day I plan to really dig deep and research the Oscars all the way. There's a lot in that big ol' mess.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Simples, just like in the rest of the world and any unmentioned politics.
Follow the money.
|
|
|
|
|
They are a bit like CodeProject points, but not as useful.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
