|
Oh, I dunno. The MD of one company offered to pay mine for a week on the stand at a trade show at the NEC.
Once. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
She's a Doctor, what could go wrong!? 
|
|
|
|
|
Something just isn't right with that email.
Reminds me of :
Homeless
Will work for
food
God bless everyone
Ehm...
Remain Calm & Continue To Google
|
|
|
|
|
I have installed VS Community 2015 and the pre-release of VS Community 2017. When I try to create a project in either version, the highest .NET Framework shown is 4.6.2.
I have purchased a book from Samms entitled MS Visual Studio 2015 Unleashed. The title of Chapter 17 is "Building Modern Websites with ASP.NET 5". There is a screen shot in the chapter showing the project templates. It shows both ASP.NET 4.6 Templates and ASP.NET 5 Preview Templates from which to create the project.
Have I missed something here?
|
|
|
|
|
xiecsuk wrote: Have I missed something here?
Yes, the text in red at the top of the page.
|
|
|
|
|
Asp.Net 5, resides in the red text at the top of this page? Wow, now that is cool technology!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do not consider this to be a programming question as I know ASP.NET 5 does not exist. It is a rhetorical question, which is suitable for this forum!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you BPfH. I had missed that missive from Scott. It clears a lot of things up in the old brain. I shall go forward with renewed vigour.
|
|
|
|
|
I keep telling people that those bluddy time travellers keep messing things up, but no-one listens!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore them, I mean the comments regarding "programming question". It is only a illustrious circle allowed here to post such a thing here.... 
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
ASP.NET 5 was renamed to ASP.NET Core. It's NOT the direct upgrade to ASP.NET 4.6.x.
|
|
|
|
|
Please see reply to Eddy Vluggen. Thank you for the information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The windows 10 taskbar is so close to being awesome on multi-monitors...yet so far away. It drives me nuts that they included these options for "Show taskbar buttons on":
1) All taskbars
2) Main taskbar and taskbar where window is open
3) Taskbar where window is open
But neglected to include a separate option to toggle whether you want pinned items to appear on one taskbar or both...WHY??? For some reason they seemingly arbitrarily decided that pinned items appear on both taskbars if you pick #1, but #2 and #3 stop showing pinned items on secondary monitors.
I want the option to open pinned items from either monitor, but I want opened windows to only show they are open on the monitor they are on, not on both. This seems like the most obvious and logical way to organize the taskbars, I don't understand why that isn't an option...
The other thing that was driving me a little nuts was that if I had a Chrome window open on one monitor but clicked the taskbar icon on a different monitor, it always pops open on whichever other monitor a chrome window is already open on instead of the one that has my mouse on it. I'm glad to report I just solved that problem with a little background application that moves any new windows to the monitor your mouse is on if they open on another monitor, but COMMON I want pinned items on both screens and I don't want to clutter my main taskbar with windows open on other monitors. Is that so much to ask for?
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Marynowski wrote: Is that so much to ask for?
Yes. Remember, Win10 is aimed at tablets and phones, with desktops lucky to get a look-in. One screen, no hassle!
Sell one of your monitors: problem solved!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I think you're thinking windows 8. Windows 10 had shifted the focus back to desktop way more and added multi-monitor taskbars for the first time ever, which is nice, except that it *really* needs that minor tweak to make it power user friendly.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 10 is "Windows 8 SP2" - it's better for desktops, but it's still clear they are an afterthought. Compare Win10 with Win7, and you'll see the "desktop focus" is still poor, with useless Metro / UWP apps and such littering the thing, and a lack of "cohesive design" which Win7 showed in spades.
And before you ask, yes, I'm running Win10 on my desktop; yes, my WookieTab is running Win10 far, far more than Android.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, my mistake, multi monitor taskbars were added in Windows 8 but were much more limited. They expanded features in 10 to make it usable, now maybe they will get it right in the next release haha.
And while I kind of agree regarding Windows 8 SP2, I think Windows 10 is now a far better operating system even for desktops than Windows 7 was. I know not everyone agrees with that but other than the taskbar issue, I really love Windows 10, especially after all the updates now. I disagree that desktop is an afterthought at this point just because it has pretty metro stuff everywhere. I find it works great.
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree, to an extent: look at all the UWP apps. Settings - where you can't find anything you want, but it takes a huge amount of space to do it - and you end up going back to Control Panel for anything serious. Or the Mail app - right click a picture in Explorer, select "Send to"..."Mail Recipient" and watch what happens. You need to install the non-UWP Live Mail (from the now discontinued Windows Essentials pack) to do what happened correctly in Win7.
And don't get me started on the Fisher-Price start menu, or the advertising, or Cortana's obsession with Bong, or ... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Click a hyperlink/button inside UWP Mail, I dare you. It takes 10+ seconds till the browser launches.
There is so much wrong with UWP.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Windows 10 is "Windows 8 SP2"
That's a bit cruel, they did rewrite some core. "9-beta" is probably more apt.
(ms are not the first to go commercial with a beta.)
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Marynowski wrote: except that it *really* needs that minor tweak to make it power user friendly
Like that'll ever get fixed.
The wisest thing is probably to use a third-party taskbar app.
The guys making smaller apps have their hearts in the game; ms is running (and stumbling) in completely different directions.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
They've been improving multi-monitor support every release since original Win8 so I have my hopes up. That said, I used to use Ultramon waaaay back in the day when I was still sporting multiple CRTs so maybe I'll check out how it's doing these days.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
