|
To C or not to C
That is the question
... such stuff as dreams are made on
And our little lives are rounded
With a curly brace
|
|
|
|
|
|
To C sharper or not, is another question.
|
|
|
|
|
Should have gone to Specsavers
That is the answer. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
R not Julia the Ruby of the realm?
Go hither and think not upon Ada,
Whose Basic baseness is not worthy a Boo,
C to it sharply and bring Clojure Forth,
Dart away now to her awaiting arms,
As her love for you awaits in the Eiffel tower of her heart,
Like an Elixir to her suffering,
Be not a Hack, a Python in the weeds, but be instead Groovy,
Woo her with Java,
Be Lithe, speak Lucid and without a Lisp,
Utter not a bovine Moo from thy lips,
Instead may an Opal be upon thy tongue,
Your Prolog Swift,
Your Smalltalk small,
Scheme little, for honesty is the Unicorn
upon which no Rust will form.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Not impressed, you didn't fit JavaScript in there! 
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methinks Hamlet would've preferred:
"To B[^] or not to B[^]...
That is the question."
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
C programmers would've preferred:
int the_question = (2*b) | !(2*b);
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm about to kick off a new project in C#. There is no legacy to worry about and so I'm thinking what environment to use.
I shall shortly install Visual Studio, it is up to you, dear Cpians, to distruct in which version* to go for....
* I would love to go back to the simplicity of VS6 but those days are gone 
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
VB3 - those were good times... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I can, hand on heart, say I really liked VB6. I wouldn't go near it today, but at the time I liked it. VB3 has a frogging script and UI engine but it got us some good sales.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
I liked VB6 too. VB3 was my first IDE; and I like it for that, but seriously, the IDE itself wasn't very good. Free floating windows à la Delphi where you can see the desktop behind it and get distracted by that wasn't really my thing...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I even, briefly, thought about having a play VB.net. But then I sobered up.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
What kind of project is it? Web? WPF? Something else?
I'm happy with VS2013, not sure if the performance issues some have experienced with VS2015 have been sorted out.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm unsure if I should stay in VS2013 or go forward to VS2015. The project will initially be a lot of back-end components but there's an 83.6% chance of it going web faced.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say it depends on whether you will use any of the new features / improvements that VS2015 offers.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you have a specific reason not to, all apps should be web based, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope LOB apps behind the firewall should be WPF using clickonce. I can build it 3 times faster in WPF than most devs can build a web app and it is still a far better UI than anything delivered via a browser.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
So, you have reason not to. 
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: I shall shortly install Visual Studio,
It's not installed already? What have you been using all this time, stone tablets? 
Our shop moved from VS2012 to VS2015 with all the latest updates. As long as you don't have FIPS enabled on your machine, you should be fine. We have been using it for about 4 months now, exclusively, and all is good so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Since my last re-install, I have been doing Java, Ruby and JavaScript mostly. I am also doing a lot of [paid] Matlab work as well now.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
By brother uses Matlab at his research/testing facility. Cool stuff there.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have FIPS enabled even older versions might be problematic. 90% of my app would compile under 2010 and 2015; the module that did Excel interop OTOH was blacklisted by the compiler when all the FIPS settings were turned on. Normally I just remembered to sneakernet the bin/obj folders across the airgap with the code; as long as I didn't need to modify that project I was fine. On rare occasions when I did need to tinker with that part on the production system (sneaker-netting the real data across the airgap was forbidden; so at times i needed to use a copy of the production data on the destination network to debug things); my thankfully very helpful admin would turn it off on my PC for as long as the dev session lasted.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
or....you could just turn the damn thing off in dev, like we do. It's the compiler that uses MD5 cryptography. The final binaries in Production are fine. --> food for thought.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
