|
|
Yes, I vote JavaScript too.
|
|
|
|
|
Man who votes against JavaScripts is probably designer not coder.
Still, the question remains: why, o why?
|
|
|
|
|
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to propose making that a global ban!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Outlaw everything except machine code. Languages are for wimps.
|
|
|
|
|
He wants to outlaw JavaScript. Crazy as it may seem, he has my vote!
|
|
|
|
|
So...the three votes on the petition are you, Mycroft, and jgkenhe?
You have a long way to go...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Still a good three weeks to go, have a little faith!
|
|
|
|
|
Can you even outlaw javascript on a web-based petition? Doesn't that break causality in some way?
|
|
|
|
|
My specific suggested list of languages to restrict from use, and phase out includes:
Javascript, Ruby, and Java.
Amen! Got my sig!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
This ranks way up there with the Flat Earth Society:
[^]
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely agree with petition creator in terms of real outlaw of IT poop! But MY LIST is different:
1. JavaScript
2. Python
3. PHP
These are most ugly, error prone and dangerous languages in IT!
|
|
|
|
|
I am curious, what are your alternative!
|
|
|
|
|
Why, VBScript, of course!
Sincerely,
-Mark
mamiller@rhsnet.org
|
|
|
|
|
OK, got you! I think C# could be good replacement for all of 'em.
Web scripting (ASP and "browser language") DOES NOT mean language cannot be "statically typed". Quite opposite: as soon as your code reaches 10KLOC, you strictly need some control above that! I spit on display seeing ugly JS code, which idiot-web-developer made working in FireFox only! And tons of errors "property/element not found" - just because it was dynamic JavaScrap.
As a bonus we have already written library (Framework) to have really rich applications!
modified 21-Mar-16 21:09pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I like your list and Ruby, and Java.
|
|
|
|
|
hehe Why?
Ruby is like OOP Perl. It's dynamic and also has its own niche. May be not for serious Web-development, but for scripting - why not?
Java - hell knows... I have no sympathy for this simplistic language, but at least it's OOP and allows mediocres write acceptable programs. It's not evil, definitely
|
|
|
|
|
If I start a petition to ban elepants and sunshines in the lounge, will CPers migrate to stack overflow?
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
If only he would add PHP he'd have my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How are you going to outlaw protected speech? Code is expression/speech, pretty much already established. If you don't like a language, then don't use it. If your job requires it, find a better job for yourself, let those of us who would like it, have that job.
As an aside, who came up with this **STUPID** idea, anyway? The FBI?
|
|
|
|
|
Today a man knocked on my door and asked for a small donation towards the local swimming pool.
I gave him a glass of water.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta tomorrow (noun): a mystical land where 99% of all human productivity, motivation and achievement is stored.
|
|
|
|
|
Coulda put some salt on the rim too.
|
|
|
|
|
I hope he returns the glass.
|
|
|
|