|
9082365 wrote: Frisbee was born in 1964
There's actually a lot more history to the frisbee which puts it way past 10 years.
History of the Frisbee[^]
The book is talking about the time from the initial idea of the original thinker to it taking off in the general population. Think a bit more broadly. Not the time a few people first heard of it. When a technology is initially created it is often known about for many years before all the things come together to move it in a big way.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahem. I didn't say Frisbee. I said Professional Frisbee. The good idea was to turn the flying disc from an unstable plaything into an an aerodynamically sound, stable and more easily controlled piece of sports equipment.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Since when?
Since the idea of cherry-picking data came about, of course!
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
The very, very, best, dazzlingly brilliant ideas come when I've got nothing to write them down with.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So true. So many fantastic ideas lost to time all due to the lack of pen and paper. 
|
|
|
|
|
Define "good idea".
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
If you insist.
#define idea(good)
Happy now?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That's a good point.
The author admits that this is more about studying the environment that creates good ideas and that good ideas are based upon ideas that we can look at in retrospect which produced something that a "large" number of people accepted as good ideas. But, of course, the majority always know a good idea when they smell one. Great ideas are often rejected and terrible ideas are often accepted. 
|
|
|
|
|
It even can be more interesting, where the good ideas go to...
I was once part of a team developing a mechanical part for a shower, that would stop water flow when water is too hot...It was a big deal, as it is very cheap to assembly, need no external source, easy to use and hold for years...
We even got 2 minutes on the news!
So...the big company promised promises an bought the idea...The big company still selling the same, expensive, electronic device it used to...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting story, thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The answer is Bird of prey.
Raptured - lose political institution - EU, backward UE (although not sure this was neccessary), -> Raptrd, also lose drive (D, in an automatic car) -> Raptr
Now gain nothing (O) -> Raptor
Aviator = bird (to distinguish from Velociraptor or similar)
And finally, a raptor is more commonly known as a bird of prey.
Looks like I'm back up for Monday  ?
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, that doesn't really follow the (admittedly unwritten) rules of crossword clues.
An anagram requires some kind of indicator that it is an anagram, known as an anagrind (short for anagram indicator). So a phrase like "scrambled eggs" could indicate some jumble of the letters E-G-G-S or "intense confusion" could indicate an anagram of "intense" for example.
Without the anagrind, solvers will be looking for a synonym of raptured rather than an anagram.
A clue should generally come in two distinct parts - definition and wordplay. They can be either way around but should both lead to the same answer. Solvers will always try to relate to one end of the clue or the other as the definition so here I was looking for a phrase meaning raptured, commonly, or possibly a colloquialism for nothing (i.e. "nothing commonly").
"Backing" is, as you suggest, redundant, as is "aviator" - there is no need to differentiate between alternative meanings of definition words.
I may, admittedly, be trying to push particularly British crossword rules here but I simply wouldn't have got this in a million years simply because it doesn't follow the rules.
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies if I got this wrong, I'm certainly no expert on CCC's but I thought an anagram required all the original letters from the word but in a different order as you describe. I was attempting to use letter substitution here with the 'loses' and 'gains' - the remaining letters from the original word are still in the original order?
I'll try something less complicated / wrong on Monday's CCC  .
|
|
|
|
|
Certainly no need for an apology! It kept me wondering all day and that's never a bad thing.
In programming terms it reminded me a bit of the old C compiler warning of "too many levels of indirection" - the wordplay should really lead directly to the solution rather than an abstraction of it - but, hey ... looking forward to Monday's clue!
|
|
|
|
|
Er .. um ... where to start? The principal problem here is that your wordplay only leads to a definition not to the answer. So we're required to solve a clue to get a clue. So whether your anagram indicator is there or not is slightly irrelevant. As said above, the basics of a cryptic clue (with a few exceptions) is definition plus wordplay. The definition should be directly synonymous with the answer. The wordplay should lead to a literal representation of the answer. So in this clue, if your wordplay leads to RAPTOR then RAPTOR must be the answer. You can't ask the solver to take a further leap from RAPTOR to BIRD OF PREY because you've given no grounds on which such a leap can reasonably be made no matter how close the association. It's a bit like giving someone the sum ...
2 +2 =
and only marking it correct if they give the answer as the square root of 16!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
LabVIEWstuff wrote: Looks like I'm back up for Monday
You are indeed!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm ready to read good and bad about CrunchBase.
Thanks for the voice of experience which anyone may have.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it anything like a crunchie bar[^]? Because I quite like them, but they are easy to make yourself...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
What is CrunchBase ? (yeah, I know, I could google it).
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
C-P-User-3 wrote: I'm ready to read good and bad about CrunchBase.
Congratulations. How long did the preparations take?
C-P-User-3 wrote: Thanks for the voice of experience which anyone may have.
Use a good light for reading, it's better for your eyes.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I like pizzas with crunchy bases, but not too crunchy.
|
|
|
|
|
So far, no responses that I can understand.
Is anyone else using CrunchBase ? Has it been worth anything to you ?
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
