|
Is your dvd-burner defect? 
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
What DVD burner? I use ISO as virtual disk...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I wonder who wrote that, who tested that and who approved that?
Didn't you know about quality of "cheap hindu coders"?  )) Viola! Now A WHOLE MICROSOFT is a hindu gang who hides behind famous company! Leave of Gates and Ballmer is not a "pity retire event", IT'S THE END of IT giant and hell knows how long MS will stay under Nadella management - doubt it will be long.
Win10 is again a big fail - after failed 8 and 8.1; So "desktop" division loose more and more. Even paid "Solitaire" won't help their agony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Then you give that money to the IRS and your ex-wife and your kid's private school education."
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
I thought there was the article at the bottom about Don McLean and American Pie was also quite interesting
|
|
|
|
|
How often are you reading an ebook on a tablet or kindle, and would like to send highlighted text to someone? Same, for me even more, when I hit a code sample on my Kindle, I would like to just tap and send to my PC.
I think I would be able to manage on my own, to send code blocks identified (contained in) a div with a data-can-share attribute, somehow extract the code, and send it to somewhere more useful. At the moment I'm looking for ideas, as all I can think of is email or IM (a special receiver in Visual Studio eventually). My first thought was Skype, but now MS is killing the Skype API, and I'd rather not invest in the old COM based on.
But right now I'm just looking for ideas and feedback on this idea from you guys.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a cool idea ! But, would you have legal issues with copyrighted material, and/or technical issues with copy-protected material, like a Kindle DRM protected file ?
cheers, Bill
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I would have legal issues, but example code allowed to be pushed to another device would have to be marked as such by the publisher, for technical reasons, but these could suffice for legal.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure you would. Code samples would surely come under fair use quotation rules? After all, unless you copy then into some kind of coding interface they're really not much use in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
Very good idea. I dont have any clue. But have high interest to know how are you going to do this!
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be starting experiments soon, very basic, from a web page code listing. Other mobile devices cone much later.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One question: In this picture, the Moon is between Earth and Sun. The camera is between Moon and Sun. Now, the Sun is illuminating both Moon and Earth. Should not the Moon be seen brighter than Earth; the Moon is closer to the Sun, and hence more brightly illuminated. However, the Moon is seen as dull, and the Earth as bright.
Can this apparent brightness of Earth be attributed to the blue water all around? Whereas Moon is without water, and may be absorbing more light than it reflects?
Is something not correct in the above argument?
|
|
|
|
|
Avijnata wrote: Can this apparent brightness of Earth be attributed to the blue water all around? Whereas Moon is without water, and may be absorbing more light than it reflects?
The reflectiveness of a planet or moon is called its Albedo. If it reflected nothing, it would have an albedo of 0; if it reflected everything, it would have an albedo of 1. The Earth has an albedo of 0.37 whereas the full moon has an albedo of 0.12. So, the Earth reflects about 3 times as much of the light as the moon does. That is why it is brighter in the picture. Your guess that it is the water (but includes clouds as well as oceans) that are the main reflecting agents is correct; on the moon you only have the surface dust etc (called the regolith).
|
|
|
|
|
Very nicely explained. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The reflectiveness of a planet or moon is called its Albedo
"planets or moon" only? No, sorry, Albedo is much more General 
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, yeah.
But it's really difficult to measure the albedo of a star or black hole... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Of a star not really, of a black hole yes...very difficult where limes likes to go
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It's probably the other way round: Albedo of a black hole[^]
But a star? The light emitted is so huge that it's going to be really difficult to spot the reflection, even if the star emitting it is pretty close!
That's my guess, anyway.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I agree. But fact is Albedo of stars are Facts, Albedo of black hole are theory, at this time. Also looking Forward to really prove the later ones 
Not really the final explanation, but also not the worst one, for an overview good enough:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo[^]
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Very good answer, the only thing is that clouds typically have a far greater albedo than the oceans.
Cheers,
विक्रम
"We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread 
|
|
|
|
|
So does the Moon absorb more energy than the Earth. We know it doesn't so what happens?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
