|
The straight line is something they have just photoshopped onto the map for quick reference. The map shown has been digitally warped to remove the effect of the curvature of the earth, so the straight line shown isn't how a straight path would appear in "real life", thus the flight path may appear less like the "straight line" path than it otherwise would. Nothing so far as indicated that the path was anything other than normal, but many have reported the altitude was not normal.
|
|
|
|
|
I know that, its just it seems to be a big curve, bigger than I would have expected, if asked I would not have expected that a flight between Spain and northern Germany would fly across Switzerland, I am not saying there is anything fishy about it just unexpected
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
No problem, thought you were going to be one of those tedious bores who are no doubt already posting on the internet that the plane was brought down by "the government" 
|
|
|
|
|
I am not saying it was aliens but IT WAS ALIENS
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
... it was aliens who were sent by the government.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: Horrible plane crash in French Alps
Such a shame it wasn't one of those "nice plane crashes"
|
|
|
|
|
There are different degrees of horrible, and Captain Sullenberger's emergency landing of a plane (similar to this one, btw) on the Hudson River in 2009 - where all passengers were saved - was definitely a nicer plane crash than this one...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
what like that one in the US a couple of weeks ago where they all walked away?
I would prefer a nice one to a horrible one every time, much more chance of survival
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Take it to GIT, please... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe England should send an actual team to the next one rather than 11 blokes they found in the local pub
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't be daft.
Eleven blokes found in a local pub can play better than the England team*.
* You can pick any sport to apply that to.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
 Agreed!!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Eleven blokes found in a local pub can play better than the England team*.
I'm not a cricket fan and I don't know who played whom, but my guess is that both winners and losers can now be found in a local pub.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
I've been used to have a desktop and a laptop, it is wonderful for some things and a "nightmare" for other things.
Now I've changed my desktop and I'll have only a powerful Lenovo laptop and no desktop. the laptop is connected to a USB 3.0 Lenovo docking station.
I hope now I'll be able to find everything at the first attempt as no more sync folders will be needed... Only the laptop, the server and subversion.
Note:
I've chosen that USB based docking station because usually when I'm on the move the laptop lies in dirt tables and the bottom connector could become dirt.
In the docking station I've plugged:
1. USB mouse.
2. USB keyboard.
3. USB 3.0 HDD.
4. USB 3.0 DVD burner.
5. DVI 24" display.
6. DVI 24" display.
7. Audio speakers.
All in all I can see it working, but it is not as smooth as I would like to: mouse seems responsive, some keys are missed (but I'm not sure if the keyboard change is the reason for that, not me of course), ... but the thing that is not as smooth as it should be is when I move any window in the 24" displays: it is a little bit "jumpy".
I've downloaded:
- the latest DisplayLink drivers for Windows 7.
- the latest USB 3.0 host controller driver.
I've set the performance options in the laptop to be at full while on power.
Both things have improved a lot the behavior (before doing that the mouse was also jumping!).
Anyone here has faced this kind of thing and got a completely responsive device? if so... how have you done it?
And in case none of you have been here, what would you try?
As always thank you in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying that your displays are driven via USB?
USB 3 is 5Gb/s
DVI 4.95 Gb/s
You have 2 x dvi plus the rest - so there's no surprise performance is an issue!
Even assuming USB 3.1 (10Gb/s i) it's an obvious issue!
Of course, you're not necessarily using the full bandwidth (depends on screen resolution etc.) but still .. pushing it to the limits!
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: Are you saying that your displays are driven via USB?
Yes, the device is this one: http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/documents/pd023761[^]
And it is designed to connect two DVI displays onto it through USB 3.0...
Seeing your post I've just disabled one of the external DVI displays and no change has been noticed... 
|
|
|
|
|
I guess depending on the resolution of the monitor (and the refresh rate) you can calculate the bandwidth required for the display
You can estimate the bandwidth required for the network if its in use.
I've read reviews of other USB docking stations having display lag issues - I guess because of bandwidth problems; personally I'd try connecting the monitor straight to the laptop and make sure there's no issue there, then disconnect everything but the monitor and on the docking station and see what that runs like.
But it certainly looks to me like it's an ambitious concept to shove more data down a pipe than it has room for - only one way to do that is to slow down!
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Yep... what you say seems more than logic...
But see those[^] guys (yes I know they are salesmen...).
|
|
|
|
|
There are loads of people having similar problems to you - and loads of suggestions for solutions, with no definitive answer that I could see after a quick google 
The technology, if I understand it, involves rendering the screen in software, compressing it, sending down through USB to the device which then displays it via a USB Video card - so there's a bit of processing at both ends which is likely to be the cause of lag.
My only suggestion is to keep googling and trying suggestions to see what works for you and, if there's no luck, take it back.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's what I'll do... but as you say there are lot's of suggestions and I've tried a few of them without luck...
One of the worst things is the capability of my new keyboard to forget a key press sometime... 
I probably should have chosen the normal docking station which moreover would have plugged my laptop at the same time...
Thank you for your posts! 
|
|
|
|
|
At 1080p you're using ~3Gbps/monitor[^]. The jank itself is probably more due to the nature of USB itself. Unlike Thunderbolt (or FireWire before it), USB was designed to be as cheap as possible to implement; not to maintain the maximum possible QoS levels. I saw claims that USB3 was supposed to be better in that regard; but it appears that they were just elephant droppings. Or it could just be that Joan's dock has an elephanting bad design I suppose. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - uncompressed that takes it over USB 3.0 speeds with jus the monitors. My guess is the compression / decompression allows it to work, but is the cause of jerkiness and/or artefacts.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
And the laptop has USB 3.0 ports as well, right? How many?
Although I read your reply that disabling one of the monitors didn't affect the jumpiness of moving a window around, I can't help but wonder what would happen if, say, you connected one or more of the devices that's hanging off the hub directly to a USB port on your laptop? Of course, I think the laptop just implements a hub anyways, but this way you're taking (maybe) some of the workload off the external hub. Who knows. I guess it's something I'd try.
What's the USB-DVI adapter you're using? I've got an old Kingston DisplayLink device that I've never had problems with!
Marc
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
