|
No - silly.
I'm the one with the black lipstick to match my nails and scarf.
I'll let it go at that since everyone knows that fashion sense (red lipstick) is different for stalkers, so you didn't know any better.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
They still do that?
Haven't been to the post office in a while.
Then I can get their alias as well, and then look them up
|
|
|
|
|
There is no direct way: your log in is your email, and the hamsters aren't going to give those out - thankfully - so there is no way to search for a user by login. Which just leaves the username, and that doesn't have to bear any relationship to the email address or "real world" name you already have. You could check back in your history if you know roughly when they helped you?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
That's a good idea. Wonder if the history goes that far back.
OK, I'll just go along with my first thought of them being a member here, and accept the connection.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: or "real world" name you already have
... e.g., I have it on good authority (DD) that Griff's real name is Ethel Crudacre.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upper-case tags? How 90s. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
No, you need to use the <EM> tag !
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: you need to use the <EM> tag !
I second that! So many web devs still using <i> tag. Even right here on little ol' CP. 
|
|
|
|
|
newton.saber wrote: Even right here on little ol' CP
Whenever I try to use <em> in an article it gets replaced. 
|
|
|
|
|
In the online editor? With the default config, it should be the other way round - <i> should be replaced with <em>.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: In the online editor?
No. I write in Notepad and email them.
Richard Deeming wrote: <i> should be replaced with <em>.
I've never seen that happen, but maybe I'll try to be more observant in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: No. I write in Notepad and email them.
Ah - it's human hamster error then. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly. I'm fairly sure they pass articles through a filter upon arrival that way.
|
|
|
|
|
"em" is way too verbose. Em prefer the good ol' "i".
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
You're imagining things.
I thought em predated i.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 11-Feb-15 0:30am.
|
|
|
|
|
em is preferred since HTML 4.01. ≪I> has been there since before CSS. All tags are suggestions to the renderer and as such the suggestion is EMphasis. ≪b> should be replaced with strong also.
|
|
|
|
|
You are all wrong. a <span style="font-style: italic"> is the way to go!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I do agree with you. Styling should be in CSS.
|
|
|
|
|
em is not a replacement for i, they have semantically different meanings. It's the specific scenario that dictates preference.
|
|
|
|
|
The <i> tag is actually more appropriate here, since it is still the element to be used for typographically italicized text i.e. text that is just in italic without any semantics to it whatsoever. <em> is meant to be used for emphasis/stressing.
|
|
|
|
|
szukuro wrote: <em> is meant to be used for emphasis/stressing
Exactly, and the browser should decide how to do that. Not every system can italicize; some may need to make the text blink instead. 
|
|
|
|
|
Actually am 'icebow'. out walking in bright sun, high ish, on a cold day, and noticed an upside down rain bow in the sky. High up. Looking closer, noticed there were two circular rainbows around the sun, and off the top of each, a cup shaped inverted rainbow.
The inner icebow round the sun had two bright spots too. Here is th eclosest pic I can find to it:
https://nsidc.org/sites/nsidc.org/files/images//sun-dog-lg.jpg[^]
It was really quite funky.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
