|
Bug ending up as a feature?
|
|
|
|
|
Um, I'd look in the direction of Android, first.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
First smart phone? Just joking.
Anyhow, go to your settings. Some aspects of the phone are Samsung and some are Verizon. For instance, I have a Note 4. I can either use the messaging service via Samsung or Verizon, but not both. I tell the phone this in the settings section.
If this is your first real smart phone, then it can take some getting used to. It can be frustrating at first. With all this said, I love my phone; and it took a while to get used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Some aspects of the phone are Samsung and some are Verizon
The ringer volume?
I sincerely doubt that either of them have anything to do with it. I'd bet that android forums have the solution.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If you have to go to the forums to learn how to use your phone, then either you shouldn't be using a smart phone, or the phone was designed by retarded oompa-loompas. That is my strong opinion on this matter.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: That is my strong opinion on this matter
Proof that even very bad opinions can be strongly held.
How's this:
"If you have to go to the forums to learn how to use your programming language, then either you shouldn't be a developer, or the documentation is cr@p."
How you can sit there and comment to a help forum that people who use help forums are idiots, I don't know. I can only pretend to be that dumb.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, Mark Wallace, your phone is "supposed" to be intuitive and easy to use for the "average" person. For you to even draw a comparison between the phone and a complex programming language, is just silly.
This is the lounge, not a help forum.
My point is that I and many, many, many, people that I personally know, young and over 50, have never had to use the forums to learn how to control the volume on their phone. You should not need any help with the basic functions of your phone. So to my comment, either you should not be using smart phones or they were designed by retarded oompa-loompas.
I have been using Samsung smart phones for a handful of years now, and have never had to go to the forums for anything on my phone; nothing.
You and I have butt heads on many topics over the last few years, this debate is no different.
Cheers. 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, yes. Android is perfect, and never has any bugs.
How about the thousands of people who were locked out of wifi because of a ridiculous bug in the android time server software?
The workaround for that *bug* -- which, let us remember, prevented people using wifi! -- was found and reported by a forum user.
How about the thousands of other people who have gone to the android forums to find -- and have found -- workarounds for other *bugs* in the various versions of the android OS?
The solution for the problem reported here may be one of several things, all of which are discussed on the android forums, because this problem affects many people.
The search string android forum phone keeps going to silent mode, brings up lots of such discussions about this particular problem, each of which has either a solution or a workaround, which is far more useful than the responses here, in a forum which is primarily populated by Windows developers.
Let's be clear:
Saying "this is how to fix that problem" is far more useful an answer than "you should be able to use computer that's disguised as a phone without help".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Roger isn't asking about how to simply adjust the volume. He's asking about an anomaly that strikes me as most counter-intuitive, i.e the device 'randomly' switching from ring to vibrate. Maybe you could be more constructive and cite the section for Android help that addresses this peculiarity. I've only ever seen my Android manuals quickly gloss over how to intentionally adjust the ringer volume, or change the ring mode.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
That's an arrogant asswipe attitude.
#SupportHeForShe If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
Only 2 things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
It's not this[^], is it?
I'd have to say that that ranks as one of the stupider and least intuitive "handy features" that can be added to a phone.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, but it was worth a look. Thanks!
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I would first try Verizon Tech Support.
|
|
|
|
|
Very Freaky![^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I find all marketing freaky.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I find that web site freaky, started popping dialogs at me, I'm outta here, forget the story...
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
my assembly is .NET user control in C#. after I obfuscate it, I want to check how good is the obfuscation. So I used Red-gate Reflector to check class, method etc.
What is your way to check the quality of obfuscation of a .net assembly?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
That wouldn't really work, unless you have Reflexil and deobfuscate first. Also try some stand-alone deobfuscators.
If the decompiled code still sucks after that, then ok. If not, then any script kiddie can undo the obfuscation that you hopefully didn't pay too much for.
|
|
|
|
|
great info. thanks a million.
could you name a few stand-alone deobfuscators?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
From what I've read, de4dot[^] is probably the top dog deobfuscator or at least among them.
|
|
|
|
|
thanks. it is great tool.
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i think that's a viewer, not a deobfuscator.
|
|
|
|
|
ILSpy is the open-source .NET assembly browser and decompiler.
If you have a c# DLL File or EXE, you can save decompiled assembly as .csproj and Assembly as C# Project.
NKS
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
