|
|
You got at least two options...
1. Seriously, for $10 a month you can host your own at Dreamhost[^] or just about most web hosts.
2. Or, to be even more simple, get a pro Dropbox account for $10 a month. Have your local repo sit anywhere you want and push it to the master repo which sits in your drop box folder. 1TB of space goes a long way, especially if you don't have that many images.
Otherwise, go open source, that's when things become free.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
It's not a huge amount, maybe I'll look at dropbox, thanks Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't have any images and not too much code, the free account[^] is 2GB. That goes a long way with a compressed source repo.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
not a huge about!!! but Nagy its a whole bottle of gin
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
There are no whole bottles, just lots and lots of empties 
|
|
|
|
|
I use bitbucket for about 30 small private repos and haven't had any problems.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a windows 2003 server at my computer repair shop that is on a static ip and domain.
I am running VisualSVN (free) server on it and VisualSVN (free) Visual Studio client.
I commit to that. and the server is backed up each night.
Works like a charm with NO RECURRING CLOUD CHARGE. Just the way I like it. 
|
|
|
|
|
In yer left sock.
Except on the 3rd Thursday of every Quarter. Put it in your right pocket, then.
Either that, or put it on a CubeStat. Linky[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I've never tried it but could you not book a Linux VPS and install GIT[^] on it?
...it at least would be pretty obscure and hard to find unlike those public Git repositories which are basically social networks.
If you had decent bandwidth where you're at you could just install on your own box or run it in a Hyper-V VM...
|
|
|
|
|
Cloudforge[^] have been very good for me.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
I have just started using GitLab and all is good for me at the moment. It's ads-free and and you can have virtually unlimited public and private repos. It only supports Git for version control, though.
Whether I think I can, or think I can't, I am always bloody right!
|
|
|
|
|
VSO?
I use their Git for my personal projects. It's especially nice because it's well-integrated with VS2013.
|
|
|
|
|
I might be a bit bias as I am moving to Sydney to start work at Atlassian (The guys behind bitbucket) in a couple of months, but I keep several projects on bitbucket and have never had a problem. 
|
|
|
|
|
I use Assembla[^], it features 1 Project, Unlimited Users, Unlimited Repositories and 500mb Storage for free.
Fits my needs as I can make subfolders if I want to host more than one project. It only gets in the way if you want to manage teams that differ between projects.
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
----
Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
|
|
|
|
|
I really like BitBucket.org. Very easy to use, especially if you also use their Git client, SourceTree.
|
|
|
|
|
I use assembla (www.assembla.com), they have a free plan with unlimited repository and a free private project.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday I bought new laptop which comes with Windows 8.1 64 bit edition. I'm able to install, run both 32 & 64 bit softwares(Ex. VLC). Which is recommended? 32 or 64 bits? Reason(s) please.
In my old laptop, already I have a big collection(around 5-7GBs) of 32 bit softwares. So if 64 bit is recommended, I'll download 64 bit versions of those softwares. Else, I'll use the same collection from my old laptop.
Based on my search I got few results on 64 bit like Memory allocation(not limited to 4GB), Don't support old drivers(32 bits), etc.,
Your opinions please. Thank you.
This is the first time I use 64 bit OS for my personal use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: 64, because you can you're worth it
FTFY 
|
|
|
|
|
Mika Wendelius wrote:
64, because you can you're worth it you're good enough, you're smart enough, and doggonit people like like you.
|
|
|
|
|
As far as i know you should stay with 64x because you can, 32bit sw should run on it too, so why even think about grading down ?
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
HobbyProggy wrote: so why even think about grading down ?
I'm new to 64 bit so this thread
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I know given you can process 64 bits at once it would be better staying at 64 versions...
i.e. I'm using handbrake and MKVMerge GUI to process films to be able to see them on the smarttv... with 64 bits versions everything goes smoother and faster.
Enjoy! 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
