|
Marc Clifton wrote: by reducing the world's population to a more sustainable level
People who want to reduce the world's population should start with themselves. Any volunteers?
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, and people who want to solve world hunger should just eat. Much as people like to believe that contributing on a small scale changes anything, it really doesn't. Meaningful change starts with organization, rallying, politics, not with insignificant ants. Convincing ten other people is ten times as effective as just doing it yourself, whatever "it" is.
Also, that's not what Marc wrote, he wrote that it will happen (automatically), not that he wants it to happen or that he wants it to be done (actively).
|
|
|
|
|
Malthus was a clear thinker, wasn't he? 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Poor little bvggers have the odds against them
1) the varroa mite (not yet here in the south of the planet)
2) climate change
3) pesticides
considering that bees are a necessity to produce food for us humans, you'd think we had better plans by now - then again, we think we're the smartest thing on the planet, and that's plainly not true
|
|
|
|
|
Considering that the bees are responsible for a significant portion of the pollination of many plants, a bee die-off would precede a large plant die-off as well.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
yeah - that's sorta what I meant by "bees are a necessity to produce food for us humans", but, looking at your comment, it goes further than us humans
|
|
|
|
|
Garth J Lancaster wrote: not yet here in the south of the planet
Producing a shortage here nevertheless because they are now being exported in huge numbers to make up for losses in the northern hemisphere.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shambles?[^]
2 years to go and only 10% complete.
I see trouble ahead.
Every four years the worlds greatest athletes descend upon one country to compete for the ultimate prize.
Then, two years later there is an Olympic Games.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
This happens at nearly every event. I remember the stories that England might step in to host the 2010 WC as South Africa were way behind schedule (England already having enough stadiums with the required capacity). I think there were more about the Brazil WC this year.
The 2016 Olympics will definitely take place in Rio.
|
|
|
|
|
Anywhere's better than SA.
Vuvu-f#*ing-zelas.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure the marketing b'tards from hell good people of Brazil will come up with something 'ethnic' to psii of the rest of the World and give the home team a double advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
Well I for one look forward to the Women's Brazillian Waxing context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was soccer. And vuvuzelas were great.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't that be 1 year later?
One day I aspire to having a signature.
|
|
|
|
|
their, there, they're
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand you're post. Your sure you didn't miss anything? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
und wile your at it, hav a goe at the speling Nazis to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nazi's?
Why the apostrophe?
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Very good.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
V'e'r'y' g'o'o'd'.'
I think you'll find 
|
|
|
|
|
It's "who's" and "whose" I still to this day struggle with. A sort of who's whose of difficult words if you will.
But at least I can spell 'lose' whereas 90% of the internet seem to write 'loose'.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
