|
OriginalGriff wrote: Leaving control names at the VS default
I do that sometimes, mostly with container controls I don't reference in the code. I often get weird build errors if I set the 'Create a variable' option (or whatever that option is called, no VS instance open right now to check) to false, so I don't usually do that. I have no idea why, and it only happens with certain types of controls (e.g. Panel, Table Layout Panel, etc.)
VS is weird sometimes.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
But if you are only scanning the code you can focus on the green lines instead of running an in-memory compiler 
|
|
|
|
|
ctrl-c/ctrl-v
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
I am currently working on something that has massive presence of #1, 2 and 4. Other than that I totally hate if someone mixes up naming conventions. I have my favorites but I am OK with any convention. Just stick to single bloody way.
Other than that, for some reason, heavily parameterized methods and constructors to bother me. I also totally hate logic and calculations in constructors (unless that is really needed).
|
|
|
|
|
Not sealing classes by default/crazy overuse of inheritance
Just because something needs something else doesn't mean it is a base class of that other thing, I think in a modern programming language you rarely actually need to use inheritance
Also, Code that does nothing, but hasn't been taken out of the project, eugh
I rarely comment my code unless I am doing something weird, I assume the next developer will be at least as smart as me, if not much much smarter (likely)
I might use o as a variable name if I'm maybe inside a for loop inside another for loop (using i for the outer one), everybody should know what for(var i = 0; i < blah; i++) means, anything more descriptive is a waste of keystrokes
Everything else I agree with
|
|
|
|
|
Use of var is justifiable? In my useless opinion, var is useless in .Net framework World.
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree, in a situation like:
CryptographicUnexpectedOperationException exception = new CryptographicUnexpectedOperationException();
I find this more readable:
var exception = new CryptographicUnexpectedOperationException();
Typing CryptographicUnexpectedOperationException twice in such a short space I think is a bit redundant
|
|
|
|
|
Intellisense does help. For reading, indentation is something I would prefer. It is opinion. I think MS wants to divide and rule. When did Britishers took over MS?
*Last 2 sentences are supposed to be humor.
|
|
|
|
|
d@nish wrote: When did Britishers took over MS?
We didn't. If we had, the Color class would be spelled properly!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Wait, that explains it. Those who have trouble typing a "u", can not type IEnumerable< Whatever the hell it is >. I now know the whole purpose of var. Enlightened.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a pity that we can't use a condensed "new" format like:
CryptographicUnexpectedOperationException exception = new ();
which means the same as:
CryptographicUnexpectedOperationException exception = new CryptographicUnexpectedOperationException();
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
var is handy in two places:
1) When using Linq and returning "An IEnumerable of something, gawddammit, but I have no idea what the compiler is going to call it"
2) To identify people whose code you can't trust because they have no idea or no interest in what type a variable should be. It may save five keystrokes to use var instead of IEnumerable<Customer> but it doesn't help understanding when you have to read the code later.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: To identify people whose code you can't trust
|
|
|
|
|
I use var when I have some method to call that returns a humungously long-named type. I then immediately change it with the "Make Explicit" option. That way I don't have to type it out in full or select from a potentially huge list of intellisense suggestions.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Fine by me - it doesn't leave the var in the final code, or treat C# as if it was VB and "don't know, don't care" Dim
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
That var is obviously an int, and you didn't even save any characters there..
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't waste any characters either 
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm.. OK fine, I'll accept that excuse.
This time.
|
|
|
|
|
HomerTheGreat wrote: I assume the next developer will be at least as smart as me, if not much much smarter (likely)
Not so. You have business knowledge that you will have accumulated over time. You shouldn't need to comment straight forward code to tell the future devs technically what it is doing, but to explain the business reasons behind it.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Misspelled identifiers.
Inconsistent naming for related items.
C++ header files that group things by their access method (public:, protected:, private:) rather than putting related items together.
Hungarian notation should die in a fire.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. I agree with Joel but I stand by my dislike of the common Hungarian notation, despite Simonyi's original intent.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, that's a very interesting article - I never new the Hunagrian notation was meant to be like that.
And I actually like it: It could be an easy way to improve the legibility of old legacy code by means of a simple Rename, and it could be done incrementally, at our own pace, without need to set aside extra time for refactoring.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
Comments like this:
i=6; //set i to six
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
My main bug bears are
1. Excessive whitespace between code lines
2. In code comment,for that complex method that are so short they are as useful as the var keyword.
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
