|
Even stranger, it's something I discovered on Tuesday dring a talk on the East India Company.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, that is really strange... 
You discovered it on Tuesday, i did it yesterday, and Bergholt discovered it today...
Great "Learnig Curve"  
|
|
|
|
|
It's in my ToDo list for me to learn tomorrow.
What ever it is.
Never underestimate the power of stupid things in large numbers
--- Serious Sam
|
|
|
|
|
You live and learn...
|
|
|
|
|
And day after tomorrow, it's me.
|
|
|
|
|
Shameel wrote: day after tomorrow
It will be Saturday, I will have a break..
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
You don't waste a working day to learn nothing, do you?
|
|
|
|
|
I discovered this on Tuesday, during a presentation whch was primarily about the East India Company. Where did you hear about it?
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
someone mentioned it and when I checked they were right (and its going to cost me a pint)
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm confused...
from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_tea_party[^]
[-- In 1767, to help the East India Company compete with smuggled Dutch tea, Parliament passed the Indemnity Act, which lowered the tax on tea consumed in Great Britain, and gave the East India Company a refund of the 25% duty on tea that was re-exported to the colonies.[12] To help offset this loss of government revenue, Parliament also passed the Townshend Revenue Act of 1767, which levied new taxes, including one on tea, in the colonies. --]
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't trust Wikipedia, I mean look at Ian Botham.
|
|
|
|
|
And that's not even to mention Stephen Hawking or Clyde_McPhatter.
|
|
|
|
|
Why did they get mad about that?
|
|
|
|
|
The hatter probably had mercury poisoning
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
It was the smugglers who got mad because the changes put them out of business.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
The politics of contraband? The smugglers' blues?
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I think I started the WWI thing yesterday, I am amazed at the number of things I was taught that were wrong by both the politically correct left & the some near fascist teachers. I mean I was brought up with one view of WWI read some stuff and found that was wrong, read/saw some more stuff and versions were different I came to the conclusion there is no right or wrong answer, it happened get over it!. Mind you to use a quote "Those who do know history, are doomed to repeat it"
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork wrote: Yeah, I think I started the WWI thing yesterday
Hey man, that's not cool. I'm usually pretty tolerant, but starting world wars is where I draw the line.
|
|
|
|
|
Like dude, I'm sorry man, I just thought...well it got out hand, you know man, one dude wants this one dude wants that... 
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: the Boston Tea Party occured because us Brits LIFTED the import tax!
You may have lifted the tax on yourselves but you imposed additional taxes on the colonies.
The Townshend Revenue Act[^]
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
but that was repealed in 1770 3 years before the boston tea party
the point was that due to the removal of tax (even if in Britain) the price of tea in the colonies was LESS than it had been, in fact was actually cheaper than smuggled tea and it was this that instigated the tea party
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: but that was repealed in 1770
1) It was only partially repealed. The taxes on tea remained. 2) Smuggled tea (despite potentially higher price) had no taxes. The Tea Party was an act based on ideals. The colonists did not want to pay British taxes without representation in British parliament. 3) The Tea Party was NOT an effort to protect smugglers. 
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
thats debateable as the people involved were I understand those exact smugglers, however one of the main disagreement seems to be prominately missing, that being the law passed to prevent eastward expansion into native american land, I understand this was one of the biggies at the time yet seems to be overlooked
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you need to read up on "The Sons of Liberty". Mostly lawyers, doctors and businessmen.
Anyway, it doesn't matter. We won the war so we get to write the history.
That's how it works - right?
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: thats debateable as the people involved were I understand those exact smugglers
As it is with the vast majority of things involving humans it is never a simple explanation. Simple explanations exist because the complete ones do not and because ones that attempt to get close to complete are way too long to do anything but read once and then forget.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
