|
OriginalGriff wrote: Or Apple users assume their device is totally secure (because Apple says it is) and don't report it.
Or "selective reporting" by the statistics compilers.
what part of "...non-reporting for some reason ..." don't those fall under. 
OriginalGriff wrote: It's more likely that phone sellers use "blocks" of mobile numbers so the next 100,000 will all be Android, say. If the spammers are just shotgun targeting pseudorandom numbers that would distort the figures as well.
 I've never heard any claim of phone numbers being assigned by device type before; and except for numbers being handed out to kids now, most cell numbers predate android and iOS. If they were assigned by device type for some reason it'd've been Palm, blackberry, flipphone, etc; groups that I'd expect to have negligible correlation with modern OS preferences.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: I've never heard any claim of phone numbers being assigned by device type before
What about by vendor and then by business division?
I can't speak to the market now but I know specifically, by first hand knowledge, that at one time vendors did request numbers by block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collin Jasnoch wrote: I think they also said it was Android 2.3
Isn't that like saying that most of the malicious software found on the PC is running on Windows 2000XP?
Not quite. PS FTFY.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
|
2k is basically gone from the market; so however bad it was it doesn't really count anymore. If you wanted to assign it to an Android version I'd go with 2.0 or maybe 1.6 (1.x is win9x). XP and 2.3 are both pathetically old versions that have appallingly high residual marketshare so I think the match fits better than to 2k.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory.Gadow wrote: Some 79% of malicious attacks
I haven't read the article, but from the quote... it doesn't say anything about successful attacks. So, there isn't anything really useful discovered here.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't this number based upon an evaluation of the app store? 
|
|
|
|
|
And 50% of those attacks are phishing attacks that have nothing to with Android. 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Spot on. It's just a volume thing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That's not terribly surprising, since Android accounts for about 79% of phones[^]. 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
"There is no such thing as coincidence"
There must be. Apple says so.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So most attackers target Windows computers and android phones?
I wonder what possible reason there could be for that. There must be a logical reason, no?
BTW, "attack" does not mean "victory". Precious few devices are unprotected.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
During one of searches for more recent news on Google Glass I came upon this article;
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57600144-71/its-war-siri-mocks-google-glass/[^]
Basically it explains how Siri now smack talks Google Glass / Abuses its user if you say "OK Glass" into Siri. We tried this in the office during lunch and laughed our arses off. Entertaining and usually I'm on the side of Android, but I found this funny so +1 to the fruity firm(Apple).
Simon Lee Shugar (Software Developer)
www.simonshugar.co.uk
"If something goes by a false name, would it mean that thing is fake? False by nature?" By Gilbert Durandil
|
|
|
|
|
Latest news:
The most-used siri commands:
- "OK Glass" (94.1%).
- "Boobies" (4.1%)
- "This is really cool, you can talk to it" (1.1%)
- "Oh, I pressed the button by accident" (0.59%)
- (no message) (0.2%)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
STAR 3 Robot[^]
This neat little robot was built using 3-D printing, and is capable of sliding under doors, righting itself after a fall, and quite a few other nifty tricks.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Very cute - if slightly creepy...
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
Only slightly? I find it intensely creepy, as I envision all the ways it could be used to invade one's privacy. NSA will probably classify it, then buy up the rights for a song and throw the inventors in a deep pit.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I probably don't have enough imagination to be seriously creeped out. It was just the thought of it sliding itself under a door armed with a camera...heck, I shut doors because I don't want some/any people on my side!
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if we could mount a tiny laser on that thing, then use it to hunt cockroaches late at night?
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome could be a cat aggravater also.
|
|
|
|
|
Even better!!
And I just remembered that the geckos on my porch will chase a red laser, so we could use this thing to train them to chase cats. I wonder how many geckos it would take to bring down an average tabby and eat it?
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
A laser guided tabby eatin Geico, has a nice ring to it. If Apple ain't got a patent I'd say we're good to go! 
|
|
|
|
|
iLOGIC ~ i Laser Optional Geico Ingesting Cat
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
