|
You don't know SAP stands for South's Always Painful?
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
In that case, you might need some of this: Preparation H[^]
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Should I apply this on client side or server side?
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Right between them.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking of putting a wrapper around server and applying this through visitor pattern on client side. This should give a nice little plug and play design.
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Get a room you two.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
SAP and WCF are curse words which should have been censored in your post.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm in France and listening online, there's a long (very long) section with a "Rights Restrictions" message rather than the radio, which is substantially rarer than hen's teeth on Radio 4.
So, is it an error or is there something very funky on R4 right now?
|
|
|
|
|
Warning C4715: not all control paths return a value
I remember when only the .NET languages had this warning/error, now they put it into the C++ compiler in VS 2012! Yea!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it worth updating to 2012 yet? I'm running 2010 and it's perfectly fine. Anything significant I should think about? I know Roslyn[^] only runs in 2012.
Also, I don't seem to ever encounter the sorts of problems people on here seem to, perhaps I don't have big enough projects
.-.
|o,o|
,| _\=/_ .-""-.
||/_/_\_\ /[] _ _\
|_/|(_)|\\ _|_o_LII|_
\._. |\_/|"` |_| ==== |_|
|_|_| ||" || ||
|-|-| ||LI o ||
|_|_| ||'----'||
/_/ \_\ /__| |__\
|
|
|
|
|
2012 does seem more responsive and uses less memory. But the strongest reason for upgrading is the C++11 complaint compiler.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: complaint compiler
It might complain about a few things based on your code, but it's also C++11 compliant!
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Freudian slip, I guess!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
One big initial problem with VS2012 was that native C++ code could not target XP machines. Big show stopper if you have customers still using XP in some cases. That's been resolved with an update though.
The improved C++11 support would be a nice reason to upgrade.
I find, even with 2010, that it has issues at times with really large projects. Doing classwizard-type things (adding dialog member variables is a big one) will choke with really large projects - the UI just hangs. I keep thinking it'll get better with the next release, so maybe with 2012 I get the impression they do all their testing with trivially small test projects and don't really work with any larger scale solutions with large projects.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Calkins wrote: I get the impression they do all their testing with trivially small test projects
MS test?
I never knew...
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
That warning has been around for a while. Perhaps VS 2012 moved it to level 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It does say at the top "See blah blah blah" for the complete example. It takes you to a page to download the complete demo. I suspect that the snippet they are showing is an extract from a function and hence probably notifies the caller that all was ok. The comment for that part you refer states "// If a match for a plug-in serializer was found,
// use it to output and store the document." so it is probably telling the caller that the output was stored ok. (True)
Maybe you can download the full example, look at the code and tell us what you find...
|
|
|
|
|
BCMI - A Brain Computer Mouse Interface to enhance accessibility[^].
I've kept away from the app innovation contest but this looks great; just a good idea that will be excellent if he gets it working.
Caveat: I have no connection with the author: article just caught my eye and I love the idea.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
As the saying goes "If you're going to rob a bank rob a big one".
It's definitely an ambitious project.
|
|
|
|
|
I have worked extensively with brain signals aka EEG.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0Bka_9GxIQ[^]
There are 62 points on our head which acquires the signal. So you have basically 62 waveforms. Any change in thought gives rise to a wave pattern we call delta signal. Extracting the coordinate that you think where mouse should move is simply not possible with current development of EEG signal processing and Neuro signalling. I have published several research papers on ECG and EEG. So I can say, it is not ambitious project, it is impossible project.
Neuro bands are now commercially available. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHj73D2xk4s[^]
The best one can do is acquire the waveform and create a training module using something called support vector machine to classify the patterns. So if you are thinking 'play music' the pattern will repeat. However important thing to note here is our brain process several thoughts simultaneously. So that pattern will always be lost in cloud of other signals. Hence it would require an immense level of filtering to track the pattern.
To me therefore, that project would never see the light. Well, I do not want to sound pessimistic, but reality is we do not still have any filters proposed in any literature that does thin mapping. So yes, idea is nice. But voting for this really makes no sense, atleast to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks: that is interesting: perhaps you could tell all of that to the author. Shame: sounded good to me but my knowledge of the matter is, at best, fanciful so I voted for the idea, not the implementation.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
... and more importantly: It can fly again. It's motor had died and a replacement was hard to get.
What I'm talking about? This[^] is a Blade Nano CPX, one of the smallest little helicopers. No more than 7.75 inches long, but capable of more than a 'real' helicopter can do, like flying upside down.
On the picture you can also see the old motor, one of its batteries and the not yet installed new landing gear. And yes, the new motor works well. After taking the picture I had a short test flight through the room.
I have no video, but found this one[^].
The little heli may be hard to fly, but it's a great trainer. It can survive a crash with little damage and is easy to repair. A new set of blades or even a new motor do not cost much.
Are there any other heli pilots here?
Sent from my BatComputer via HAL 9000 and M5
|
|
|
|
|
I have been thinking of getting a quad copter but spent all my spare money that I'll have for a while on camera upgrades. But would love to fool with a quad at some point.
|
|
|
|