|
... when you walk barefoot on the lawn, and it still burns the soles of your feet.
Cheers,
Mick
------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter how often or hard you fall on your arse, eventually you'll roll over and land on your feet.
|
|
|
|
|
Midi_Mick wrote: fall on your arse
This must not happen then.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Just means that you'll land on you feet that bit little more quickly.
Cheers,
Mick
------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter how often or hard you fall on your arse, eventually you'll roll over and land on your feet.
|
|
|
|
|
And you know it's snowing in Belgium when traffic jams are suddenly 5 times higher than usual  .
|
|
|
|
|
Never mind — I got the fix, and understood the definition as I knew of it was correct. Good night! 
I know either because of the fact that I am sleepy at the moment, or I am not a native English speaker, I am unable to understand the meaning of swap. (I did try Google.)
I am actually working on Azure App Services, I also happen to have an event on 14th January about ASP.NET Core deployment on Azure App Services. One thing that I came across was Deployment Slots. Concept seems to be really easy, you create an extra application — similar to your actual one, same environment, same everything, just not public — and then you swap it once you are happy with the recent deployment.
Until now I was "believing", by this swap functionality, Azure will actually move A → B and at the same time would make A ← B so that they are interchanged. After so much time, I came to know that it was merely a copy of B to A (A is the production environment). Meaning, data of B was copied to A and data of A (previous build) was lost. No backup.
Which makes me think, where does that roll back sh*t comes from? Where should I roll my data or application back to, if there is no previous state at all? That would either require me to keep swapping apps to each other and have that variable C as temp variable, we used to have in C++.
Anyways, my question still lives, is this what swapping means? — just copying.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
modified 12-Jan-17 18:36pm.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a good chance that you understand "swap" better than Microsoft does. 
|
|
|
|
|
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: have that variable C as temp variable
Or XOR swap them.
|
|
|
|
|
A slot is a location where you can deploy your application to meet different needs in the application lifecycle. For example a development slot, QA slot, Production slot etc. You deploy to the different slots as you move your code through the lifecycle.
To my knowledge, deploying to a slot only updates the contents of the target slot and doesn't have any affect on the source slot i.e. it is unaffected by the deployment.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Swappin in most cases means:
1. A => C
2. B => A
3. C => B
A primer bug is: simple A => B overwrites B 
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Someone at microsoft had it's brain swapped with that of a monkey. It was the monkey who got the short end of the stick.
DURA LEX, SED LEX
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
How can MS take their own Edge browser seriously when it forces you to use two hands to open a link in a new tab and switch to it (i.e., you must Ctrl-Shift while clicking on the link)? Even IE had a better approach!
If you want a laugh, click on the 'All 8 Replies' link on this page: microsoft edge open new tab in foreground - Microsoft Community
Anyway, for anyone who plays with other browsers every once in a while, the new version of Vivaldi finally has tearable tabs. Not as good as Google's implementation, but good enough for use. That was the only thing keeping me away from it. Added to tab stacks, Vivaldi is finally becoming a little more powerful. (It also has a 'Right-click, down' mouse gesture that opens links in a new tab and goes right to it.)
|
|
|
|
|
I did like that they released edge with lots of deficiencies compared to IE. I have a bunch of issues
1) I liked having the favorites in a folder so that I could copy then, and reorganize them in the browser, Edge removed that.
2) No longer can prevent web addresses from opening, and not even availability to a lot of other preferences. I will have to say trying to find what you wanted in the IE preferences could be a challenge.
And of course seems to be some incompatibilities
|
|
|
|
|
Incompatibilities is an understatement. I compiled my bookmarks into a very simple HTML page that I have used as my home page for the last twenty years and it has worked with every browser I have ever tried it on with the exception of edge. You can be assured that I refuse to use edge if it can't even load such primitive HTML as that page has. It doesn't even have any javascript or any other type of scripting in it. I think that is entirely ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
If you were around in the IE4 days, you'd know that a bunch of guys created a shell for IE4+ that gave you more than just the things you're moaning about, which made all the difference in the world.
Because IE later turned to utter garbage, they decided to launch their own browser.
I'll let you google it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: it forces you to use two hands to open a link in a new tab and switch to it
Found another one, busy "surfing with one hand".
|
|
|
|
|
I take it you are also a member of the club! Need one hand for ![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) !!!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think he's in that club.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
The Curse of Oak Island[^]
Just coming up to the end of the fourth series, and they still haven't found a damned thing worth more than fourpence.
It really is like watching a train wreck, where every tiny bit of ridiculous speculative BS is treated as absolute truth -- until it's completely disproven, by the end of the show.
But then there's more ridiculous speculative BS for the next episode, of course.
We've had multiple Ark of the Covenant theories, multiple pirate treasure theories, and even theories about original Shakespeare manuscripts. I don't think I've ever heard the phrase "Could it be...?" used so many times.
They're either all really great actors, or they all really believe that there's treasure buried there -- as if they hadn't found the real pirate treasure by airing four seasons of a TV show!
Fun to watch though? Hell, yeah!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Spoiler alert!!! I love this rubbish as I recall reading the same Reader's Digest article as the taller brother only I didn't become obsessed with it. 
|
|
|
|
|
Damn!
You could be there now, watching mud being dug up, and reaping a fortune from TV rights!
I just can't stop watching it, though, even though I know they're digging for nothing more than audience ratings.
But I have to be honest: even though I know it's rubbish, it's still a more fun show than 90% of TV shows, lately.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: But I have to be honest: even though I know it's rubbish, it's still a more fun show than 90% of TV shows, lately.
Couldn't agree more - it's a hoot.
|
|
|
|
|
Stop watching reality shows. Many are fake just so there is something to maybe catch your interest. And how do you expect something to reflect reality when they are always aiming cameras at the cast. Of course they will act different. The History Channel has been absolutely ruined by reality shows.
Of course maybe you would be happier if they found some fake treasure. What crap these shows are.
|
|
|
|
|
Um, this isn't just w@nkers. It's people who are convinced that something ridiculous is true, and are using TV to pay for it.
"Reality TV" is far removed from anything I watch*.
* Except Firefly, of course, because we all tnow that that is real.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Most History channel programming is crap; but good entertaining crap and has nothing to do with History.
I wished there was a real history channel.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, TV is all about money, not content.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
