|
lw@zi wrote: You can try to enroll
Why? I am neither a princess, nor do I require protection.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
My ignorance protects me from what I suppose would be a lethal mind attack.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Google "IBM JCL". Any further description (or link to such) would be more appropriate to the Soapbox.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I already did, my ignorance lies in the lack of direct experience with that... I can understand it's hellish but I don't have the pain receptors reflexively triggered
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I taught IBM JCL for 2 years. After a while, I actually got to understand why they did things the way they did, and realized that present day classes and configurations are no better.
BTW, IBM mainframes did not get hacked.
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Patin wrote: IBM mainframes did not get hacked.
Given that TCP/IP was only designed in 1974, that the Internet ("World Wide Web") only took off in the early 1990's, and that very few people can afford to read their mail or surf the 'net on a mainframe, that's not really surprising.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought that someone would come up with this, but the fact is that IBM mainframes had security built in that would make most current hacks impossible. I've recently read that some of those security features are now being considered for microprocessors. Sorry, I don't have the details in ready memory right now, but I had to both attend and lecture courses in which those hardware minutia were described in detail.
|
|
|
|
|
I stand corrected.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll just leave this here:
PXSelectBase<Account> query = new PXSelectJoinGroupBy<Account,
LeftJoin<SalesOrder, On<SalesOrder.customerAccountID, Equal<Account.accountID>>,
LeftJoin<OrderDetail, On<SalesOrder.orderNbr, Equal<OrderDetail.orderNbr>>,
LeftJoin<Product, On<Product.productID, Equal<OrderDetail.productID>>>>>,
Where<Account.companyType, Equal<CompanyTypes.customer>>,
Aggregate<GroupBy<Account.accountID, GroupBy<Product.categoryCD, Sum<OrderDetail.extPrice>>>>>(this);
A query using a custom ORM from a CRM product we were evaluating last year. It makes LINQ look positively beautiful by comparison.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Where's my mind bleach?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a new appreciation for Expression Trees.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
New Rule... If your cool new "one liner" is more reminiscent of a perl trick... STOP!
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.
Corba?
I don't know, I was made to sit down and read a book on it 20+ years ago. I still think this could've ended my developer career early on.
|
|
|
|
|
Bloatus macro script - the original which was the same as the spreadsheet.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I can understand. There is not enough online help either on that front.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
lw@zi wrote: There is not enough online help either on that front.
A good bartender can help though...
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Some beautiful AutoLisp, enjoy
(defun traverse1 (tree queue depth)
(cond ((= depth (length queue)) ;only dive into depth
(list (car tree)))
(T (append (traverse1 (caadr tree) ;simplified for binary trees
(append queue (list (car tree)))
depth)
(traverse1 (cadadr tree)
(append queue (list (car tree)))
depth)))))
|
|
|
|
|
devenv.exe wrote: Is this even a syntax??
Everything is a syntax for anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
Translated that to English for ya!
Everything is a syntax to someone.
|
|
|
|
|
There happens to be an article about that here on CodeProject [^] - I used that some years ago when I had the pleasure to use MDX queries
|
|
|
|
|
After all, what could go wrong on a site where everyone likes each other, and the company is so respectful of your privacy ? [^]
«... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12
modified 24-May-18 9:45am.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: After all, what could go wrong on a site where everyone likes each other, and the company is so respectful of your privacy
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy Falcon.
|
|
|
|
|
You may want to check that link
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Eddy, link fixed.
«... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12
|
|
|
|