|
...and I am not a terrorist.
This movie[^] chokes me for some reason. I have seen it about 10 times and I can watch it again.
It is story of a Muslim guy with Aspergers/Autism whose Hindu wife told him to come back only after he tells the USA president that his name is Khan and he is not a terrorist. This is placed around 9/11 mishap. She said so since her kid was killed just because he was a Muslim. IMHO, this is best thing Sharukh Khan has done in past 15 years of his acting career.
Love it. Back to movie folks. ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Only because Shah Rukh Khan supported muslims, you appreciated, when he became a hindu soldier and fought against Pakistan in Main Hoon Na you hated him?
Look, these movie guys are not real! They're called "actors", the one who acts. You shouldn't just try to like or dislike them for who they are in the movies, but try to appreciate their work in real life.
I - to an extend - am a fan of SRK, but My name is Khan is not the only movie that was great, in bollywood 3 idiots is also a great movie (whose background is the 3 extraordinary students, who were put in wrong field, they loved something else, but their parents wanted them to become an engineer and they were never able to become an engineer, so they made their parents realize their problem; Amir Khan was the main guy behind all this). Being a muslim in any way, does not mean that I am a terrorist!
I am a muslim, and I have firm belief in Love for all, Hatred for none, and that terrorism, is never tolerated by Islam or any muslim, in any form.
+1 for the topic however.
Favourite line: Throw me to them wolves and close the gate up. I am afraid of what will happen to them wolves - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Huh? You do realise I can understand what a movie is. I like that movie and work of one actor. Period.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but that description wasn't for you. We're in the Lounge so there are other people around too. I don't want to seem like a Martian to them while naming movies around.
Favourite line: Throw me to them wolves and close the gate up. I am afraid of what will happen to them wolves - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I can bet most people around here know what a movie is.
|
|
|
|
|
Does OriginalGriff knows that? -_- Just people here from Sub-continent like you and me from India or Pakistan know it, or the people who have a background of Sub-continent know about that movie. We're not talking about Oscar winning "Slumdog Millionare" that might be well-known among people.
Favourite line: Throw me to them wolves and close the gate up. I am afraid of what will happen to them wolves - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
What are you up to? It is a simple post. I like one movie and that is it.
|
|
|
|
|
Listen brother, I have no beef with you and this is a public platform, you post what you like but you must then listen to what others have. I like My name is khan, but not to the level of awesomeness. I didn't mean to piss you, but, it seems that is whats going on around here, next time try to post stuff that you can handle the criticism and opinions for.
Over and out! Peace.
Favourite line: Throw me to them wolves and close the gate up. I am afraid of what will happen to them wolves - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I understand what this place is, brother. Just say I do not like the movie. Period. Is this your "I will be a troll" weekend?
|
|
|
|
|
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: Look, these movie guys are not real! They're called "actors", the one who acts. You shouldn't just try to like or dislike them for who they are in the movies, but try to appreciate their work in real life.
I take the opposite view (that you should completely ignore who the actor is, and only think of the performance/character), because every actor I've met (not a low number) has been at least a complete disappointment, and at worst a complete [something non-kid-sister-friendly].
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I was just trying to explain this fact to our Indian fellow here! Who never try to take and understand things logically, and try to get as much beef as they can.
I was just saying, movie was OK, but trying to start chanting "Shah Rukh, Shah Rukh" isn't a good way! He is not the same in real life.
But, oh well, its his point of view, what can I say. 
Favourite line: Throw me to them wolves and close the gate up. I am afraid of what will happen to them wolves - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I think I saw that guy in DC for the demonstration "Muslims for Peace" rally.
SNORK[^].
|
|
|
|
|
LOL. Did you? For real? He is an OK actor as far as Indian film industry is concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - great movie.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
You mistake me for someone who would foolishly put themselves in a position of being out of reds.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Very nice movie and one of the finest actors of India Sharukh Khan...
|
|
|
|
|
The bank where i work is having a re-org, and I need to choose a title for myself 
My current title is "Senior IT support", where i get to handle tickets, either directly by development or by assigning tickets to vendors.
My new responsibilities are the following:
1. Working exclusively on ongoing projects, no support. (Yay!  )
2. No internal development, all projects assigned to vendors, closed box with no source code. (Boo  )
3. Handling all technical aspects of new and ongoing projects (technical review, deployment, testing, giving feedback to PMs, etc.)
The following titles are initially rejected during brainstorming with my team members:
1. Software Developer (no development going on!)
2. IT Consultant (rejected since we are the on the client side (Que unfunny puns))
3. The Man (i thought it was good)
4. IT Specialist (too broad)
5. IT Architect (invalid since the vendor will usually architect the system, we only review)
6. IT Analyst (implies you are doing analysis most of the time, while most of our work will be review, implementation and testing.
So what do you call a software developer, that doesn't do any development, is involved in the technical aspect of projects and is on the receiving end of projects ?
Amr Abdel Majeed
Senior Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to me like it has an abstract keyword appended to it. You're not having any thing to do, but still you're the base for doing everything. Wow!
Favourite line: Throw me to them wolves and close the gate up. I am afraid of what will happen to them wolves - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
How about "The idiot who claims to know everything but is always busy for work."? 
I want that as my title, FFS.
|
|
|
|
|
Overseer lord of IT?
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.0 Beta
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
Not my circus not my monkey's!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everything sounds better with the word 'President' in it! But your colleagues will probably shoot down 'President (or Vice President) of Information Management Systems.' 
|
|
|
|
|
Amr Abdel Majeed wrote: No internal development, all projects assigned to vendors, closed box with no source code. (Boo )
I work for a bank who did EXACTLY what yours is doing in the 90s, The absolutely WORST decision they have made in IT. Look for another employer, you will not be happy overseeing vendors unless you have a bent for it (management bleh).
A bank, or any large organisation needs internal developers, they MUST retain the IP to the system they are reliant on, not necessarily the big, core systems but the small gluey ones that make them unique, reporting and analysis mostly. These must be handled internally.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Amr Abdel Majeed wrote: what do you call a software developer, that doesn't do any development,
redundant
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
