|
Not to worry. As long as you don't forget that you have a wife that you've already paid for, your double spending will be epsilon by comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for posting that! It made me go and check my license, and it is the same as yours. A couple of weeks ago I had installed the free version on my entertainment laptop - a 19" screen multi-media thingy, my previous main machine - as I have started to digitize some of my vinyl collection and so needed to do proper backups, and also wanted a clone of C: in case a planned upgrade to Win 10 went pear-shaped. Now I shall install it on that machine as well.
I used to just use that machine just for streaming video to a TV so left it on a Win 7 Home Premium clean install, but when it became more central to my music listening I decided to check out upgrading to Win 10. When this was my main machine I had used MSDN to upgrade to 7 Pro, so when MS ran the Win 10 free upgrade program I got Win 10 Pro. When I replaced the laptop with a new machine, I just did a clean install of Win 7 Home from the original CDs, and left it at that. When I went to see if I could still get a free upgrade to Win 10 Home two weeks ago, not only did I get that - I also got 10 Pro back again, not by choice, but by default!
I was going to post here about it, but decided to keep a low profile in case it should suddenly revert, but it hasn't so far, so I thought I would just tack the story onto the end of this reply. I first got the tip from the 'How to geek' website. Obviously MS kept the data relating to my original upgrade, and tied it back to this machine.
|
|
|
|
|
Other than my steam library and visual studio (also windows if you count it when it ships with a PC) I don't really pay for software. The software I do pay for is usually big ticket ($500 USD or thereabouts) like Visual Studio so I'm not likely to forget.
But I just don't find the need to purchase a lot of little software things. Most of what I need to do can be done with free software or a little bit of code or even a script. The last thing that wasn't a game, and wasn't visual studio or windows, that i purchased was a $10 MP4/TMDB tagging tool i can't remember the name of though - because i don't use it anymore and it has been years.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
... Everybody makes mistakes[^] ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't get it. You have ordered some stuff that is in the containers?
|
|
|
|
|
... A Venn diagram[^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The canal is the root of the problem!
|
|
|
|
|
You've got a nerve!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Here's one. What others don't you remember hearing? (A trick question for a Saturday night.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be about "Love bubbles", in the states the song might be different:
Quote: What do you get when you fall in love?
A guy with a pin to burst your bubble
That's what you get for all your trouble
I'll never fall in love again
I'll never fall in love again
|
|
|
|
|
|
I remember hearing it. Very beautiful song!
|
|
|
|
|
That's a trick question alright.
Here's another one: a song you remember hearing but haven't heard.
|
|
|
|
|
I give up - any clues?
|
|
|
|
|
I actually had something in mind but didn't think anyone would be interested in it as a riddle.
A hint is that an American wrote it in 1952.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, song might be misleading, though it could be argued the term is as appropriate as any.
It ain't on that page.
|
|
|
|
|
I never did tell you what song I was thinking of when I made that comment. Then again, you didn't ask. But now I'm reminded to, because OG mentioned it in a post [^] today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
PS - if he had made it 13 seconds shorter, potheads could have sat around musing about the deep philosophical meanings in the song, without realizing the greater emptiness the song represents in their philosophy.
|
|
|
|
|
For me it must be the theme from "Dr. Kildare"[^]
I was born in 1970 and there has always been this tune in my mind that I have never been able to place. I must have heard this on the tv when I was a baby.
I recently heard a snippet of the tune and busily googled to discover where it originated.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
What I mean by a "WIFI-enabled controller board" is some type of board (e.g., an Arduino) with WIFI access. I have hunch this falls into the rubrik of "Internet of Things".
Specifically, I am looking at getting this board to control my traffic light:
EMR WIFI.pdf - Google Drive[^]
It's sold here:
Amazon.com: ElectronicNuts Wi-Fi 3 Channel Traffic Light Signal Controller/Sequencer/System AC Voltage Range 110V-220VAC 50-60Hz Works for DC Voltages up to 100V DC Controllable by WiFi / ESP8266 (EMR for AC/DC): Computers & Accessories[^]
It appears that the way this works is that the board itself has a hard-coded IP address and its own WIFI modem, and just as I would connect to my hotspot WIFI modem to get into the World Wide Web, I would connect to this board's WIFI modem. I would then point my browser to that hard-coded IP address, which would return the hard-coded webpage where I would need to enter in the log-in credentials to login into the board's WIFI, after which I would get another hard-coded webpage for me to do stuff to change the state of the board, as the button-click function would send a packet or information on what I want to change on the board. It seems like I don't even have to be logged into to my regular internet WIFI modem to access the board's WIFI.
Is my understanding of this system accurate?
modified 27-Mar-21 1:31am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say @code-witch would be able to give you a quick rundown on such beasties.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|