|
Thanks, I was looking for something to read!
|
|
|
|
|
Specs add sonic rush like clockwork. (11)
I may be a little slow responding to answers, heading into a Zoom meeting...
[clue] Pair of specs. I would have said "pair" in place of "specs" originally but I didn't want to exclude the cricket-challenged. [/clue]
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
modified 26-Aug-21 6:17am.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you're safe with this one Peter - I have no idea.
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
now with clue...
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
isochronous
Specs = oo (also a pair in cricket is two scores of 0 by the same player, same game)
Anagram of sonic rush + oo
|
|
|
|
|
Yes! YAUT
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
modified 26-Aug-21 7:17am.
|
|
|
|
|
... what would it be?
I'm struggling, between "opinionated" and "challenging". And, BTW, the 'rules', (that I'm just making up, right now!), state that you can't have catch-all, generic words. Otherwise, I could have just gone with "annoying".
Note. I'm not planning on dying any time soon - but I know, from bitter experience, that you never can predict what life will throw at you. Every morning, when I wake up, I say to myself: "result".
|
|
|
|
|
In that case, whatever the opposite of "result" is....
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Peter_in_2780 wrote: In that case, whatever the opposite of "result" is.... "postponed"?
|
|
|
|
|
Management
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
LEAVE
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
By your rules, probably "Oops" or "Honorificabilitudinitatibus". I've long said what I actually want is "Sh** Happens"
|
|
|
|
|
Either AFK or BRB.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if acronyms is cheating, (and I made up the rules!), but I like these.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, German with its composite wordss would also be cheating then
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Spike Milligan claimed one I would have liked
Told you I was ill
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking along the same lines, either
Uploading ...
or
Downloading ...
Depending on where you think you'll end up.
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As we can't have Try .. Catch according to your rules, it must be Finally
|
|
|
|
|
I have liked the "AFK" proposed above...
Some people I know would probably suggest "ENDLY" though
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
42
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
Could you do us the favour of explaining why "annoying" is "generic", but "challenging" isn't? Struggling with the rules here but regardless, I do like "Finally" as proposed elsewhere. Accessible both to developers and the general public.
|
|
|
|
|
DerekT-P wrote: Could you do us the favour of explaining why "annoying" is "generic", but "challenging" isn't? Yeah, it's a bit of a grey area, admittedly - but I'll give it a go:
- Someone can be "annoying" for any number of reasons - including being "opinionated" or "challenging".
- [I think], "challenging" describes a more specific type of characteristic - maybe!
To be honest, the fact that I consider the word "challenging" as an option for my gravestone, probably gives you the only clue you need to my approach to rules. Particularly when they've been made up, on the spot, by some lunatic posting random stuff on The Lounge!
|
|
|
|
|