|
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like everyone's asleep so I'll take it
Burrito
Spanish ass = Burro
around it
"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Dat's de bunny!
You are up tomorrow.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Burro. I always confuse that with the word for digging…
That’s right - I can’t tell my ass from a hole in the ground!!!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just play Elite Dangerous and you will get proven technology if you buy a crate, I mean Krait Mk. II:
Krait: MY COFFEE MAKER! : EliteDangerous[^]
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
When we bought the F16 fighter planes around 1980, people questioned the cost. E.g. the cockpit had a coffee maker costing around NOK 4000 - that would be more than NOK 16,000 today, or almost USD 2000.
The explanation given was that the coffee maker had to be usable even when the F16 made a dive, i.e. in a weightless environment. I guess the pilots really need a cup of coffee to relax by when they are in a dive.
So we have had the technology available for 40+ years. Maybe production has been optimized so that the cost is even less than USD 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
Use a espresso machine: they are steam powered so should work in zero g, with a few important modifications ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Nah! Use an ordinary machine - just whirl it around your head while it's brewing.
|
|
|
|
|
You are going to have to do that really, really carefully: if you don't spin it to get exactly one g, then it'll be too weak, and if you get too many g's you'll not get time to develop the flavours as it filters through the grounds.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That happened to a friend of mine once... Or at least, so he claims!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference. Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: develop the flavours as it filters through the grounds
Grounds control to Major Tom?
|
|
|
|
|
:GROAN:
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
At least I didn't write ...
Customer: Waiter - this coffee tastes like mud.
Waiter: That's not surprising, sir. It was only ground this morning.
|
|
|
|
|
You have an earthy sense of humor...
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I've been hunting for an algorithm for computing FOLLOWS(k) sets for LL(k) grammars. It's a parsing thing.
The only thing google is returning me on it is a dead link referred to on a newsgroup. I try to use google to get to a cached copy of the link but google is taking me back to the newsgroup page that links to the link I want.
I found another reference to it on like stack overflow or something, and they referred me to Dick Grune's book which I already have, and doesn't cover it very well if at all (my memory is hazy but if it was in there I would have known, as I am the mad captain and LL(k) is my white whale)
I think I might have to figure it out myself, and that worries me. To say it's non-trivial is a bit of an understatement. There are several ways to do it, and most require permutation and exponential growth of parse tables.
I don't know how to properly permutate follows sets. It's confusing.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: FOLLOWS(k) sets
Do you mean "first and follow sets"?
|
|
|
|
|
FOLLOWS(k) sets particularly for where k>1
FOLLOWS(k=1) I can do, but there's a monumental difference in implementing k=1 and k>1, unfortunately.
k is a convention used to indicate the number of lookahead symbols.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm,
Found a paper from Oxford that describes how to construct first and follow sets for arbitrary k. He gives an example for LL(5).
The LL(f inite) strategy for optimal LL(k) parsing[^] by Peter Belcak
I can comprehend alot of very complicated things, but this paper is very hard to understand.
|
|
|
|
|
I was hoping for something with less math, but thanks.
I never went to uni, so my exposure to math formalisms is limited
Edit: Actually, that paper is very good. I don't understand all of it yet, but the author seems to be explaining the formalisms used so that I can potentially understand them. Thanks for the link!
Real programmers use butterflies
modified 14-Nov-21 17:52pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome.
For what it's worth... I e-mail postdoc and researchers all the time. I've e-mailed two universities this weekend asking to obtain their text corpus for my NLP project.
It doesn't hurt to e-mail the guy and ask if he has an implementation you can take a look at. Also... if you look in the bibliography at the bottom of the paper some of those links go to other parser projects.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
You might try the Computer Science library of your local University. The librarian is likely to be able to refer you to appropriate books.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, and a lot of those assume a background in mathematics that I lack. I've gotten only so far with things like the dragon book.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Well,
I am not even kidding, the codeproject Lounge is probably the worse place to get help on science/technical issues. The lounge lizards will poke fun at anything they don't understand, gripe about everything under the sun and give you a list of every pseudo-celebrity that died this week.
You already know the C/C++ and C# languages (probably more) and I think you are selling yourself short if you think that you will be unable to understand logic notation[^]. Most of what is in that paper falls under tautology[^].
It might take a while but it's really just another language to learn.
If all these teenagers on Reddit can read/write formal logic[^] then I am sure you can too.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
I do not think the Codewitch was exactly asking for help. Just describing a technical situation, as they have done before...
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|