|
#Worldle #229 4/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜➡️
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜➡️
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜↙️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
I dare you!
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #229 2/6 (100%)
🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜➡️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
|
|
|
|
|
Dare accepted ...
#Worldle #229 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 5/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟩⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨⬜⬜⬜🟩
⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩
🟨🟩⬜🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛
⬛🟨🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟨🟩⬛⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 X/6
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜
🟨🟩⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
Never heard this word.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6* 🔥2
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
wordle.at
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
MessageBox.Show(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature)
? $"This is my signature:{Environment.NewLine}{_signature}": "404-Signature not found");
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨
⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜
🟨🟩⬜🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 3/6*
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 3/6
🟨⬛🟨🟨🟩
🟨🟩🟩🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I could have done it in 2, damn anagram.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 5/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 6/6*
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨
🟨⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩⬜🟨🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 X/6
I had 3 right in every row, yet no cigar! Very frustrating!
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 5/6*
⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟩🟨🟨
🟨🟩🟩🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, I get it. And that process isn't limited to C#.
|
|
|
|
|
C++ joined the chat
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: ... recent addings to the language ...
I'm not convinced by your definition of "recent"!
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: Named/optional arguments Added in C# 4, which was released in April 2010.
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: ??
?[] The null conditional / coalescing operators were added in C# 6 (July 2015).
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: discards
C# 7 (March 2017)
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: ()
Not entirely sure what you're referring to here. I'm going to guess that you mean value tuples, which were also added in C# 7 (March 2017).
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: Switch expressions
C# 8 (September 2019).
As with any addition to the language, nobody is forcing you to use them. If you want to stick to writing C# 1.0 code, then you're free to do so. It's only when you come to read someone else's code that you might need to understand the newer constructs - but even then, there are ways to convert the code to an older syntax.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 7-Sep-22 3:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
I tend to agree with you on this one.
C# has always been innovating, for the sake of trying new things or simply taking a swing to solve minor issues.
I have no problem with Microsoft doing this. Most additions end up never being used in production anyway.
As far as I can tell, they typically serve a very niche purpose and audience, and only rarely catch on.
|
|
|
|