|
Dare accepted ...
#Worldle #229 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 5/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟩⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨⬜⬜⬜🟩
⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩
🟨🟩⬜🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛
⬛🟨🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟨🟩⬛⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 X/6
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜
🟨🟩⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
Never heard this word.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6* 🔥2
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
wordle.at
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
MessageBox.Show(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature)
? $"This is my signature:{Environment.NewLine}{_signature}": "404-Signature not found");
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨
⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜
🟨🟩⬜🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 3/6*
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 3/6
🟨⬛🟨🟨🟩
🟨🟩🟩🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I could have done it in 2, damn anagram.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 5/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 6/6*
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨
🟨⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 4/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩⬜🟨🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 X/6
I had 3 right in every row, yet no cigar! Very frustrating!
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 445 5/6*
⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟩🟨🟨
🟨🟩🟩🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, I get it. And that process isn't limited to C#.
|
|
|
|
|
C++ joined the chat
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: ... recent addings to the language ...
I'm not convinced by your definition of "recent"!
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: Named/optional arguments Added in C# 4, which was released in April 2010.
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: ??
?[] The null conditional / coalescing operators were added in C# 6 (July 2015).
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: discards
C# 7 (March 2017)
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: ()
Not entirely sure what you're referring to here. I'm going to guess that you mean value tuples, which were also added in C# 7 (March 2017).
Behzad Sedighzadeh wrote: Switch expressions
C# 8 (September 2019).
As with any addition to the language, nobody is forcing you to use them. If you want to stick to writing C# 1.0 code, then you're free to do so. It's only when you come to read someone else's code that you might need to understand the newer constructs - but even then, there are ways to convert the code to an older syntax.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 7-Sep-22 3:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
I tend to agree with you on this one.
C# has always been innovating, for the sake of trying new things or simply taking a swing to solve minor issues.
I have no problem with Microsoft doing this. Most additions end up never being used in production anyway.
As far as I can tell, they typically serve a very niche purpose and audience, and only rarely catch on.
|
|
|
|
|
I think OP is only starting to see these in code bases.
Not everyone is on latest/greatest day 1 adoption takes time.
I have to also say something about "nobody forcing" is - try to write C# 1.0 code and get it past code review
In the end everyone will have to just put up with it - if they like these features or not.
|
|
|
|
|
No one is forcing you to use those new features unless you're working on a codebase that uses those new features.
Things like
public readonly double Distance => Math.Sqrt(X * X + Y * Y);
are, for me, a matter of taste. Things like
public static bool IsLetterOrSeparator(this char c) =>
c is (>= 'a' and <= 'z') or (>= 'A' and <= 'Z') or '.' or ',';
give me stomach acid. A dev has saved a few keystrokes at the expense of structure.
This
static Quadrant GetQuadrant(Point point) => point switch
{
(0, 0) => Quadrant.Origin,
var (x, y) when x > 0 && y > 0 => Quadrant.One,
var (x, y) when x < 0 && y > 0 => Quadrant.Two,
var (x, y) when x < 0 && y < 0 => Quadrant.Three,
var (x, y) when x > 0 && y < 0 => Quadrant.Four,
var (_, _) => Quadrant.OnBorder,
_ => Quadrant.Unknown
};
is meant to provide neat, compact code but I worry that for someone new to C# it becomes a stumbling block.
My feeling is that it should be easy to switch between languages. Truly I wish there were only one language, but us humans are tribal and so that will never happen (and of course situations where a language needs to have specifics for the platform, hardware, compiler or programming methodology).
Even so, making a language simpler is better, and adding syntactic sugar for the sake of it simply diverges the language.
In many instances adding new features can converge languages. Javascript gaining the coalesce operator, C# getting the null-check. This is All Good. But like good art, they should add what they need and no more.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|