|
Yeah, I know. Let me put a disclaimer on that.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
Matt T Heffron wrote: That has a totally different meaning in some variations of English!!! But it's legal now in most US states.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: But it's legal now in most US states.
Don't bring it up in the lounge, because I'm totally tempted to offer my opinion on the matter.
|
|
|
|
|
Such as how dare others interfere in the private lives of others and dictate who they can love?
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, seems completely obvious to me, but in the country I live in, it's a politically charged issue. On the other hand as someone that has studied physics in depth, human production of CO2 and global warming is just as much of a no-brainer, so better take that to the soapbox as well.
|
|
|
|
|
I am with you there.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: dictate who they can love? That would be a terrible place to live if someone could dictate who you love.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get your use of the 'roll eyes' icon, do you use it to mean you are being sarcastic, or I am being dumb? Or arr you using it to be funny?
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: I don't get your use of the 'roll eyes' icon, do you use it to mean you are being sarcastic, or I am being dumb? Sure you don't.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
No, really I don't.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, that's as far as I was going.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: I have kept my 48 inch chest!
You avoided "Furniture disease"... That's where your chest falls into your drawers.
A positive attitude may not solve every problem, but it will annoy enough people to be worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
Matt T Heffron wrote: "Furniture disease"... That's where your chest falls into your drawers
Only applies to women, I hope!
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
No, I'v had a few surgeries and things drop much faster then you would imagine, as well as getting winded walking up stairs.
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to hear it. More devs should take their health seriously. The body is just not designed to sit down so long like we do. Two things typically happen over the years, the hamstrings become inflexible and too tight which throws the pelvis out of alignment and causes lower back pain, and the spine isn't in its natural curve while sitting and that causes all kinds of discomfort in the body long term.
Exercise is the only way to combat this. No drug or pill or anything science has to say will change this as long as we have the bodies we do, or wait 5,000 years to evolve into sitting species. Personally, I'm just gonna exercise.
When you do exercise, make sure to toss some good hamstring stretches in your routines. Your back and the ladies will thank you for it.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jeremy, haven't heard from you for ages. You left in disgust a while back, don't blame you, the Lounge gets like that, anyway, welcome back.
I agree, being fit actually improves my coding, I can focus better and am less distracted.
Vis hamstring, I never had problems with flexibility there, I can lean forward a lot and keep my feet flat on the ground but good advice anyway.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: Hi Jeremy, haven't heard from you for ages. You left in disgust a while back, don't blame you, the Lounge gets like that, anyway, welcome back.
Wow you have a fantastic memory, even I forgot that. I'm way less dramatic these days since I've accepted the things I can't change you know. And thanks!
Munchies_Matt wrote: I agree, being fit actually improves my coding, I can focus better and am less distracted.
Exactly. Same goes with getting off of caffeine. A good night's rest does more to improve my coding than any cup of coffee ever will.
Munchies_Matt wrote: Vis hamstring, I never had problems with flexibility there, I can lean forward a lot and keep my feet flat on the ground but good advice anyway.
It's probably because you're active then, so even if you're new to lifting it's not like you're starting from scratch ya know.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: When you do exercise, make sure to toss some good hamstring stretches in your routines. Your back and the ladies will thank you for it.
Words to live by, stretches are only the start, real strength is even better.
|
|
|
|
|
This morning in The Insider was an article about a Google Quantum Computer project[^]. I've seen articles and blogs about them quite a lot recently.
I am both very curious and very afraid for these computers...
I'm not very good at math and I pretty much hate it to a point where I cannot function properly when math is involved.
But I understand 0's and 1's (mostly, anyway), so I got that going for me, which is nice.
What I do not understand are superpositions and complex numbers. And since counting to 1 is probably the most I'll ever achieve in terms of math I was wondering how fast these quantum computers will conquer the world.
Should I find a new job? Or could I support legacy systems using 0's and 1's until I'm at my retirement age (still about 41 years to go)? Or do you think quantum computers will rule the world, but the math behind it will be mostly abstracted away for application developing programmers?
At least I'll know what to tell my customers[^]
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I’m looking forward to the next generation computer after the one you mentioned when they discover a computer that operates on the base 4 numbering system utilizing the molecules adenine, thymine, guanine, cytosine to produce a variety of computational structures capable of 1,000 terabytes or more. That’ll be awesome. It's being developed even now.
|
|
|
|
|
Does that mean I'll have to count to four?
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Does that mean I'll have to count to four? Don't worry. You can borrow someone's fingers if you run out.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
At least I get your signature (but only because I have 1010 fingers)
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I want a base 10 computer...it's about time these machines adapt to us!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure that practical quantum computers will be just as transparent as the current lot; ie, if you can function without math now, you'll be fine in the future. After all, there's no evidence to suggest that people are getting smarter, and no one with a lick of business savvy will make a product for people who aren't likely to exist.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|