|
True, but I'm looking at the content they're listing. Is that a decent learning approach?
Or, what other path can I take to get started with web dev in ASP.Net Core?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
If it sounds too good to be true (which it does to me) then it probably is. I would be tempted rather to spend time looking at CodeProject articles on the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thanks
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
For me the best way to learn ASP.NET Core is Adam Freeman's definitive book, Pro ASP.NET Core 6: Develop Cloud-Ready Web Applications Using MVC, Blazor, and Razor Pages[^]
It's the 9th ed so it has been through a lot.
He is a master author and touches on the most important points and the book is a breeze to read.
Also, the book is up to date and covers .NET Core 6.
It has tutorial to work you thru and see real examples.
It's also probably quite a bit cheaper. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Well it has EU in the name (TutorialsEU), so it must be ok.
(and I wont bother anyone with a silly link to Slant like: "What are the best resources to learn .NET?")
|
|
|
|
|
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
I would highly recommend this book for an entry point to .net core: "Murach ASP.NET Core MVC". Well structured, with working examples and a shallow learning curve approach. It's not written from some questionably experienced "professor" for his poor students. More like from programmers-to-programmers book.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Is the book about ASP.Net Core, or ASP.Net MVC?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
For the most part - Core, but the two are quite interconnected. Also, some basic Entity Framework topics.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. He's got a 2nd Edition coming on 12/2. I'll lwait till then
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
For my experience I know that some employers require the copies of certificate in order to give a position in project.
I've attended some course many years ago, however, they weren't online - so be aware, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
I have no doubts that one can learn something from this course and that Jannick is a great tutor but I wouldn't personally sign up for this course because of data transparency which I consider myself red flags.
1. If I am right, it doesn't say which version of ASP.NET Core (big red flag for me). I don't like it if such courses are not transparent. It would be a waste of time if it is e.g. ASP.NET Core 3.1 because there might be similar great courses which target ASP.NET Core 5, 6 and there were lots of changes since 3.1
2. What Angular version, there is now version 14
3. C# Developer Salary chart without and with ASP.NET - Source and year? I checked https://www.salary.com/research/salary/posting/csharp-programmer-salary and it says $108,875 for C# Programmer
4. He says C# devs that can show in-depth knowledge in ASP.NET earn up to 67% more money - Source?
5. Language "This course is absolutely unique and not comparable to any other programming course out there." Really?
I personally use https://www.pluralsight.com/[^] which is subscription based. I check the newest courses they have and then sign up for 1-3 months and repeat in another time again. I think they might have 1 week free, if you would like to try it.
Other helpful links:
GitHub - MoienTajik/AspNetCore-Developer-Roadmap: Roadmap to becoming an ASP.NET Core developer in 2022[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Rats" and "sinking ships" spring to mind.
Is there going to be anything left? Why pay $44B to dismantle a company that isn't even a rival to what you do?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Why pay $44B to dismantle a company that isn't even a rival to what you do? To boldly go where no man has gone before?
You have to admit, it is one hell of a resume bullet point.
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: one hell of a resume bullet point. In the same class of bullet point as Thomas Midgley Jr's resume:Added lead to gasInvented chlorofluorocarbons
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
But if Musk succeeds, he has a small claim to being a hero (for once). I would gladly give him credit for sinking Twitter!
(But what he's done to his employees is deplorable, so hero-hat gets ground into the dirt.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been watching the Eli Lilly drama.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
If these are legitimate screen shots, this is proof that cyber-security analysts are right that Twitter is completely insecure, which of course makes it completely untrustworthy. I suspect when all the dust settles out Musk will provide a report to the SEC showing the bot count when including hijacked accounts is far more than the 5% reported by the previous Twitter management. If this is the case I hope the previous management all goes to jail for securities fraud and cyber crime (failure to protect their systems).
|
|
|
|
|
The previous management actually took steps to verify accounts like those screenshots. Musk eliminated those verifications and replaced them with $8 so people could 'self-verify.' Your case against the previous management has no merit in the context of those screenshots.
|
|
|
|
|
obermd wrote: I suspect when all the dust settles out Musk will provide a report to the SEC showing the bot count when including hijacked accounts is far more than the 5% reported by the previous Twitter management.
Not sure what exactly you think you are referring to but how exactly do you think he is going to prove that?
Bot detection is usually or perhaps entirely based on detecting usage patterns. After all it isn't like they are going to start going door to door to check on each user.
Certainly Elon Musk is not going to bring anything at all to the table in actually detecting them. Except of course screaming about it.
Twitter itself was already detecting them. Now there are 50% fewer employees to enhance that detection. And those employees are not focused on that but rather in raising revenue. Not to mention of course that if they do reduce bots then revenue will go down because advertises are paying for actual eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
Seen this word guessing game on TikTok and decided to give it a try. As with most of them these days it seems to be inspired by Wordle, so a few of you may be interested in giving it a go.
Contexto
Basically, you guess a word, and it will tell you how close that word is to the answer in terms of context/usage.
It seems to be a bit too "luck" based for my liking, so not something I imagine I will want to play very often, but kills a few minutes of boredom.
Anyway, here is my score for today, should be nice and easy for you all to beat (notice I used 1 tip too)...
I played contexto.me #53 and got it in 73 guesses and 1 tips.
🟩 6
🟨🟨🟨🟨 27
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 41
|
|
|
|
|
I played contexto.me #53 and got it in 31 guesses and 1 tips.
🟩🟩 12
🟨 7
🟥🟥 13
Way too luck based and long but heh, cool, thanks for sharing.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
My grief counselor died today.
He was so good that I don't even care.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|