|
RACIST!!!
(Well, if you'd said it the other way round, you'd have been called on it)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Now if you put it that way I will have to go gorge my eye out, since other parts of my body doing just fine. The eyes clearly the sinner!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Probably too much porn ....
|
|
|
|
|
For all we know, porn are usually have darker view or more pleasantly color tones. And for the record, I have clear vision for porn
|
|
|
|
|
|
How much rhythm does it take to knock "Shave and a haircut"?
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
OK - this is not a coding question but it does include some code.
Brace yourselves (pun intended) :-
/// <summary>
/// How dependencies are resolved
/// </summary>
[Flags]
public enum DependencyOrdinality
{
/// <summary>
/// This task can start even if its dependency has not yet started
/// </summary>
Optional = 0x0,
/// <summary>
/// This task can run if the dependency is running
/// </summary>
ConcurrentRun = 0x1,
/// <summary>
/// This task can run if the dependency has completed successfully
/// </summary>
PostSuccess = 0x2,
/// <summary>
/// This task can run if the dependency has completed in a failed state
/// </summary>
PostFail = 0x4
}
OK - so the word "Ordinality" is wrong. What should I call this?
|
|
|
|
|
I would use a descriptor that makes sense to you/other developers.
enumerator == ordinal, hence I would use a descriptor.
"Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's getter than Ordinality, so I think we have a result.
(I also thoughto of "Magnitude" and "Gate".. )
|
|
|
|
|
First off, since you're using flags, the naming convention, as per Microsoft is:
Use a singular name for most Enum types, but use a plural name for Enum types that are bit fields.
Thus, I would suggest:
TaskExecutionDependencyOptions
as it encapsulates the concept "This task can run...", so it becomes rather readable in, say:
TaskExecutionDependencyOptions.PostSuccess
Or, even the shorter:
TaskDependencyOptions
or
TaskOptions
would be quite reasonable, IMO.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Since you are using Flags, and you can have a "compound" result, I think I'd go for "DependencyState."
« There is only one difference between a madman and me. The madman thinks he is sane. I know I am mad. » Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
DEREK.
Tell everyone it's an acronym, and look at them if they're stupid for not knowing it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
My acronyms never have vowels in- if a thing is difficult to do it should be more difficult to pronounce.
|
|
|
|
|
Well... depending on the application, for me is logical to jump the number 3.
If you see it in binary you have
0x0 = 00000000
0x1 = 00000001
0x2 = 00000010
0x4 = 00000100
This is something I have seen many times to give variables a value that afterwards are used in different places with different meanings and different ways to work them out or to evaluate. I.e: Bit-Binary masking in the PLC to select procedure and colouring animations with the int-value in the HMI (I work in industrial automation)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is indeed mind-boggling to see these images. I recently came across the Ultra Deep Field[^] which is a tiny part of the sky, said to contain over 10000 galaxies. Within this field, the eXtreme Deep Field[^] is 13.2 billion light years away - just 450 million years after the Big Bang event.
Is this likely to jeopardize the Big Bang Theory? Is there a chance of finding something older than the Big Bang event itself?
|
|
|
|
|
Amarnath S wrote: Is there a chance of finding something older than the Big Bang event itself?
That would be interesting.
My understanding was that the observable universe is approximately 13 billion years because, at that distance, objects are receding from us at the speed of light so we just can't see them but there is no reason to think that there are not more objects that exist beyond that distance in every direction. I'm sure someone will correct me on that if necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
The Eye of God!
See?!??!!! Proof! (LOL)
BTW, awesome image. Thanks for the link!
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz wrote: Thanks for the link
Glad you like it: another convert to the astronomy side...
|
|
|
|
|
So where's the mote?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
At the Crazy Eddie Point. LOL.
Excellent books, those were.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz wrote: Excellent books, those were. Well, the first one was...
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Ah....the internet has been restored!
Now, how many emails have I got to deal with...?
Ah.
I may be some time...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|