|
I've started to get in to this. I watched the post season last year and have watched games from this years regular season most weeks.
Do you support a team? Struggling to decide who I like, thinking that if I do choose a team it might take some of the enjoyment out of it as now I just watch good games with no investment in the result. Don't think I have enough attachment to truly support a team anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure it'll come as no surprise to you that I support the Rams, LA as they were and St Louis as they are now.
I've been into the game since I was a kid when it was first on Channel 4, then when I went to university I played for 3 years so I know a lot of people who are in to the game too.
When you understand it I think it can be a fascinating game to watch, when you don't then it makes no sense at all.
From a playing perspective (and I have played most team sports to some degree or other over the years) it is by far the most physically and mentally demanding thing I have ever done.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
chriselst wrote: I'm sure it'll come as no surprise to you that I support the Rams,
Of Course didn't think of that.
chriselst wrote: LA as they were and St Louis as they are now.
Confirms what I was suspecting recently, that the teams are franchised and therefore can move City.
chriselst wrote: When you understand it
I'm getting there, I mean I understand most of it, though I still pick up one or two new vague rules each week which adds to the enjoyment. I agree it's fascinating. I'm often Stoned when I watch it and it's a good sport to just mong out too.
chriselst wrote: From a playing perspective (and I have played most team sports to some degree or other over the years) it is by far the most physically and mentally demanding thing I have ever done.
I remember you posting this awhile back in one of the endless Anglo-American Football debates that crop up here regularly, I often think about that when watching it and can see how right you were. There's no respite at all for the players on the pitch and if they let their player go for one moment, whether that be through Physical weakness or mental lapse, then they get punished.
|
|
|
|
|
I think one of the things that makes it unique amongst team sports is that there is no place for a rest at all when you are on the pitch. Each and every play all 11 on each side have something to do, a move to make, a block to make, a run to make, and if you do the wrong thing then the whole play breaks down.
When we played at uni (I was an offensive lineman) we had 30 second play clocks so when the whistle was blown for the end of the play you had 30 seconds to get back to your huddle, get the play from the QB which was in the form of a code, get the snap count from the QB, remember what you had to do for the play from a play book that ran to several pages, get to the line of scrimmage, get properly set, then wait for the signal to move. Move slightly early and you give away a penalty, move slightly too late and there is a very good chance that your man will be past you. Move into the right position, different for a pass to a run, or for a fake play, or move somewhere else if it is a stunt play, engage your man and then fight him until the whistle goes again. He is trying to get by you towards the man with the ball, you are either trying to stop him or trying to move him out of the way to create a gap for the running back to go through.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
There used to be an american football league in Europe but it was not successful.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_Europe[^]
IMO, having a London based team (6 hours away from its closest competitor) is not a good idea; distance and different time zone would kill TV audiences in Europe (and TV is how NFL survives).
I'm all for 2, 3 games per years in different countries; it makes a nice show.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: IMO, having a London based team (6 hours away from its closest competitor) is not a good idea; distance and different time zone would kill TV audiences in Europe (and TV is how NFL survives). Certainly a concern. I wonder if delayed broadcast or DVR use would mitigate the problem.
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: TV is how NFL survives
In fact, that is how the NFL thrives and keeps expanding. The activities on the field and frequent stop action are quite convenient for commercials, beer and bathroom breaks.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
We all know that football is the correct term for what we know as soccer and Europeans can't call american football "football". So, what would you call it then?
|
|
|
|
|
Let them call it... Lompas.
Large Overpaid Men Pushing And Shoving
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: what would you call it then?
The germans: We call it blitzkrieg.
The Brazilians: That about covers it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've no idea, but OT: my old group (The Woodville Household) once provided the half time entertainment for the London Monarchs (at White Hart Lane, no less). It was pretty mental charging onto the field in full 15th century armour with the crowd roaring.
If I learnt one thing that day it's that Groundsmen really don't like you dragging cannon over their pitch. Oops.
Anna
Tech Blog | Visual Lint
"Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"
|
|
|
|
|
Anna-Jayne! Holy crap! It's been a very long time since I've see you post.
How's life treating you?
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
I'm good...just a very busy bunny these days. That's a good thing, I think.
Hope things are going well for you too!
Anna
Tech Blog | Visual Lint
"Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't the "N" stand for "national"?
Oh wait.
We're talking sports mentality, so I shouldn't expect anything resembling common sense.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I've started to get into it recently, nothing to do with the London games but because it's on here late at night over the Weekends which suits me well as my Missus is usually studying then so I get the box to myself.
I even know some of the players too, although mostly Quaterbacks.
I'm struggling to choose a team to support though.
|
|
|
|
|
Huh. Nothing about the Dallas team's hashtag? :p
|
|
|
|
|
What is your favorite?
I like my kindle for enjoyment reading. Fiction
But for technical books. Safaribooksonline is great.
Any one else have ideas? Inputs?
super started it on a page after this. I just though I would expand the other discussion from just kindle.
To err is human to really mess up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
I liked the racing cars you could put together...mostly I liked the themed toys, I remember once there was a Pink panther collection I had all but one, my parents spent a fortune on eggs trying to get the last one.
|
|
|
|
|
My daughter wanted to collect all the penguins, but she figured out that the ones with penguins in where heavier than the ones with the car kits, which saved me a small fortune.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
For fiction and 'stuff I can get for free using it' I use my paperwhite kindle.
Technical and reference stuff I can't read on a device. I scribble notes, add post-its and brutalize books, so I always buy hard copies.
|
|
|
|
|
Old as I am, I seem to have gone off hard copy. PDF is my staple for technical stuff, and it didn't read nicely on my kindle. So I'm stuck behind my laptop, and a massive pile of tech books to catch up on.
I say "didn't" because I left the thing on the damned train a while ago, and my self employment (read: between jobs) budget is severely under pressure now.
|
|
|
|
|
Over the years, I have accumulated an immense collection of books, because I do an immense amount of research on a lot of subjects.
I haven't even opened one of them in at least five years.
If you're seriously looking for information, hard copy is just too damned slow, and, because all too many books aren't structured in a way that's, shall we say, optimal, it can be too damned easy to miss important details.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I have always (with the exception of a certain brand of hair products) heard the word "suave" combined with "debonair" - never standalone (and vice versa).
In the past it has been applied to men like Cary Grant ("Cary Grant is suave and debonair"); in modern times, two obvious candidates for such a description are Pierce Brosnan and, say, Ndamukong Suh.
But I wonder: is it possible to be "suave" but not debonair? Debonair but not suave? If so, please give some examples. e.g., is Ted Nugent suave but not debonair? Is Barack Obama debonair but not suave?
Would it, in fact -- since these two adjectives seem inseparably linked -- actually be a "backhanded compliment" to call someone "suave" OR "debonair" (not both)? IOW, would calling someone suave be tantamount to saying they are decidedly NOT debonair? Similarly, would calling someone debonair be tantamount to saying they are decidedly NOT suave?
|
|
|
|