|
Rosetta is going to land on the Comet today, event will happen at 9:35 ~ 9:45 GMT+1.
Live-streams are on! Wish for the best and a safe Landing.
Landing will probably take about 7h +30 min for response of Philae.
Im am excited 
*UPDATE* 10:07 (Can't turn sound on at work :P)
According to the stream and the happy faces on there it seems like separation went well.
Landing procedure is now in progress.
Let's cross fingers Philae doesnt bounce of that iceblock 
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
modified 12-Nov-14 4:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
HobbyProggy wrote: Live-streams are on!
Was your plan not to share any link to those streams, in case we overload the server?
|
|
|
|
|
So we really have to wait for touchdown today[^]?
(yes|no|maybe)*
|
|
|
|
|
This individual[^]
I'm going to write part 3 this weekend just to spite him/her.
|
|
|
|
|
You're the sole recipient of all of this persons activity (all three messages of it)? Boy, aren't you lucky! 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
|
|
|
|
|
JMK-NI wrote: part 3 this weekend
What about part 4?
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
|
JMK-NI wrote: 2027
That's it?!?
That's all we get for your second posting on the subject?!?
When's the third?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Take it as a compliment, you did such a good job with 1 & 2 that you can elicit this sort of reaction. I noticed there were a few requests for part 3, so I'd be proud of the work you have done!
With the reaction I saw in the comments I may actually work through the articles and see if I can get a handle on the MVC pile of crap.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Responding to such provocations is feeding a Troll. Better to report what you think is a pattern of "revenge downvoting," or harassment, on the Spam/Abuse forum.
« I am putting myself to the fullest possible use which is all, I think, that any conscious entity can ever hope to do » HAL (Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer) in "2001, A Space Odyssey"
|
|
|
|
|
Why worry about it, write part III and forget about him/her.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.0
There's a fine line between crazy and free spirited and it's usually a prescription.
I'm currently unsupervised, I know it freaks me out too but the possibilities are endless.
|
|
|
|
|
A troll with a brand new account can not make many damage except from being annoying.
His votes have very, very low weight in the punctuation. One of them is not even being considered by the system due to deviation. Hover the mouse on the votes stats and see it yourself
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The best place to discuss this is the Article writing[^] forum. If any article has been closed inappropriately it's extremely simple to post a message their and ask for help, or to email us at submit@codeproject.com and see what's going on.
Lots of articles have links to working demos. It seems odd (and wrong) to have your article closed because of that.
I'm happy to get this sorted out for you if you wish.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
No ads. Nothing to sell. On any of my domains.
Example 1: -removed link-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots of articles have links to working demos. It seems odd (and wrong) to have your article closed because of that.
Thank you. To clarify, the articles were updated to have demo links removed, not closed. Otherwise, we are in agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
So what would you like to do now?
I, and it seems the majority of the community, would like to see your articles back. I've gone through your tips and can't see anything that violates our submission guidelines.
I'll be happy to restore your articles for you, though it's your call. I do, however, hope to see your articles live again.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
 Excellent, thank you. Can you restore the previously unedited versions?
My apologies if I am coming off as taking it personal, but after putting effort into publishing tips and experiments, I was unsure how they would be received by the community (positive/negative). I received positive feedback.
Some of the tips have been sitting around unedited for 6-8 months with bookmarks and high marks. Then, within the last day or two,  they were suddenly edited. If it is good enough for March and May, then why edit them in November?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have no concerns. I stated what transpired and asked the community if they have had a similar experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The articles and content were fine. Positive feedback was received with a few bookmarks. I removed the articles because someone decided that a link to show a working demo of the code somehow creates some sort of self-promotion for a page that does not contain ads and doesn't actually sell anything.
|
|
|
|
|
No it doesn't, but it also doesn't tell me very much about anything.
If it had a title that said; "Below is an example of the gallery sample from the article "image Gallery Sample XYZ" over at CodeProject" and then linked back to the article it would make for sense.
|
|
|
|
|
The link is an example that the "working demo" link isn't some way of trying to promote a particular product. Within the CP articles, I had "working demo" links to show users how the code will look when it works.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
