|
Yours!
And please, remember to remove the nails this time...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that the depth of tastelessness' bottom, and the shallowness of content, that Lounge posts probe will never discover any ultimate nadir, or zenith. For which, we do not give thanks, but indifference.
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
Dear God.
It's one thing to make jokes about misogyny, but it's another thing entirely to be a misogynistic joke.
She's got a phud in Physics, too. What is the world coming to when someone like that doesn't know better?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any final date for unity5 release ?
|
|
|
|
|
Unity knows well - however Unity 4.6[^] just got released, why don't you just check and use this one instead of waiting for a later version to come and show off?
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
It will release in 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Handed?
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
It's all about the youth in Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
Someone mentioned Asia?
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh, thought control. When they can control what you say, they control what you think.
One thing you should not think is that such things only happen in China. The nonsense in advertising, our beloved buzzwords or political correctness work very much the same way.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
|
|
|
|
|
These are words of wisdom CDP1802.
Not Confucius says but: CDP1802 says....
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
|
|
|
|
|
Methinks a tin-pot politician or three must have names that lend themselves to puns, so that makes such legislation absolutely essential.
I'll ask the missus to have a snoop.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I heartily suggest that all CPers should consider Hao this might affect Yu. Hu knows Wen the NSA will give it a try?!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not so sure: Some of the puns on here ought to be illegal!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Once I commented on an article, stating that the subject and the code are violating the ToS of YouTube (5.1-C), and told that author should put his abilities to better use...
I got downvotes than and today too and the article gained over 100 5 votes...
And I think to myself, are you using online services against its ToS if owner do not enforce it?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
If you think an article (or any other post) here is violating any laws or ToS, then you should report it in either the Article forum or Bugs'n'Sugs.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: If you think an article (or any other post) here is violating any laws or ToS
You meant just CodeProject's ToS, or ToS of random internet service? If it is latter, well then, I guess a good chunk of articles should be wiped out from this site.
|
|
|
|
|
I mean any. If CodeProject publishes an article that is in breach of some law or agreement then it, as well as the author, can be held liable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A ToS agreement is a private agreement, so the legal system will only care about it if one party wishes to complain that another party hasn't upheld the agreement.
A third party (in this case CP) has no right to get involved unless legally petitioned to do so by one of the parties to the agreement, so it stands as a case of it being none of our business.
I'm curious what kind of complaint could be made by youtube, though. The copyright issues involved in that site are horrendously convoluted.
E.g. it might well be the case that uploaders to youtube could raise complaints if their personal videos are downloaded following advice taken from a CP article, but against whom would/could/should they direct their complaints/petitions?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: I'm curious what kind of complaint could be made by youtube The only issue of any relevance is whether they would bring a civil case against codeProject.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: The only issue of any relevance is whether they would bring a civil case against codeProject. For what? CP doesn't copy youtube's page scripts, and youtube doesn't hold copyright on anything else, e.g. the video content on their pages.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: For what? For whatever they want, in this litigious age.
|
|
|
|
|
ToSs are written to be ignored. They're a convenient source of bullshit excuses if they ever want to ban someone though.
|
|
|
|