|
No I can't. Nearly same thing in ice hockey (my favorite). And in ice hockey it becomes strange, at least in europe (I hope not in Canada/US)...one is not allowed to disturb/check a player when he is not near the puck.....
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
...Undo of my message just before.....
*lol* I like clipboard...so try again:
No I can't. Nearly same thing in ice hockey (my favorite). And in ice hockey it becomes strange, at least in europe (I hope not in Canada/US)...one is not allowed to disturb/check a player when he is not near the puck.....
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Bruno Sprecher wrote: one is not allowed to disturb/check a player when he is not near the puck..... Pretty sure its the same in Canada / US hockey.
Contrary to popular belief, nobody owes you anything.
|
|
|
|
|
That is sad info. Hockey is a something like a "combative" Sport...played it for nearly 20 years (and yes I was not successful). Why the hell it is not longer allowed to press a player to avoid that he can Change the game....for this I'm missing the "good" old time.
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously? That is dumb. Why don't the game officials provide the balls and then you wouldn't get this issue?
|
|
|
|
|
Or have the teams play with each other's balls.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. Baseball, basketball, hockey all do it that way. The way the NFL operates it almost begs for teams to "bend the rules".
|
|
|
|
|
... and you don't want to get started on cricket balls (although deflated is never a problem!)
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
I cringed when I read the headline for this post?
Glad it turned out not to have anything to do with an emasculator.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.0
My goal in life is to have a psychiatric disorder named after me.
I'm currently unsupervised, I know it freaks me out too but the possibilities are endless.
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: emasculator Was that one of Arnie's roles?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
My boss has designed a practical test to be used during interviews for new members of our database team, and asked me to sit it. Apparently I've got the job I can still bullshit with the best of them!
|
|
|
|
|
I would negotiate the future payment.
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations!
That means you'll be getting two salaries, now?
|
|
|
|
|
I have not done an interview/test in 15 years, I suspect my bullshit capability may have slipped!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
The guy who turned up today to take the test scored high on the bullshit monitor - the boss recognised him and checked the personnel records - he worked for the company about 7 years ago, and was sacked after three months. His CV said that he was working for a different company in that timespan.
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
In the UK I interviewed a DBA who I had sacked 3 years before in Oz, he dropped the production database and had backed up the master DB 3 times instead of the production DBs.
He got the job as he was the best of a bad lot <facepalm>
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Metaphorically.
In the early nineties, many said: "I do OO correctly; you don't understand OO".
Now, they seem to say: "I work on Big Data; you don't understand Big Data".
Is there a similarity?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, neither are a silver bullet
|
|
|
|
|
Had to look up what Big Data stands for.
From Wikipedia (fr because not in the english version):
"À titre d'exemple, Twitter générait en janvier 2013, 7 teraoctets de données chaque jour et Facebook 10 teraoctets."
As an example, Twitter creates (as for January 2013), 7 terabytes of data per day, Facebook, 10 terabytes.
That is indeed one shitload of crap
|
|
|
|
|
It's only crap if you don't understand Big Data(tm)
For those who do understand Big Data(tm) it can be used to provide incredible insights into the human condition. Now this data and the software systems to mine it are available the imponderables become ponderable - I, for one, will never have to ponder about what my idiot mate in Godalming is having for his tea.
|
|
|
|
|
Cucumber sarnies?
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
RugbyLeague wrote: For those who do understand Big Data(tm) it can be used to provide incredible
insights into the human condition. You sound like you're selling something. What incredible insight did mankind get from the huge amount of tweets? Humor me, which part of the human condition have we learned to understand thanks to the accumulation of 140-character messages?
It's helpfull in targetted advertising, but that's about it. And yes, advertising should be banned.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: That is indeed one shitload of crap
That's somewhat redundant. But regardless, I feel I just contributed to the shitload of crap on CP!
[edit] Oops, I just realized what I was implying. Um, sorry folks, I wasn't implying that CP has a shitload of crap, I simply meant that I was creating crap on CP!!! I think I'll go back to my hole now before I put more of my foot in my mouth. [/edit]
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hope you didn't put it in the crap first?
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|