|
Well, you can watch the program but the essence is that it is based on twin studies and adopted kids etc. It's not the case that it is solely based on gens compared to nurture, but without genes somethings are impossible. However, no one is saying that you cant ruin your kids with poor parenting.
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Haugland wrote: Well, you can watch the program but the essence is that it is based on twin
studies and adopted kids etc. I bookmarked it; limited bandwidth here.
With genotypes being equal, only the fenotype would matter. That would include interaction with everyone. Including the grandparents old dog. Or a church. Did I mention advertising yet? More interaction would logically mean more influence on each future action.
Equally, "values" come from all kinds of places; they're a product of what you experienced. Children sociallize earlier today than they used to. It may hold true that the apple didn't fall far from the tree, and that most values in the past came from a limited circle and have been reinforced for a longer period.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
That's easy enough to answer for my personal case.
I'm having a pretty distinct dialect from a different part of the country than what we live in.
My wife has a foreign accent.
Our kids speak like the other kids.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: I'm having a pretty distinct dialect
Skåne?
|
|
|
|
|
Värmland, bordering to Norway.
Have been asked more than once by people from Stockholm if I'm Norwegian. Something a Norwegian certainly wouldn't understand
|
|
|
|
|
Not as strange as it might seem; In 1250-1350 Jämtland, Härjedalen and Värmland belonged to Norway. After the Kalmar union it was split up a little different.
|
|
|
|
|
We all become our parents at some point.
|
|
|
|
|
CafedeJamaica wrote: We all become our parents at some point.
I am king of general statements, so I think I have a right to say that your comment, well, is a general statement.
I think that statement can be true, if the individual doesn't make a specific effort to NOT be like their parents. Also, being like your parents isn't always a bad deal. Some parents are down right cool.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it was a negative but you only get one set of parents be happy you didn't get the wrong ones.
|
|
|
|
|
This one will be too easy for you chaps. Anyway, here you go:
Crazy love with endless quote, why? (8)
Sorry, don't think I can possibly embed the definition in the clue. Hope this one doesn't lead to multiple solutions.
Good luck!
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy love - velo
endless quote - quo
why - y
veloquoy. I understand how it was complicated to find a definition.
|
|
|
|
|
You are avoiding to set one up for Monday, aren't you?
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
So the one winning sets the next one up ? Sorry, must have been living under a rock again.
Then I am glad (for you guys) that I did not find it : If I am even twice better at setting them up than finding the answer, it'd still be awful.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: So the one winning sets the next one up ?
Yep - that's why is WSO CCC: Winner Stays On Cryptic Crossword Clue.
Whoever solves it posts the next weekday clue.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but that's incorrect. I actually don't believe you didn't get it in your first reply. I thought you deliberately replied with incorrect solution.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I am really that bad at solving CCCs. Believe me.
|
|
|
|
|
Well then you will be surprised when you realize the solution and how close you were.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
*sees solution* *facepalm*
|
|
|
|
|
I told you so!
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy love VELO
with endless quote, CITe (lose the E)
why Y
VELOCITY
You need to give some clue as to the final word:
"Speed crazy love with endless quote, why?"(8)
Perhaps...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I thought that but that wasn't "fitting" in the clue properly and also Speed != Velocity, is it?
And I didn't think it would be a good idea to include "rate of change of displacement with time".
Anyway, you are up for Monday.
-- EDIT
OriginalGriff wrote: You need to give some clue as to the final word Is that a hard-and-fast rule?
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
modified 6-Feb-15 12:07pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't have to be exact, just a "close enough fit" - without it, it isn't a "full clue". If it doesn;t work, pick a different word and start again.
Agent__007 wrote: Anyway, you are up for Monday
Damn!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty!
And I'm glad you have it and not me...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|