|
I'm pretty sure a large amount of the files could be safely eliminated but any project that requires that much support just to create a basic app is going to struggle to gain traction. The complexity of having to deal with all of that for a simple application is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously?
I use (and have been using VS 2015), but I NEVER generate MS projects. I fully expect new project = ONE file! Or at least no more than four (to include makefiles, etc.). That web application has more files and folders than I have in my personal framework that I have been building for a quarter century! Including all of the "projects" that I have built using it.
Something is wrong with that. Glad I don't use it.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a docking station that is plugged through USB (USB 3.0 pro dock from Lenovo).
I do have a couple of extra displays connected there.
In order to have a taskbar in all the displays (windows 7) I have a small program that make a copy of the taskbar to appear in all the displays.
I would like to load automatically at the beginning (boot) this program only if the docking station is connected (external keyboard, mouse, displays and network are the devices that are always connected there).
Do you think this could be done without programming?
As always thank you in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely a non-coding question then Probably... maybe... not quite sure how though. It would be quite easy to write a launcher though - just detect the number of screens and if it's more than one launch the taskbar duplicator. System.Windows.Forms.Screen.AllScreens will do the trick
What you are using to duplicate the task bar? I tried several programs a while back but couldn't find one I'm entirely happy with. Thx
|
|
|
|
|
Now I'm trying Actual Multiple Monitors which works fairly well.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe not be a lot of help for Win7, but Win 10 supports this directly. Right-click on the Task Bar, select Properties, and check "Show Task Bar on all displays"
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, since Windows 8 this comes by default, but not on Windows 7.
Having two extra displays makes it almost a need.
|
|
|
|
|
check out scheduled tasks. There are a LOT of options there for triggers - including system-level events - that you might be able to pull off what you want. click Start, type 'task schedule' and you're off.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, I will check it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By now I'm happy with the software I'm testing, the only issue is that I don't want it to load automatically at boot because some times my laptop is not connected to the extra displays...
But thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am of the age to remember the first break out of VR the Head sets that were awkwardly heavy etc. I went with some friends to Bletchly Park and National Museum of Computing or what ever they call it last Sunday and had my first go with an Oculus Rift headset. The first thing, you can't wear glasses (I do, blind without 'em) so did not have good feelings going in, the thing is it corrects for your vision I guess as I could see fine. Very,very cool . I'm not a big gamer, but it was a little odd to see the BBC B playing Elite and then the Oculus
playing Elite Dangerous. I know oculus is not the only company in this field at the moment but if the rest can catch up it will be fight. The interface seems odd 2 USBs and a HDMI. I can see a first person shooter like Doom being generally terrifying
Also was CP down today around midday (UK) as I couldn't get on!
|
|
|
|
|
Doom was scary on a monitor - spectators used to lean sideways to avoid Imp fireballs!
Now, Unreal Tournament 2004 in immersive 3D... FUN, FUN, FUN!!!
But I'm betting the Big Thing that sells a million of 'em involves Pr0n...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Big Thing [...] Pr0n
fnar, fnar!
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh! Of course, you are back
|
|
|
|
|
Well Pr0n, yes, I think that was one of the reasons colour printing got good! but yes Unreal Tournament. What I found odd was the way I could see without my glasses!!!
|
|
|
|
|
When I had LASIK a few years back, I was blown away that my doctor had a device to calculate (accurately), my prescription.
I literally sat in front of the device, and looked at a blob, that eventually focused as a full color hot air balloon. It gave me BOTH my -2.5 reading and my astigmatism. It blew my mind.
I asked the doctor how it worked, he said: Same tech that is in an autofocus camera. While you are looking at the object, the system is sending a beam of light to bounce off your eye. It sees that light, and adjusts the lenses to clean up what it sees coming out. At which point, it has a "good" reading of your prescription. Very similar to how you read a prescription from a pair of glasses.
It just blew my mind.
The doctor said when he goes to areas that cannot speak english, or with people who cannot understand the old (is this better, or this)... They use this device, get the reading, and it is good enough to get them seeing again...
|
|
|
|
|
Wow!
|
|
|
|
|
Or gin.
|
|
|
|
|
I would buy this one[^], but it's for a totally different purpose[^].
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
modified 2-Sep-15 13:47pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That hurts my eyes just to watch on YouTube!
I think it's the "focussed center only" which is nasty.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I have already tried a small cheap camera to record during normal flying. As Igor Sikorsky already noticed: Helicopters cost a lot, make fine clouds of dust and every part vibrates. I have not yet found a good way to dampen the vibrations enough for a good stable picture.
Believe me, all I have up to now looks far worse than this video. There are two alternatives up to now. Either attach the camera as tightly as possible to the frame of the helicopter, possibly with rubber dampeners from an old CD drive inbetween, or suspend the camera by tightly stretched rubber bands between the skids.
Or buy a fancy gimbal with motion tracking and stabilization. Look here[^], just skip the talk. Just note the difference between the cheap camera recording the gimbal and the FPV camera, but there still are some vibrations.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Mmm, First person drone dueling?
|
|
|
|
|
Pshhht. Don't call a T-Rex 550 a drone. The one sitting on the shelf right behind my chair might be insulted.
Helicopters usually are more agile and faster than multicopters. But the idea is not bad. Mount a laser on the camera gimbal and use motion tracking to let the camera and laser look wherever you turn your head. Then we only need sensors on the fuselages to register hits.
For now I would settle for some nice air footage. 60 miles south from here the Alps begin, so I might get a little fresh air and look for some suitable scenery.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Sir, I was not (had a Google for T-Rex 550, nice look 'copter!), there was talk of drone combat a few month ago...
|
|
|
|