|
hapiten wrote: What is QA? QA is a group of Forums right here on CodeProject.
Each forum is a friendly place where some of the most talented programmers in the world are ready and willing to write your software for you; however, there is one catch: you need to know the top-secret code-word that tells these programmers you are serious: the secret word moves you, immediately, to the front of the queue.
The code word is: "gimmez." Be sure and use that word in either the title of your post, or in the first line of your explanation of what you want.
«In art as in science there is no delight without the detail ... Let me repeat that unless these are thoroughly understood and remembered, all “general ideas” (so easily acquired, so profitably resold) must necessarily remain but worn passports allowing their bearers short cuts from one area of ignorance to another.» Vladimir Nabokov, commentary on translation of “Eugene Onegin.”
|
|
|
|
|
Feeling a little bitter today, Bill?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: The code word is: "gimmez."
I thought it was "urgent" I've been doing it wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
That's "URGNTZZZ!!!" and it's the keyword for "Do my homework, I need to hand it in in an hour"
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Go to Freelancer.com and ask there.
But be aware: you get what you pay for. Pay peanuts, get monkeys.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Pay peanuts, get monkeys elephants.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah...elephants never forget. We're talking RentACoder here - they never learn!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Pay peanuts, get monkeys elephants squirrels.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
A word of caution - a CRM is generally a very large and complex piece of business software.
Depending on your specification - you may be better off buying something off the shelf although it will not come cheap.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
So, first day on the job and your BS CV has got you in the s#it eh?
|
|
|
|
|
While coming to office today, I noticed some yellow thing flutter. I was just under my right eye on the balaclava. I ignored it for a while and kept riding. Then started feeling weird in right eye so stopped to check. Nothing in helmet, nothing in balaclava, nothing in the eye.
Somehow my mind tells me it was a tiny spider.
I tried doing that SpiderMan thing with hands to see if it works now, but I ended up looking stupid in office. I still feel there is something in my right eye.
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
It takes a while before it starts working. Just keep doing those wrist flip motions around the office...
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature">
<first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last>
</sig>
|
|
|
|
|
Radioactive spider venom isn't instant acting - wait until lunchtime, and then try to crawl on the ceiling.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
No comeback? You were overwhelmed by a desire to fall into a bathtub and can't get out out again, weren't you?
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
I had a second look at Code Contract[^] yesterday night (after reading Joe Duffy's latest blog post on error[^]).
Mmm... I might give them a go.. But I am curious, is anyone here reading this using them?
What's your ... feedback / impression / experience like with them?
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
I never rarely do something just because someone else says I should.
Even when all the other kids were jumping off a bridge, I did not.
|
|
|
|
|
No one told me to use them, but I got this thing named curiosity... You have heard of it ya?
Beside Code contract seems to come with this static compiler analysis thing which looks interesting....
I take it you have no experience with Code Contract then!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sander, there's a rumour going around that Pete O'Hanlon uses pixels made from aeternium and veracium, so his content is never inaccurate. I suspect it's true.
I'd like to use those myself, but all I can afford is temporarium and probabilium:
they want years off your life to even get the starter-kit for what Pete is using.
I can't even afford a smidgen of griffium, or deemium. Yes, there's always kruykovium, which is basically free in exchange for your soul, but I don't have enough shielding to handle its high read-io-activity.
cheers, Bill
«In art as in science there is no delight without the detail ... Let me repeat that unless these are thoroughly understood and remembered, all “general ideas” (so easily acquired, so profitably resold) must necessarily remain but worn passports allowing their bearers short cuts from one area of ignorance to another.» Vladimir Nabokov, commentary on translation of “Eugene Onegin.”
|
|
|
|
|
There's so much funny in that post, but this part in particular made me laugh
BillWoodruff wrote: there's always kruykovium, which is basically free in exchange for your soul, but I don't have enough shielding to handle its high read-io-activity I know someone else who would love it too (he has a lot of griffium)!
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent info Sander, thank you and Peter!
Gotta have a look!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi: curiosity is an excellent attitude ! You got me curious, so I went to the VS Gallery, downloaded, installed CodeContracts ... only to realize it's already baked into .NET 4.5.
It was pretty easy to set up a test-class with the three key types of contract, Ensures, Requires, ObjectInvariant, and then observe what happened as I enabled, or disabled, the various tests (code at end).
The one thing that concerns me is that every time I compile the project with this test class (after making some change), my AV software is telling me that it is doing direct disk sector access using something called 'ccrewrite.exe, which is a digitally unsigned file:
File information according to the publisher of the detected file (may be faked) (ccrewrite.exe):
Company: Microsoft Corporation
File description: CCRewrite
Copyright: (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
File version: 1.9.10714.2 While PostSharp may be doing something similar to modify code, I never see notificaition like this (perhaps because PostSharp is using a signed something-or-other ?).
The test class code:
public class testContract
{
private int? _testInt;
public int? testInt
{
get
{
?>() != null);
return this._testInt;
}
set
{
Contract.Requires(value != null);
_testInt = value;
}
}
public testContract(int? testinput)
{
testInt = testinput;
}
[ContractInvariantMethod]
void ObjectInvariant()
{
//Contract.Invariant(_testInt != null);
}
} I note that configuring how CodeContracts will handle validation fails involves a Panel in Project/Properties/Code Contracts that has a complex number of options.
I like the idea of catching errors before they occur ! There's still so much functionality in PostSharp I haven't explored; will be interesting to see what it might/doesn't offer in terms of constraints.
You may have seen my blurb about Jeremy Pinker's interesting 'FluentValidation open-source project here, recently [^], another interesting approach to bomb-proofing code. Of course, I am not implying direct comparison to 'CodeContracts here, since you use 'FluentValidation on 'instances of objects at run-time, not compile-time.
Take a look at this example of 'FluentValidations syntax" (example by the FV author, taken from here: [^]):
public class MyClass {
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Address { get; set; }
public string OldPassword { get; set; }
public string NewPassword {get;set;}
public string ConfirmPassword {get;set;}
}
public class MyValidator : AbstractValidator<MyClass> {
public MyValidator() {
RuleSet("NameAddressRuleset", () => {
RuleFor(x => x.Id).NotEmpty();
RuleFor(x => x.Name).NotEmpty();
RuleFor(x => x.Address).NotEmpty();
});
RuleSet("PasswordRuleset", () => {
RuleFor(x => x.OldPassword).NotEmpty();
RuleFor(x => x.NewPassword).NotEmpty();
RuleFor(x => x.NewPassword).Equal(x => x.ConfirmPassword);
});
}
}
«In art as in science there is no delight without the detail ... Let me repeat that unless these are thoroughly understood and remembered, all “general ideas” (so easily acquired, so profitably resold) must necessarily remain but worn passports allowing their bearers short cuts from one area of ignorance to another.» Vladimir Nabokov, commentary on translation of “Eugene Onegin.”
modified 26-Feb-16 7:12am.
|
|
|
|