|
Just hit a 10 years old bug with C# compiler. After making changes for hours and trusting that a successful compile is also running smoothly I ran into this bug when running tests on the application...
Now to spend some more hours to create a reasonable workaround. Can't believe that this kind of bug still exists in VS2015 after being reported back in 2007...
Added:
I need to try to build a simple test case to ensure that this really is a bug and not because of mistakes my code...
modified 14-Jan-17 23:11pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Mika Wendelius wrote: Can't believe that this kind of bug still exists in VS2015 after being reported back in 2007
Don't you know that each bug report is printed in triple copy and used to wipe thei arses when they run out of toilet paper?
DURA LEX, SED LEX
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I don't think they wait until they run out!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Not the only one: Designer Support when Control has abstract base class[^] was a problem with .NET 1.0 and is still unfixed. You still have to create an intermediate concrete class to derive your controls from. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I was bit by this one back in the days when I was still doing winform development.
|
|
|
|
|
Love the response..
Quote: Posted by Alex [MSFT] on 8/29/2008 at 1:30 AM
Thanks for another great bug report, nikov!
We'd love to fix this, but we're unfortunately getting to the point where we have to make the tough cuts and we won't be able to get to this bug for this release.
Alex Turner
Program Manager
Visual C# Compiler
Or in fact, ANY release! 
Ah, I see you have the machine that goes ping. This is my favorite. You see we lease it back from the company we sold it to and that way it comes under the monthly current budget and not the capital account.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
C# is a stable and reliable language. Even the bugs are maintained 
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
There probably is code that relies on it! (Reminds me of the bad old days of Win16 developement).
DURA LEX, SED LEX
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of my favourite XKCDs of all time.
This[^] is the first I ever read, it initiated me to Randall's works.
DURA LEX, SED LEX
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't reproduce the bug in LINQPad 4 or 5, so it looks like this might actually have been fixed.
Using the code from the bug report, I get a compiler error telling me that the constraints on B.Foo must match the constraints on the base method. That's because the constrains on the overridden method require U : object[], IList<object>, whereas the constrains on the interface method require U : object[].
class B : A<object[], IList<object>>, A<object[], object[]>.IFace
After "fixing" the code to:
class B : A<object[], IList<object>>, A<object[], IList<object>>.IFace the code compiles and runs as expected.
Do you have a less esoteric example of the bug?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
The code I have is a bit more complex with inheritance included. If I have extra time at some point I'll try to create an example.
The basic idea is
interface IA<T1,T2,T3> : IDisposable
where ...
method X<T4>
where T4 : T1, new()
abstract class BaseA<T1,T2,T3> : IDisposable
where ...
public method X<T4>
where T4 : T1, new()
implementation
class A : BaseA, IA
So the interface and abstract class are not used together until in the concrete class.
|
|
|
|
|
Meh! Just report it and let MS do the diagnostics. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, not Qlikview, but the idiots that run the show here at work.
They want everyone to develop on a central server. Yesterday, at around 11:30am, this server dropped off the network, and since that time, everyone that does Qlikview work is sitting with their thumbs up their collective asses. Including yours truly.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would they need you to develop on a server?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't f*ckin know. It's simply another arbitrary and absurd requirement.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a military/gov thing. I've worked both a few times and they do stupid Sh*t like that all the time.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Could be worse, at least it's your OWN thumb.
|
|
|
|
|
Update - I submitted a help-desk ticket 3.5 hours ago, and just got a reply:
"What is the port number connected to the computer?"
What a bunch of retards...
Me: "Ping the box, idiot, and you'll see that the requests time out. This means the box has been turned off or simply exploded, or the port on the switch its connected to has failed, or maybe the box is simply overwhelmed that Trump was elected and it doesn't know what to f*ckin do with itself. Whatever the reason, we are at a full work stoppage because someone, somewhere, isn't doing their f*ckin job."
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
  
When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others.
Same thing when you are stupid.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
via Remote Desktop? Is this a DOD or NSA (or like org) project? Then it makes some obtuse sense, otherwise no.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Yes on DoD, but no, it's just a network share. The machine is just gone.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
