|
|
|
+1 to you.
You win this round (emphasis on round).
|
|
|
|
|
That 1 looks pretty flat to me!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: According to Stephen Jay Gould, "there never was a period of 'flat Earth darkness' among scholars Oh, well Stephen said it so it must be true.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
But...but...but...I (and a friend) wrote a musical whilst in High School called The World Is Flat (And That Is That) about Columbus, which depended on a widespread belief in a flat Earth.
I will not let Wikipedia ruin the premise!
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOL!
But ... but ... it's turtles all the way down!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That's a lunar eclipse, where the sun casts on the moon the shadow of The Great A'Tuin.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.
OG didn't specify the type of eclipse in his post.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I wasn't arguing any point, I was just appreciating the Discworld reference. GNU Sir Terry.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: Now, at least when I was younger, the width of the USA was 3000 miles.
That must have been a long time ago, the US is about 2680 miles across at its widest point.
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
Earthquakes (West Coast).
Other Popular Options:
- Despite what you heard, the shrinkage is not due to too high a temperature when in the dryer.
- It swells up and gets bigger if we win a war.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Being that the U.S. hasn't technically "won" a war since the Spanish-American War, it must have shrunk quite a bit.
Cannot count WW 1 & 2 as U.S. actions did not decidedly cause any nation to surrender. Brittan's tanks broke the stalemate that ended WW 1. For WW 2, the Soviet Union crushed the Wehrmacht, the end result being the collapse of Nazi Germany. Also, their defeat of the Japanese army on the mainland (in very short order) forced Japan to surrender to the U.S. so they wouldn't become a communist puppet.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
So, dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn't end the war in the Pacific? Methinks your revision of history is nonsense.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Technically, no, they did not, at least not entirely. From a damage and causality stand point, they don't compare to the damage done with conventional bombing and incendiary bombing. By analyzing the timeline, it's clear that the Japanese military didn't formally accept the Allied terms of unconditional surrender until after the Kwantung army was throttled by Red Army in Manchuria. Yes, emperor Hirohito did call for surrender but that was weeks before the military laid down their arms and only after they knew that they would not be able to hold back the Soviets.
After repeated analysis of the events, the claim that the atomic bombs ended WW 2 begins to appear as another example American exceptionalism instead of the discrete cause. We could have nuked every city that they had and they would have still kept fighting.
To go a bit further, there were good reasons for the Japanese to prefer surrendering to Allies over the Soviets. Chief among these is the Emperor of Japan. It was highly probable that the Soviets, with their anti-aristocracy ideology, would have deposed the Emperor and crushed Japanese culture. By surrendering to the Allies, losing the Emperor was a possibility but not a guarantee. Knowing that defeat was inevitable, they took the calculated risk by surrendering to us.
In the end, the Japanese got to keep their emperor and their culture which isn't bad to them considering the alternatives at the time.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would suggest giving this a read when you have time: Surrender of Japan[^] (it's a bit lengthy). It goes into quite a bit of detail about those final weeks.
Basically, until the Soviets smashed the army on the mainland, the leaders of the military refused the idea of surrender. Up until then, Hirohito's power to control the direction of the government and country had been, for all intents and purposes, usurped by the military. Once he the military realized that all hope for victory had been lost, the top brass conceded defeat. Even a coup was attempted by some officers to block the surrender.
That's why I stand by my first assertion using nuclear weapons is not the only factor contributing the conditions that made Japan surrender.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Total eclipse path does not depend on the width of the country you are living in. Even if it is USA
|
|
|
|
|
The length of the path still needs to obey the rules of Geometry - even in the USA.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eclipse path depends on several factors. The Sun and Moon diameter, distance between the Sun, Moon and the Earth. Astronomer can add more factors. But country width is not one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
You're obliviously missing the point. The OP is talking about the length of the eclipse path within the USofA, not the total eclipse path.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: the width of the USA was 3000 miles As I recall, public school taught that it was 3000 miles from San Francisco to New York. That's probably something of what you remember. Not to be taken exactly.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - but the rather long diagonal path of totality would, I'd bet, exceed that: Oregon to South Carolina.
Yet - Google Maps seems to only add a couple hundred miles to their figure.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: oogle Maps seems to only add a couple hundred miles to their figure.
Measure Distance on a Map[^] 2495, at least from where I clicked.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|