|
Have not seen how to post it in your blog...
Hope you don't mind I post it here:
#include "pch.h"
#include <iostream>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <windows.h>
#include <winuser.h>
#include <conio.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
LPCTSTR windowName = "Pregunta";
int ims = 10000;
if (argc > 1) windowName = argv[1];
if (argc > 2) ims = atoi(argv[2]);
while (true)
{
HWND hHandle = ::FindWindow(NULL, windowName);
std::cout << hHandle;
std::cout << "\r\n";
if (hHandle != NULL)
{
::PostMessage(hHandle, WM_KEYDOWN, VK_RETURN, 0x001C0001);
::PostMessage(hHandle, WM_KEYDOWN, VK_DOWN, 0x00500001);
}
Sleep(ims);
}
} Thank you for taking time to do this!
PS: the compiler must not be set to unicode to accept this as valid.
modified 16-Nov-19 9:17am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi again
Finally this does the job in my environement
HWND xWnd= FindWindow(NULL, "DlgWnd");
if (xWnd)
{
int xWatchDogCount= 0;
while(xWatchDogCount++ < 10)
{
HWND xOkBtnWnd = FindWindowEx(xWnd, NULL, NULL, "OK");
if (xOkBtnWnd)
{
PostMessage(xOkBtnWnd, WM_KEYDOWN, VK_SPACE, 0);
PostMessage(xOkBtnWnd, WM_KEYUP, VK_SPACE, 0);
}
}
}
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
@Daniel_Pfeiffer posted how to get modern visual studios to be able to link for windows XP...
I'll follow that advice.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at AutoHotKey, there may be a suitable script.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's almost the same code I've done...
Mine works perfectly (like yours) but I was not able to put the executable in windows XP...
I've got a suggestion explaining how to get Visual Studio to be able to link for XP.
I'll do that.
THANKS for answering!
|
|
|
|
|
Joan M wrote: The problem is that what is output from my Visual Studio is not compatible anymore with windows xp...
For Visual Studio 2017 or 2019:
- Open the Visual Studio Installer
- Click "Modify"
- Select the "Individual Components" tab
- Scroll down, and select the "Windows XP support for C++" option
This should enable you to target Windows XP (it will appear as a separate option in the list of toolsets)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
SUPER!
I'll try it thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
thank you, I've done a small program after setting the linker to link for XP.
|
|
|
|
|
The output from Visual Studio is compatible with XP when you build with the XP-compatible toolchain.
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't know that, already done, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
i would prefer to do a prorgram targeted approach... and wrap around the MessageBox* function so the messagebox would never appear at all, and all required would be a change from user32.dll to userMy.dll where userMy.dll i would forward all functions to user32.dll minus the MessageBox ones...
altough its also possible to do by injecting a dll on the process and detouring... and even possible with a global hooking for dialog creation (using the MessageBox template), dont know programs for that
as usually i do more targeted than generic approaches... but imo its very easy to do
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a registry entry in Windows XP that will automatically click on the default reply for a messagebox.
See Enabling Default Reply
|
|
|
|
|
that logical appeals were more persuasive to people and emotional appeals were more persuasive to my compiler.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Be careful for what you wish
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: ... and emotional appeals were more persuasive to my compiler. - but then mine would surely hate me for the 'tone' of my 'appeals'.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Upsetting your compiler may not be the best thing to do
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Deep insight on the plight of the programmer!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah.
"C'mon, really???"
Would result in the compiler returning "OK, I'll try harder, sorry"
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: honey the codewitch wrote: logical appeals were more persuasive to people and emotional appeals were more persuasive to my compiler.
Quote: "Brevity is the soul of wit."
You've nailed it here.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: and emotional appeals were more persuasive to my compiler.
When that happens I will finally admit that we have achieved true AI.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a new PC, wooohoo!
Also have ADSL2+ (I guess it's kind of ok but getting a bit behind the time, thanks Australia!)
And I have been downloading a small selection of my game library non stop since Wednesday!
But I was getting almost there... But there was a promo code for my video card (which was a pain to redeem btw) but it eventually happened and I unlocked "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare"
And then I went to download that..... 120 GB download! WTH!
This take the crown as the most bloated download yet by far!
|
|
|
|