|
I don't trust you, you're kidding me once more...
anyway
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: (although only half of the equation is ever mentioned).
Do you mean the part about, if the economy goes down the drains, we can't pay for the hospitals any more and a lot more people are going to die?
|
|
|
|
|
And the people who live are out of money, can't pay their mortgage or their rent, have to visit the food bank and are overall just very stressed, tired and unhappy which leads to health issues and earlier deaths
|
|
|
|
|
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just not a fan of Queen
|
|
|
|
|
Don't see the relation, sorry
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
At first, I was just replying to Jörgen's post, who's kind of a buzzkill so I just rolled with that.
Then you replied to me and I just told you, unrelated, I'm not a fan of Queen, which is also a bit of a buzzkill, but which came easy after Jörgen's initial buzzkill and my buzzkilling reply.
All in all this is turning into quite the buzzkill.
So let me just finish off by saying, yes, we shouldn't focus so much on the economy and instead focus a bit more on the things that matter.
When this is over, find a job closer to home, take the bike to work, talk to strangers on the subway, spend more time with your family.
The economy was booming, but we were all (generalizing) stressed out and slowly killing the planet.
Roll over economy, make room for happiness!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: to let me just finish off by saying, yes, we shouldn't focus so much on the economy and instead focus a bit more on the things that matter.
I'm released you are a good one Serious: Sorry if I responded too angree with too much
[Edit]
I like Queen/Mercury but I think that is really a detail
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Sorry if I responded too angree with too much Sorry if I responded with too much sarcasm and dark humor
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: we shouldn't focus so much on the economy and instead focus a bit more on the things that matter. We can do both. It won't do anyone any good for all of us to come out of this healthy but unemployed.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote:
So let me just finish off by saying, yes, we shouldn't focus so much on the economy and instead focus a bit more on the things that matter. I know quite a few people who simply are not getting this. What do you mean: Things that matter, but NOT economy?
(One of the guys I don't know personally, but see him for an hour or two every night nowadays.)
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: And the people who live are out of money, can't pay their mortgage or their rent, have to visit the food bank and are overall just very stressed, tired and unhappy which leads to health issues and earlier deaths not dead. Wow, that was a Hell of a typo!
Were you going for the record?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
My hand must've slipped because the cat bumped into it.
modified 5-Apr-20 17:33pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you learned nothing from politicians?
You should have blamed the cat.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So as I was saying, my hand slipped because the cat bumped into it
|
|
|
|
|
Better.
You may now apply for membership of the democrat club.
A few decades' diligent practice and experience, and you may even make it into the other club.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Well edited!
Let the record show that the honourable gentleman has at no time said that his hand slipped without being bumped by the cat.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
And everyone who says otherwise is FAKE NEWS!
Vote Rossel 2020
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: And everyone who says otherwise is FAKE NEWS! Yes, they're very bad people. They should be nice to you, if they want you to be nice to them -- quid-pro-quo walls WORK!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Hysteria doesn't become you.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't seem to me that I'm the hysterical one.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, Guv, [doffs cap] I forgot abaht yer innate superiority over me.
OK, then since it's not hysteria, and you genuinely, logically, and rationally believe that a few stockholders losing 10% of their unearned money (because everything else will be "business as usual" within a month or two) will result in hospital closures and massive amounts of death, how about we have a little bet on the side?
I'll go ten-thousand euros that not one hospital will close in the West because of the coronavirus.
Is that OK, or do you want to up the ante? I mean, it's not a hysterical rant that hospitals will close, is it? So you can't lose, and I can afford to. Works for everyone.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Sorry, Guv, [doffs cap] I forgot abaht yer innate superiority over me.
Now you're being ridiculous again. You could push that kind of nonsense on the soapbox.
I don't give a sh*t about stock holders, but when companies are starting to go bankrupt a lot of people will lose their jobs. They won't be paying taxes anymore, but rather will be needing unemployment benefits instead. This is all money that could be used much better.
No I don't think there will be any physical hospitals closed. But when the economic realities are catching up with us, there will not be any excess money for any advanced medicines or equipment anymore.
That's what I meant with that we cannot pay for our hospitals any more. The buildings will certainly still be there, the personnel will mostly be there as well, but the care will be of lesser quality while we cannot pay for as much or as expensive medicine, or medical machinery.
A small reality check for you: Check how many people that is dying every year from cancer or cardiovascular deceases.
On a different note, I'm sure we will see social distancing for a very long time forward, and certain types of businesses will simply have to be sacrificed for now. For example tourism and restaurants.
But a shutdown of society that lasts for an extended time, will throw us into a downward spiral with a lot worse consequences.
|
|
|
|
|
And, as the guy in Argentina says, the economy can adapt and recover, but we can't bring people back to life.
Perhaps if it were members of your family who were at risk you would see a perspective other than "Being dead is better than being out of work for a while -- because if you're broke or out of work, things will never, ever get better, but if you're dead, things can only improve for you!"
How many people, when faced with a "Give me everything you own or I'll blow your brains out!" situation would choose the latter option?
Would you? Would you want your mother to?
So your scare stories about the all-important economy are indeed worthy of ridicule, and with me, you're often likely to get exactly what you ask for.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
My mother is dead from cancer.
|
|
|
|