|
First off, why is your post getting lots of upvotes?
Second. His plan is to overtake OG to be the first to a million points. Let the race begin.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it's possible to beat OG to 1M, at the current pace he'll be there in about one year.
Sergey will have to go 30KPM to beat him, and that is... well... exceedingly unlikely.
--
If money is your hope for independence, you cannot reach it.
Being loved gives you strength,
while loving gives you courage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some people really need adult supervision. Warning: This is going to hurt. Click[^]
XAlan Burkhart
|
|
|
|
|
Like all safety messages - staged.
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
Looked real enough to me. If they staged it they did a mighty fine job of it.
XAlan Burkhart
|
|
|
|
|
The rebound gives it away - then the injury - very Hollywood. Try to rebound a steel ball off a champagne bottle or anything else in that prop. This guy posted the way he did this elsewhere.
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
I was surprised that the ball rebounded the way it did. You may be right.
XAlan Burkhart
|
|
|
|
|
I watched this and the making of it quite a while back. There was no rebound. He actually stood by the structure and shot a ball where he was standing. Used Windows Paint to stitch it all together.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Show me a community that obeys the Ten Commandments and I'll show you a less crowded prison system." - Anonymous
|
|
|
|
|
I've been duped. Until I think of a better excuse, it's because I'm really tired.
XAlan Burkhart
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of having a BB rebound to my jewels once. Once.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Reminds me of having a BB rebound to my jewels once
When I was a kid a BB came back and popped me on the knee cap. Hurt like hell.
XAlan Burkhart
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link. It was enjoyable.
I replayed the ricochet several times (attempting to go by frame - as much as you can in a flash player) until I seen the tell-tale pixel blur on a pasted image around 1:23 to 1:24.
It was still funny though.
As DavidCrow stated, the how it was made video is available. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=bc5HUS8dLN0[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Nice! And the how-to was even better!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
The most obvious way to tell it was a fake was how perfect the camera landed when he fell. Still in perfect frame.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a program "protected" by C/R nearing release just when the long simmering opposition to C/R copy protection in the target market audio industry has boiled over.
It is getting so bad that many simply won't buy a product using C/R as if they change hardware and the small provider such as myself goes away then they are up a crick. I sympathize with them.
I went looking at usb dongle providers but are prohibitively expensive given the relatively inexpensive cost of my product and it's limited projected sales base.
I am more than aware that nothing is uncrackable but short of releasing a sheep to slaughter with no copy protection what so ever, what am I to do?
Thanks y'all
:Ron
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Anders wrote: limited projected sales
So, you won't lose much, why bother?
We write code for the challenge; not for money.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: We write code for the challenge; not for money.
No, we write code for the challenge and the money.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Anders wrote: long simmering opposition to C/R copy protection
They obviously want it for free as this does not seem too onerous a requirement to use software. C/R every time it runs is another matter.
I know it seems a platitude but we all must ensure our software does things better than our competitors (however that is measured). This provides the incentive for users and copy protection then comes with the turf.
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
You're subject-line reminds me of Tongo[^]: "confront", "evade", "acquire", or "retreat"
Sounds like your customers are in retreat.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I use ESecuTech UniKey dongles, they are relatively cheap ($30-$36) and can be purchased in singles:
ESecuTech Unikey Store[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, Thank Ron
I had missed ESevuTech.
There's hope again.
:Ron
|
|
|
|
|
This is a very good question.
I do not have the answer either.
Below is what I have been doing.
I use the KeyLok II USB dongle as a security key in some of my stuff. http://www.keylok.com/[^]
These are great and relatively inexpensive for a project that requires extra security for both the creator and the end user.
For small commercial applications however, an extra $21.50 USD can elevate the total price too much and effect sales drastically.
For smaller cheaper apps I have combined two products from a company called Infralution. http://www.infralution.com/[^]
One is the Infralution Licencing System. It has a wealth of different ways to licence and protect your software.
Using a system like this is also good as it is relatively inexpensive and the more you sell the cheaper the licencing component actually is.
You can set it up to authenticate against the name of the PC instead of against hardware Ids.
This way your customer can install it on any other PC that has the same name.
Hardware locking is very annoying and gone are the days when hardware upgrades occurred with long periods of time between them.
Using this system you can also offer free trials and if people like the product then they are more likely to purchase.
I also use the .Net Encryptor (from the same company) to encrypt the exe, and render it safe or safer from de-compliers.
Interested in what other people do as well.
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Anders wrote: It is getting so bad that many simply won't buy a product using C/R I have two programs that installed copyright-protection cr@p on one of my machines without informing me beforehand.
Had I known they would do this, I would not have bought the licenses, and I will never pay then for any updates -- as soon as the licences expire or lose value those companies (not just products) are dead to me.
If I pay someone for specific code to perform specific tasks, I do not expect them to include code that performs completely different tasks, especially if the purpose of that code is to treat me like a criminal and to introduce security risks to my computers (either by looking where I would not give permission for it to look, or by creating back doors for itself, which most or all of these things do).
So if you use copyright protection "add-ons", I do not want your software.
If I steal your software, you are entitled to treat me like a criminal, but if I buy it, I expect to be treated with respect.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I agree with your sentiments exactly.
What then should a developer do?
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
|
|
|
|