|
Perhaps that is only a temp password and after a few days it expires.
After you log in with that password change it to a permanent one and see if that makes a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, i agree i will do it right away.
Thanks a Ton
Rahul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Sir,
I agree. Thanks for giving me the link. My bad
Thanks a Ton,
Rahul
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a portion of the email sent to you when you click "Forgot your password?":
<br />
Thank you for joining CodeProject, a community of Software Developers who have come together to share source code, articles and tutorials.<br />
<br />
A request was made to send you your email and password for CodeProject. Your details are as follows:<br />
<br />
Logon email : [yourEMailAddress]<br />
Password : [someRandomesquePassword]<br />
<br />
This request came from IP address: [IPAddress]<br />
<br />
<big>This password is a temporary password. If you happen to remember your old password then it is still valid and will work. If you log in using this new temporary password then your old password will be replaced by the new one.</big>
Hence, since the password is TEMPORARY, that's the cause of you having to "reset" your password.
Thus, change it ... both the password and your habit of not changing it when such is necessary to prevent you from having to once again change it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good catch ! I think there is some wisdom in the conclusion:
But maybe—just maybe—we should try to save the real bees first?
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a good step I suppose, but they can still spray at night. Do they think the poisons will have magically disappeared by the next day?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes:
The Agency also warned that spraying before dawn could leave traces of potentially harmful products on plants and in dew. Speaking to French newspaper Le Figaro on Wednesday, Axel Decourtye, scientific director at bee institute Itsap, supported the Agency's conclusions, saying "with the exception of wild bees that nest in the ground, darkness is effectively the only guarantee that there are no foraging bees in crops. The persistence of plant products means it is necessary to restrict their application towards the end of the night or at dawn."
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Ya, I read that. It's nuts.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, absorbed. And at night, bees are not around anymore.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Yes, absorbed. Wishful thinking.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I know, but at least I think is is a good step, I hope the little friends can detect the products have been sprayed on the plants and avoid them. Probably still less pollination, but not less bees.
Today, they are being sprayed themselves, which is lethal.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
We could put up signs, warning the bees.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Speak for yourself - I can't write that small.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on the poison, possibly yes. In addition to being absorbed through the pores (stomata) in the leaves, all insecticides commonly used have a half-life; once several half-life periods have passed, they are nearly undetectable. Applied properly, this can allow treatment to be effective during the night, with no measurable trace of the toxin remaining on the leaf surface in the morning. Are they likely to select an appropriate pesticide with a short enough half-life, then apply it in the correct concentration? Probably not, but that's a separate question.
As a side note, whenever I hire a bug sprayer for the house, I ask him "What's the half-life of that stuff you're spraying?" If he doesn't know the answer, he doesn't come back. Ever.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote: "What's the half-life of that stuff you're spraying?" If he doesn't know the answer, he doesn't come back. Ever. I'm guessing you never get your house sprayed.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't in a long time. I do it myself, like most everything else. My Dad was an agronomist, an expert in soils, plant feeding and culture, and pest identification and control. He taught me a lot more than I now remember, but these new kids aren't being taught anything at all!
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect wide-scale famine, disease and war will solve the problems of climate change, bee collapse, etc. fairly soon by reducing the world's population to a more sustainable level. Not trying to start to start an opinion war here, but it really does seem like we've created high-level problems faster than we can solve them, and having never addressed foundational problems, they will rear their ugly heads as a natural response to those higher level problems.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: by reducing the world's population to a more sustainable level
People who want to reduce the world's population should start with themselves. Any volunteers?
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, and people who want to solve world hunger should just eat. Much as people like to believe that contributing on a small scale changes anything, it really doesn't. Meaningful change starts with organization, rallying, politics, not with insignificant ants. Convincing ten other people is ten times as effective as just doing it yourself, whatever "it" is.
Also, that's not what Marc wrote, he wrote that it will happen (automatically), not that he wants it to happen or that he wants it to be done (actively).
|
|
|
|