|
DaveX86 wrote: Why does there have to be a central registry
For security and safety.
OK, so it's not a "must have" for a user. For a platform, though, it is. People need to trust it. Users just want to see lots of apps that look useful and try them all instead of seeing lots of apps and thinking "will it steal my credit info?", "is it just a scam app?".
It's not a technical issue, it's a social issue.
(and yes, Android can install anything. This is why 97% of all new exploits target Android[^])
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well it's a departure from 'The Microsoft Way' that made them so successful...they adopted 'The Apple Way' and it didn't work out for them. The thing that made Microsoft so popular was technically proficient people like us who figured things out and helped everyone out with it...that's gone, now they want a centralized support model like Apple...all Apple people call Apple Support...I've never called Microsoft support in my life and I started with DOS.
Android is targeted the most by hackers because they are the clear market winner: http://www.idc.com/prodserv/smartphone-os-market-share.jsp[^]
...hackers always target the most successful platform where they can get the most bang for their efforts...used to be Windows...
|
|
|
|
|
I would argue that hackers target the platform that provides them the best return on their development investment.
If a single iOS intrusion resulted in 10X "revenue" to a given Android intrusion (to make up numbers) then there'd be 10X effort put into Apple. If it's 1000 times harder (again, to pick a number) then the 10X effort won't be enough and so effort would be redirected back to Android.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Your argument makes sense if the hacking community only goes after Americans, as that's where the biggest Apple saturation is.
I can't pretend to know how the economics of hacking work or even how one applies for a job in it...if I only had time and energy to be a master of one platform, I would go for the most popular one.
Make sure to keep your Bluetooth turned off...hackers always 'Blue-jack' your phone...see it on Person of Interest all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I personally prefer a tin-foil hat.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
DaveX86 wrote: all Apple people call Apple Support
Where did that come from?
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
Do you know an Apple person who's never called Support?
|
|
|
|
|
DaveX86 wrote: Do you know an Apple person who's never called Support? Myself, my wife, my daughter...
I have (a VERY long time ago) called Microsoft support though. Turns out it was a virus.
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
All right, you win...it was an unfair generalization
|
|
|
|
|
Have you seen the news? Microsoft is saying you should uninstall the security update for MS14-045
From the article below:
"Installation went smoothly. After rebooting everything worked fine. But when I shut down my notebook and switched it on a little later it came up with a blue screen with a Stop 0x50 in Win32k.sys. I could not even boot into safe mode as Windows failed to start no matter which mode chose," wrote a user identified as "xformer" to start a now-long thread on Microsoft's support discussion forum.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9250446/Microsoft_urges_customers_to_uninstall_Blue_Screen_of_Death_update[^]
|
|
|
|
|
This is a relief, my PC at home was bluescreening all weekend and I thought it was a hardware problem, I'm hoping it was this!
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry you were having the problem, but hope this resolves it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
So if you check the link that gives more information about the bad update (https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms14-045.aspx[^] ) then you will see that the KB number is:
2984615
That is the number that is displayed in your View Update History so why M$ refers to it as this other number I have no idea. Well, it's because they like to create confusion, of course.
Also, when you try to determine if that KB is installed on your computer, you will have a hard time, because you can't easily -- or maybe at all -- sort by those values.
Way to go, Microsoft.
Here's the quick path to how to get to a place which displays installed updates:
Control Panel\System and Security\Windows Update\View update history
|
|
|
|
|
fwiw - I used Nirsoft Sysexporter, pointed it to the listbox that shows the updates, dumped all the info to a text file, then simply did a search for 2984615
.. may help someone else speed up the process
|
|
|
|
|
Why not just use the Search box in Explorer?
|
|
|
|
|
d'oh that would imply that I remembered/realised that the patches were 'files' named with the relevant ID in the filename
thanks for that
|
|
|
|
|
Upgrade to Windows 8.1 and your problem is solved.
Unless, of course, you are one of those who insists on running an old version of the operating system and then complaining when something goes wrong.
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
Bumpersticker, "My other OS is UBUNTU!"
|
|
|
|
|
Then why do you even run Windows if you like UBUNTU so much?
Oh wait, it doesn't support some of the things for which you need a computer.
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
Just Microsoft-based dev. That is all. Everything else I want in a computer is on Ubuntu.
When M$ OS finally fails and the company goes out of business then I won't have to worry about it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
newton.saber wrote: Just Microsoft-based dev.
Why is that not a surprise. When UBUNTU takes over the enterprise market -- maybe not in your lifetime -- you will not need to deal with Windows any more.
newton.saber wrote: When M$ OS finally fails and the company goes out of business then I won't have to worry about it at all.
Maybe not in your lifetime.
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
And, actually, I really wouldn't want that. I don't think. I guess.
I mean I've been developing software for Microsoft since Win 3.0.
There was a period of time when Windows owned the OS market and things were easier, really.
Now users can be picky and software has to run on a gazillion different platforms.
Save us from it all, web apps.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see where the problem is.
This is Blue Screen of Death update. So naturally this means more BSOD than normally. M$ users always get more than they payed for
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
|
|
|
|
|
Argonia wrote: M$ users always get more than they payed for
It is an unadvertised feature.
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
Argonia wrote: more BSOD than normally. M$ users always get more than they payed for
Right on! Way to turn a frown, upside down
|
|
|
|