|
... they'd still be lemons.
|
|
|
|
|
After a certain time you would be forced to upgrade to latest version.
A home without books is a body without soul. Marcus Tullius Cicero
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, you can only use their proprietary iGas, fill the tires with iAir, and you are required to purchase iNsurance.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: you'd have to buy a new one every time they repainted the lines on the road.
They would also own the roads.
|
|
|
|
|
iRoads 
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you think the I-95 is named as such...
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
And don't forget the contortion you'd have to make to get the radio to work...
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Instead of a real knob, there would be a picture of a knob on a touch screen that behaves nothing like a real knob!
|
|
|
|
|
Which you would slide back and forth.
|
|
|
|
|
There is an amusing science fiction short story from many years ago that describes a world where cars are limited by design to the roads built by the car company.
So many problems like buying a car that will work on the roads between your house and job. And cross company agreements that allow more expensive cars to travel down other companies roads. I think there was a discussion of after market addons to allow cross road travel as well.
I think the story was told from the perspective of a car dealer and how he was trying to show how his car was the best to a reluctant customer.
|
|
|
|
|
Someone could easily adapt that story to try to convince people that it's a good idea to have bicycles sharing the same streets that were initially designed for car use.
Oh wait. There's already such a group of people.
|
|
|
|
|
The pedestrians were there first.
In some areas here, signs say that bicycle can use the whole lane.
|
|
|
|
|
The pedestrians got their own sidewalks, on both sides of almost every street.
Signs can say whatever they want, the laws of physics reign supreme.
I used to work with a guy whose neighbor is now a quadriplegic, because some woman in a minivan "got blinded by the sun" and drifted into a dedicated bike lane and plowed into a group of them - that was at low speed. Cringe. Every summer I hear such stories, and it makes me downright angry. Awareness campaigns and increased fines are just a temporary feel-good measure.
As I said in another thread elsewhere, I was about 7 years old when I understood that bicycles on roads already used by cars is just a (possibly fatal) accident waiting to happen, helmets be damned. I don't know why a grown-ass adult thinks he should take a chance.
Nope.
Nope, nope. Nope.
Never. Not for me.
|
|
|
|
|
The streets pre-existed the cars. The cars are interlopers on our streets.
I also haven't ridden my bicycle on a street for a long while. I've known two grown-assed men who were killed while doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: The streets pre-existed the cars.
...and I wrote:
The pedestrians got their own sidewalks
Pretty much all streets got retrofitted to have sidewalks. Drivers are generally careful enough not to climb onto sidewalks with their cars.
But when I see an existing street suddenly get bike lanes just by repainting lines on them...that just means the street just got narrower for everybody, which simply exacerbates the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: helmets be damned.
Helmets do make it a bit easier to find the detached head of motorcycle riders after they crash though.
|
|
|
|
|
True.
And if it's dark, you won't mistake a clump of hair/scalp for a chunk of top-soil with grass growing out of it.
(as reported by a tow-truck driving acquaintance of mine...he still has nightmares)
|
|
|
|
|
Ironic post considering Microsoft OS crashes are wreaking havoc across the globe today…
|
|
|
|
|
I hate all operating systems with the possible exception of QNX, but Apple hardware in particular is hateful.
And considering how many problems I've had with several different people's Apple products in the past week, 1 dodgy update from a mid cyber security firm hardly rates, even if the blast radius was stupid. That's not windows' fault. That's "imma put all my software eggs in one basket, what could happen?" fault.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Only a little OT. Around the millenium I helped administer some QNX based systems (VISA VAPs). Absolutely loved it.
But they had their own Y2K bug!
The standard c library definition of year in the time struct was "CE year minus 1900", not "CE year % 100", and the ls file dates reported year 100.
Cosmetic issue only, but amusing. Probably occurred in a bunch of other *nixes too.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
One of the very few software adjustments I had to make for Y2K was to have our UI show the year as 00 rather than 100 -- DEC (ANSI) C on OpenVMS.
And the DBAs had to alter some Oracle reports, if I recall correctly, to use RR rather than YY for the date.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be interested in hearing why you hate all operating systems with the possible exception of QNX.
|
|
|
|
|
Because every single one I've ever used has let me down, in a big way at one point or another.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Early in my career, Serge, a middle management guy whom I also respected for his technical knowledge, told me that he sometimes had to deal with this kind of thing:
Serge: I want 2+2=4 on the screen.
Developers: We can do it, but it won't be elegant. We have to rewrite the operating system.
Is that what you're talking about?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
