|
Oh, excuse me my dear
Well then you are close to a solution !
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Oh thanks for saying that I'm close to a solution
|
|
|
|
|
3rd and 6th character must be the same they said,
1st character can never be the same as 3rd and 6th one, they never said
Hope it's the right answer
|
|
|
|
|
Yes they did - the symbol for the 3rd and 6th characters is not the same as the symbol for the 1st character.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh okay, then will look for another word, in which 3rd and 6th characters are same but the both are not same as the 1st one at all
|
|
|
|
|
|
well that's perfectly alright
HobbyProggy said that I'm close to a solution, so just trying to reach it shortly
|
|
|
|
|
I will make tomorrow's one easier, please don't hesitate to have a go.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it "freaked" by any chance.
cause I'm freaking out right now
|
|
|
|
|
Nope sorry I will post the answer in about half and hour, I suspect you will kick yourself me!
|
|
|
|
|
Display Name Taken wrote: Nope sorry
Well thats perfectly alright once again
Display Name Taken wrote: I suspect you will kick yourself me!
yeah, I too suspect so, so I'm just gonna cross my fingers and wait for the correct answer (edited: FROM YOU)
modified 18-Aug-15 7:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Cheater ?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, it looks like I might be doing it again tomorrow, I didn't think it was that difficult (to me anyway) I suppose once you know the answer then its easy you know the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
well still 35 minutes left eh?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, there is still hope. I wanted to post another clue but I didn't want to break the rules.
|
|
|
|
|
GREAVES
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, will you post the solution ?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I will, I can't believe nobody got it.
|
|
|
|
|
For all the bacon lovers out there.
http://www.gocomics.com/wizardofid/2015/08/18[^]
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
WOI has not been in the local paper for years. Thanks for the refresh of my memory.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
Having a very curious and tech-savvy eight-year-old at home, I'm thinking it's about time I added an extra layer of protection to my web connection. Although most of his computer time is supervised, he is more than capable of using the smart TV etc., so I was thinking of adding a whitelist/blacklist to my router. Does anyone have any experience with this? Does it work? Is it obtrusive?
Other than that, what about net-nanny type software? (though I'd prefer a router solution, so I don't have to 'fix' all the connected devices)
|
|
|
|
|
URL blacklisting in routers isn't very reliable (VPNs, proxies, even HTTPS..), IP blacklists have to be updated.. but they work to some extent. Using opendns.com you can probably do some better filtering, but of course that is fairly easily avoided by setting 8.8.8.8 as the DNS (does he/she know how to do that?).
Kyudos wrote: Is it obtrusive? Well yes, if you wanted to visit the sites you're blocking.
By the way, they're probably already shitposting on 4chan anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: Using opendns.com you can probably do some better filtering, but of course that is fairly easily avoided by setting 8.8.8.8 as the DNS (does he/she know how to do that?)
Thankfully, he doesn't know that yet! I'll look into OpenDNS I think. I'm under no illusions about being able to 'protect' him for long, but hopefully I can keep him from accidental exposure for a while longer...
|
|
|
|
|
You are doomed... you know kyudosjr is already a ian and he is reading this post hust now...
|
|
|
|