|
VW / Toyota and others are quite up-to-date lately
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I subscribe to a production newsletter where 70%-80% of the content is IT related. So, what are you complaining about?
The difficult may take time, the impossible a little longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 10707677 wrote: a production newsletter Contrary to popular belief we IT folks can be productive too
|
|
|
|
|
My daughter can attest to that. She has a doctorate in astronomy. Her thesis involved writing software for adaptive optics.
The difficult may take time, the impossible a little longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Given the crap that is sometimes posted in the newsletter, I'm glad of something a little more interesting. Perhaps if you'd care to go and find some IT related news, you could add it to the forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Gosh, Pete, that seems a bit harsh; I think Kent and Sean (and, now, Kevin) do an exceptional job of web-crawling and distilling the tasty/juicy from the hype and dregs.
cheers, Bill
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
But they aren't the only ones who post in there are they? Also, Kent has sometimes let his standards slip - on slow news days.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, that was uncalled for. Of course personal taste, but I find the newsletter quite OK, especially when compared to other "IT" newsletters.
|
|
|
|
|
And which bit, exactly, was uncalled for? The fact that I called some of the content that has been posted crap? Do you honestly believe that all of the content that has ever been in there is of the highest quality?
|
|
|
|
|
This is an overly sensitive crowd these days, here at CP. Has been for a while, IMHO. You have to think about everyone's feelings before posting your opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
I find this offensive!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: This is an overly sensitive crowd these days, Isn't it just.
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO, the Insider News is the real Technology Insider - the one-stop-shop for the state-of-the-art. The one site to visit every single day.
|
|
|
|
|
You know this really sounds like "I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favourite shop on the Citadel"?
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
|
|
|
|
|
I'm Coder Shepard and this is my favorite site on the internet.
Imagine being greeted by that in the original voice every time you enter this place.
|
|
|
|
|
Eugh In Mass Effect I did it for the money!
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
|
|
|
|
|
That just sounds dirty to me
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, I wouldn't go so far as to call it crap... Lots of good stuff in there.
Not saying the Astronomy isn't interesting, but I don't think it belongs in an IT newsletter.
|
|
|
|
|
You may note that I said some of it is crap. People do seem to be getting their knickers in a twist that I don't find it all to be a diamond of the highest order.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I don't find it all to be a diamond of the highest order Well, that is knicker-twistable indeed!
I agree though, the astronomy posts are crap
Not that the Insider peeps should listen to that, you can't please everyone and overall I'm pretty pleased
|
|
|
|
|
Some days there are just not enough IT news worth publishing - and one "language popuarity" news per day is still too much IMHO. I believe it is way better to have a slighlty broader focus, after all Astronomy today has more IT tahn most of the research experiments, barring particle accelerators and possibly a few others.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: Astronomy today has more IT tahn most of the research experiments Except most of those articles aren't about the technology behind the research
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I understand that, but each achievement obtained in that fields is at least partly due to the technology, so it makes sense - much more sense than the thousands of articles summarizable in "<person with big ego> states <technology> is <dead | the future | wrong | misunderstood by everyone besides me>".
Of course this is my personal view
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
modified 15-Oct-15 4:34am.
|
|
|
|
|