|
I was reading the thread and had exact the same idea... but then I saw your post
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Cute.
Thanks.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Subtle indeed. I never use char literals unless absolutely necessary. A one char string is a tad expensive in some cases, but surely not in this one.
|
|
|
|
|
PartDivider is a char?
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
It is.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Is that what caused the CSS to go wack-a-doodle?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Which CSS?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Dunno for him, but for me it keeps on resetting the layout like I'm not logged in... going to compact view, back to fixed from fluid, etc.
On a Mac in Chrome if that helps.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
See post below for screenshot, The Lounge[^]. Chrome on linux and win10 for me. The whole screen stretches out and font was smaller.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, you mean this output[^]? I am sure the aftermath of that bug was really very graphical.
See the layout.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Connect your cable, you're low on battery.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
So, the pixels flattened due to the empty space, I guess?
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: So, the pixels flattened due to the empty space, I guess? No, just forgot to run my Bit Recycler[^]. It is like defragmenting, but for the bits.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I thought that I was the only one who still uses GIMP.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Well, now there's two of you.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I use GIMP as well (not that much, but I use it).
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, GIMP's no big deal. There's nothing I can't draw with AutoCad, Paint.NET, and InkScape.
|
|
|
|
|
Does that have anything to do with Thread View being wonky today?
I noticed on my Droid using Chrome, but it was still messed up when I logged in via IE11 as well.
Possibly, it's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
When you say "thread view" do you mean that you were kicked into a different default view on the forums?
We did a hefty refactor this week to clean up some debris from 4 years ago. We tested the blazes out of it but no matter what you test you'll always miss something. Unless you're NASA.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it's no longer staying in Thread View, even Fluid layout isn't being retained.
I'll keep an eye on it this weekend though -- I'll tell my wife it's research...
P.S. I'm now on my home system -- Win 7 and IE11 -- and it's still not keeping the settings I select.
Also, it goes into "relaxed" rather then "tight" -- but the 50 items per page seems stable.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll throw in my experience as well - got Fixed when I visited the Lounge, always had Fluid. Corrected it, then hit Reply to come to this page... and it's Fixed again
Well, nobody died so it's not such a big deal.
Cheers,
विक्रम
"We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread
|
|
|
|
|
NASA has historically missed quite a lot, even idiotic things like metric vs. imperial confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm curious, do you know why it end up 1_298?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm adding a char and an int and adding that to a string.
If it was string + char + int it would all be good, but it's string += char + int whichh gets implicitly cast to string += (string)(int + int). (int) '_' = 95, so '_' + 3 = 98.
we get "1_2" + "98" = "1_298"
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Kelly wrote: Subtle indeed. I never use char literals unless absolutely necessary. A one char string is a tad expensive in some cases, but surely not in this one. I agree with that.
Also to me it seems that PartDivider is meant for only formatting purposes (judging from the name itself, aka it's meant for interpolation or concatenation purposes) so it seems kind-of intuitive to specify it as string .
Nevertheless in this kind of cases I always prefer using interpolated (if you can use a higher C# version) or formattable strings, for example:
private const string ObjectRefGuidFormat = "{0}{1:_0}{2:_0}";
string objectRefGuid = string.Format(ObjectRefGuidFormat,
objectRef.ObjectTypeId,
objectRef.ObjectId,
objectRef.VersionNumber > 0 ? objectRef.VersionNumber.ToString() : null);
|
|
|
|